Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Influence of the recall period on a beverage-specific weekly drinking measure for alcohol intake

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

Our knowledge of the association between alcohol intake and alcohol-related health outcomes depends, to a large extent, on the validity and reliability of self-reported alcohol intake. Weekly drinking measures are frequently used in epidemiological surveys, but it has been shown that respondents have problems in correctly reporting intake for a full week. The aim of this study is to investigate whether a beverage-specific question implies better recall and, thereby, eliminates or diminishes the previously reported association between the recall period and the self-reported weekly alcohol intake.

Subjects/Methods:

The data is derived from the Danish Health Interview Survey 2005, which is based on a region-stratified random sample of 21 832 Danish citizens aged ≥16 years (response rate: 67%). The data were collected via face-to-face interviews.

Results:

A beverage-specific question on alcohol intake on each day during the last week did not alter the strong association between the recall period and self-reported alcohol intake. However, the overall self-reported alcohol intake increased substantially when using the beverage-specific question instead of asking for the overall alcohol intake on each day. Moreover, the analyses indicated that interviews on Sundays should be avoided if the purpose is to assess alcohol intake for the previous day (Saturdays).

Conclusions:

It seems problematic to recall alcohol intake even when the recall period is as short as 1 week. Weekly drinking measures should primarily be used when the main aim of the study is to assess the average volume of alcohol intake in a specific population.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvik A, Haldorsen T, Lindemann R (2005). Consistency of reported alcohol use by pregnant women: anonymous versus confidential questionnaires with item nonresponse differences. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 29, 1444–1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babor TF, Steinberg K, Anton R, Del Boca F (2000). Talk is cheap: measuring drinking outcomes in clinical trials. J Stud Alcohol 61, 55–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biomarkers Definition Working Group (2001). Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther 69, 89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson DA (2003). Methodological issues in measuring alcohol use. Alcohol Res Health 27, 18–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Del Boca FK, Darkes J (2003). The validity of self-reports of alcohol consumption: state of the science and challenges for research. Addiction 98 (Suppl 2), S1–S12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Boca FK, Noll JA (2000). Truth or consequences: the validity of self-report data in health services research on addictions. Addiction 95 (Suppl 3), S347–S360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm O (2004). Influence of the recall period on self-reported alcohol intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 58, 60–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm O, Hesse U, Davidsen M, Kjøller M (2009). The study design and characteristics of the Danish national health interview surveys. Scand J Public Health 37, 758–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm O, Kjøller M, Davidsen M, Hesse U, Eriksen L, Christensen AI . et al. (2006). Sundhed og sygelighed i Danmark 2005 & udviklingen siden 1987. National Institute of Public Health: Copenhagen, Denmark (In Danish).

  • Ekholm O, Strandberg-Larsen K, Christensen K, Grønbæk M (2008). Comparison of assessment methods for self-reported alcohol consumption in health interview surveys. Eur J Clin Nutr 62, 286–291.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feunekes GI, van ‘t Veer P, van Staveren WA, Kok FJ (1999). Alcohol intake assessment: the sober facts. Am J Epidemiol 150, 105–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman WM, Vrana KE (2010). Future prospects for biomarkers of alcohol consumption and alcohol-induced disorders. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 34, 946–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galea S, Tracy M (2007). Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol 17, 643–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grønbæk M, Iversen L, Olsen J, Becker U, Hardt F, Sørensen TIA (1997). Sensible drinking limits. Ugeskr Læger 159, 5939–5945, (In Danish, English summary).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartge P (2006). Participation in population studies. Epidemiology 17, 252–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellman M, Ramstedt M (2009). Cross-border purchase of alcohol in the Nordic countries. Nordic Stud Alcohol Drugs 26, 111–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaskutas LA, Kerr WC (2008). Accuracy of photographs to capture respondent-defined drink size. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 69, 605–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr WC, Greenfield TK, Tujague J, Brown SE (2005). A drink is a drink? Variation in the amount of alcohol contained in beer, wine and spirits drinks in a US methodological sample. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 29, 2015–2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr WC, Patterson D, Koenen MA, Greenfield TK (2008). Alcohol content variation of bar and restaurant drinks in northern California. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 32, 1623–1629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjøller M, Rasmussen NK, Keiding L, Petersen HC, Nielsen GA (1995). Sundhed og sygelighed i Danmark 1994 - og udviklingen siden 1987. The Danish Institute for Clinical Epidemiology: Copenhagen, Denmark (In Danish).

  • Leigh BC (2000). Using daily reports to measure drinking and drinking patterns. J Subst Abuse 12, 51–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmens PH (1994). The alcohol content of self-report and ‘standard’ drinks. Addiction 89, 593–601.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mørch LS, Becker U, Olsen J, Tjønneland AM, Grønbæk MN (2005). Should the sensible drinking limits for adults be changed? Ugeskr Læger 167, 3777–3779, (In Danish, English summary).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson K (2004–2005). Biomarkers for alcohol use and abuse—a summary. Alcohol Res Health 28, 30–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rehm J (1998). Measuring quantity, frequency and volume of drinking. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 22 (Suppl 2), 4S–14S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rehm J, Greenfield TK, Walsh G, Xie X, Robson L, Single E (1999). Assessment methods of alcohol consumption, prevalence of high risk drinking and harm: a sensitivity analysis. Int J Epidemiol 28, 219–224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell M, Welte JW, Barnes GM (1991). Quantity-frequency measures of alcohol consumption: beverage-specific vs global questions. Brit J Addict 86, 409–417.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scott SC, Goldberg MS, Mayo NE (1997). Statistical assessment of ordinal outcomes in comparative studies. J Clin Epidemiol 50, 45–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Serdula MK, Mokdad AH, Byers T, Siegel PZ (1999). Assessing alcohol consumption: beverage-specific versus grouped-beverage questions. J Stud Alcohol 60, 99–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simpura J, Karlsson T (2001). Trends in drinking patterns among adult population in 15 European countries, 1950 to 2000: a review. Nordic Stud Alcohol Drugs 18, 31–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Denmark (2010). StatBank Denmark. http://www.statistikbanken.dk, 08–17.

  • Stockwell T, Zhao J, Chikritzhs T, Greenfield TK (2008). What did you drink yesterday? Public health relevance of a recent recall method used in the 2004 Australian National Drug Strategy Household Survey. Addiction 103, 919–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes ME, Davis CS, Koch GG (2000). Categorical Data Analysis Using The SAS System. 2nd edition. SAS Institute Inc: Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O Ekholm.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ekholm, O., Strandberg-Larsen, K. & Grønbæk, M. Influence of the recall period on a beverage-specific weekly drinking measure for alcohol intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 65, 520–525 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.1

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links