Skip to main content
Log in

Health behaviours and socio-economic status in Ontario, Canada

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data from the 1990 Ontario Health Survey were used to investigate the association of socio-economic status with the likelihood of meeting current recommendations for four health behaviours (smoking, fat intake, alcohol consumption, and physical activity level) in adults living in Ontario (Canada). Health behaviours were categorised as ‘unhealthy’ if they did not meet current recommendations in Ontario (smoking, fat intake < 30% of dietary energy, alcohol intake < 14 units per week, low level of leisure-time physical activity). Two summary variables based on the number ofÔ unhealthyÕ behaviours were also examined: the crude number of ‘unhealthy’ behaviours reported and the likelihood of reporting 3 or 4 ‘unhealthy’ behaviours. Four measures of socio-economic status were used: educational achievement, household income status, source of household income, and occupational prestige. Multiple logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to explore the association of each ‘unhealthy’ behaviour and of the summary variables with socio-economic status indicators (taken independently or simultaneously), controlling for demographic characteristics. Except for the positive relationship between income status and high alcohol intake, measures of ‘unhealthy’ behaviours were inversely associated with the socio-economic indices, suggesting that individuals in lower socio-economic groups are at an increased risk for health problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organisation. Prevention in childhood and youth of adult cardiovascular diseases: Time for action. Report of a WHO study Group. Technical Report Series No. 792. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Surgeon General's Report on Nutrition and Health. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services, US Government Printing Office, 1988.

  3. World Health Organisation. WHO committee on diabetes mellitus (second report). Technical Report Series No. 646. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organisation. Controlling the smoking epidemic. Report of a WHO expert committee on smoking control. Technical Report Series No. 636. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Department of Health. The health of the nation. A strategy for health in England. London: HMSO, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The Coronary Prevention Group. Prevention of cardiovascular disease. Recommendations for National Governments. London, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Premier's Council on Health Strategy: Objectives and targets for reducing illness, disability and premature death. Report of the working group on goal 4 to the goals committee. Toronto: Premier's Council on Health Strategy, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Health People 2000. National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives. Full report, with commentary. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services, US Government Printing Office, 1991.

  9. Stephens T. Health behaviour and health status. In: Rootman I, Warren R, Stephens T, Peters L (eds), Canada's Health Promotion Survey. Technical Report. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Health and Welfare Canada, 1988: 171–179.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stachenko SJ, Reeder BA, Lindsay E, et al. Canadian Heart Health Surveys Research Group. Smoking prevalence and associated risk factors in Canadian adults. Can Med Assoc J 1992; 146: 1989–1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hulshof KFAM, Löwik MRH, Kok FJ, et al. Diet and other life-style factors in high and low socio-economic groups (Dutch Nutrition Surveillance System). Eur J Clin Nutr 1991; 45: 441–450.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Millar WJ, Wigle DT. Socioeconomic disparities in risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Can Med Assoc J 1986; 134: 127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cummins RO, Shaper AG, Walker M, et al. Smoking and drinking by middle-aged British men: Effects of social class and town of residence. Br Med J 1981; 283: 1497–1502.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tenconi MT, Romanelli C, Gigli F, et al. The relationship between education and risk factors for coronary heart disease. Epidemiological analysis from the Nine Communities Study. Eur J Epidemiol 1992; 8: 763–769.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Escobedo LG, Peddicord JP. Smoking prevalence in US birth cohorts: The influence of gender and education. Am J Public Health 1996; 86: 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ontario Ministry of Health: Ontario Health Survey 1990. User's Guide, vol. 1: Documentation. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. National Council on Welfare. 1989 Poverty lines: Estimates by the National Council of Welfare. Ottawa: National Council on Welfare, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Statistics Canada. Income distributions by size in Canada, 1989. Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services, 1990.

  19. Ontario Ministry of Health: Ontario Health Survey 1990. User's Guide, vol. 2: Microdata Manual. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Blishen BR, McRoberts HA. A revised socioeconomic index for occupations in Canada. Can R Soc Anthr 1976; 13: 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schwartz JL, Thompson B. Evolution of tobacco control strategies. Strategies to Control Tobacco Use in the United States: A blueprint for public health action in the 1990's. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 1. Rockville, MD: National Cancer Institute, US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, 1991: 35–72.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Health and Welfare Canada. Nutrition recommendations. The Report of the Scientific Review Committee 1990. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Health and Welfare Canada, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bright-See E, Catlin G, Godin G. Assessment of the relative validity of the Ontario Health Survey food frequency questionnaire. J Can Diet Assoc 1994; 55: 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ontario Ministry of Health. A framework for the response to alcohol and drug problems in Ontario. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Midanik LT, Harford TC. Workshop on measurement issues in alcohol consumption. Alcohol consumption measurement: Introduction to the workshop. Addiction 1994; 89: 393–394.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wyllie A, Zhang JF, Casswell S. Workshop on measurement issues in alcohol consumption. Comparison of six alcohol consumption measures from survey data. Addition 1994; 89: 425–430.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cox BG, Cohen SB. Variance approximation strategies for survey estimates. In: Cox BG, Cohen SB (eds), Methodological issues for health care surveys. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, 1985: 356–386.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rosner B (ed). Fundamentals of biostatistics, 3rd edn. Boston, MA: PWS-Kent Publishing Company, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods, 2nd edn. Boston, MA: PWS-Kent Publishing Company, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kennedy WJ, Bancroft TA. Model building for prediction in regression based upon repeated significant tests. Ann Math Statist 1971; 42: 1273–1284.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Greenland S. Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis. Am J Public Health 1989; 79: 340–349.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mickey RM, Greenland S. The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 129: 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kleinbaum DG. Epidemiology forums: Collinearity diagnostics. Video #0452 EPO, April 4, 1992. Atlanta: Centre for Disease Control, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rogers RG, Nam CB, Hummer RA. Demographic and socioeconomic links to cigarette smoking. Soc Biol 1995; 42: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jacobsen BK, Thelle DS. Risk factors for coronary heart disease and level of education. The Tromsø Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol 1988; 127: 923–932.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Winkleby MA, Jatulis DE, Frank E, et al. Socioeconomic status and health: How education, income, and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Am J Public Health 1992; 82: 816–820.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Winkleby MA, Fortmann SP, Barrett DC. Social class disparities in risk factors for disease: Eight-year prevalence patterns by level of education. Prev Med 1990; 19: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Osler M. Social class and health behaviour in Danish adults: A longitudinal study. Public Health 1993; 107: 251–260.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Seccareccia F, Menotti A, Prati PL. Coronary heart disease prevention: Relationship between socioeconomic status and knowledge motivation and behaviour in a free-living male, adult population. Eur J Epidemiol 1991; 7: 166–170.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Marmot MG, Davey Smith G, Stansfeld S, et al. Health inequalities among British civil servants: The Whitehall II Study. Lancet 1991; 337: 1387–1393.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Adlaf EM. Alcohol and other drug use. In: Stephens T, Fowler Graham D (eds), Canada's Health Promotion Survey 1990: Technical Report. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada, 1993: 103–123.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Peele S. The conflict between public health goals and the temperance mentality. Am J Public Health 1993; 83: 805–810.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Stampfer MJ, Rimm EB, Chapman Walsh D. Commentary: Alcohol, the heart, and public policy. Am J Public Health 1993; 83: 801–804.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Craft N. WHO denounces health benefits of alcohol. Br Med J 1994; 309: 1249.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Interdepartment Working Group. Sensible drinking. London: Department of Health, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Liberatos P, Link BG, Kelsey JL. The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev 1980; 10: 87–121.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Blishen BR, Carroll WK, Moore C. The 1981 socioeconomic index for occupations in Canada. Canad Rev Soc Anth 1987; 24: 465–488.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Coughlin SS. Recall bias in epidemiologic studies. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 43: 87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Nelson LM, Longstreth WT Jr, Koepsell TD, et al. Proxy respondents in epidemiologic research. Epidemiol Rev 1990; 12: 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wagenknecht LE, Burke GL, Perking LL, et al. Misclassification of smoking status in the Cardia Study: A comparison of self-report with serum cotinine levels. Am J Public Health 1992; 82: 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Hermann N. Retrospective information from questionnaires. I. Comparability of primary respondents and their next-of-kin. Am J Epidemiol 1985; 121: 937–947.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Rogot E, Reid DD. The validity of data from next-of-kin in studies of mortality among migrants. Int J Epidemiol 1975; 4: 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Curry SJ, Koepsell T, Wagner EH, et al. Assessment of community-level influences on individuals attitudes about cigarette smoking, alcohol use, and consumption of dietary fat. Am J Prev Med 1993; 9: 78–84.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pomerleau, J., Pederson, L.L., Østbye, T. et al. Health behaviours and socio-economic status in Ontario, Canada. Eur J Epidemiol 13, 613–622 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007339720807

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007339720807

Navigation