Elsevier

Maturitas

Volume 80, Issue 2, February 2015, Pages 187-191
Maturitas

The association between sedentary behaviour, moderate–vigorous physical activity and frailty in NHANES cohorts

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.11.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Many people over the age of 50, and most of those who are frail, are highly sedentary.

  • Frail individuals fail to demonstrate the physical activity patterns that were seen in the non-frail.

  • Sedentary behaviour and MVPA were associated with frailty and other adverse health outcomes.

Abstract

Objectives

(1) To examine how sedentary behaviour and moderate–vigorous (MVPA) are each experienced during the day across different levels of frailty; (2) estimate and compare the extent to which high levels of sedentary behaviour and low levels of MVPA are associated with increased frailty and self-reported health, disability and healthcare utilization.

Methods

Community dwelling adults aged 50+ from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2003–2004; 2005–2006). Frailty was measured with the frailty index and physical activity was measured using ActiGraph accelerometers.

Results

On average, people engaged in about 8.5 h of sedentary behaviour each day. The most frail individuals were more sedentary and less likely to meet weekly MVPA guidelines (9.57 h/day; 8.3%) than non-frail individuals (8.18 h/day; 1.1%; p < 0.001). Frail individuals failed to demonstrate the patterns of the healthier individuals—higher levels of sedentary behaviour on Sundays and in the evenings and decreasing MVPA throughout the week. High sedentary behaviour and low MVPA were independently associated with higher levels of frailty, poor self-reported health, high ADL disability and higher healthcare usage.

Conclusions

Many people over the age of 50, and most of those who are frail, were highly sedentary with very few meeting the recommended weekly levels of MVPA. Sedentary behaviour and MVPA were independently associated with frailty and adverse health outcomes in middle to older aged adults. Future research should focus on a longitudinal study to determine the temporal relationship between sedentary behaviour and frailty.

Introduction

Despite the known benefits of physical activity [1], [2], physical activity levels have declined as the technological age has arrived [3]. Older adults have much lower levels of physical activity compared to younger adults [4]. While it has been reported that frail older adults, those at an increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes [5], [6], tend to be more inactive than non-frail individuals of the same age [7], this evidence is limited and usually focuses on the overall levels of physical activity [8]. An examination of whether patterns of physical activity (such as intensity, day of the week and time of day) differ amongst individuals with varying levels of frailty may provide an understanding of where we need to target interventions [9].

Research on low levels of physical activity and adverse health outcomes has focused mainly on moderate–vigorous physical activity (MVPA), activities in which the individual exerts greater than 3 metabolic equivalents (METS) including swimming, bicycling, running or hiking [1], [2]; whereas research on the association between sedentary behaviour and adverse health outcomes is limited. Sedentary behaviours such as TV viewing, work, sitting, and driving are linked to poor health outcomes including cardiovascular problems, metabolism, cancer and mortality [10], [11]. This association, albeit attenuated, remains even in those who meet the recommended level of MVPA [10]. No studies yet have examined the direct and independent impacts of MVPA and sedentary behaviour on frailty. The objectives of this study are first, to examine how sedentary behaviour and moderate–vigorous activity are each experienced during the day across different levels of frailty and second, to estimate and compare the extent to which high levels of sedentary behaviour and low levels of MVPA are associated with increased frailty and other domains of health including self-reported health, disability and healthcare utilization.

Section snippets

Sample and study design

We conducted secondary analysis of the cross-sectional data from the 2003 to 2004 and 2005 to 2006 cohorts of the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)[12]. We excluded individuals younger than 50 years of age or with missing accelerometer or frailty data (see below) for a final sample size of 3146. The NHANES survey protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and all patients provided written

Results

Of 4874 participants over the age of 50, 3146 (mean age 63.3 ± 10.1; 53.7% women; 17.0% ADL disability) were included in this analysis. Those who were excluded due to missing physical activity or frailty data were slightly older with slightly higher levels of ADL disability (mean age 65.9 ± 12.0, 54.3% women, 19.8% ADL disability). An average of 6.24 ± 0.94 valid days of accelerometer data was available for each person; those who were non-frail or vulnerable were more likely to have more valid of

Discussion

This study distinguished physical activity patterns of varying levels of frailty using robust measures of frailty and physical activity and demonstrated that regardless of frailty level, participants spent a significant amount of time sedentary. Even so those who were more frail were more likely to have higher levels of sedentary behaviour and consequently, they were less likely to meet the recommendation of 2.5 h of weekly moderate–vigorous physical activity and the targeted 10,000 steps per

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

The NHANES survey protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and all patients provided written informed consent.

Contributors

JB, OT, KR declare that they participated in the research design, analysis, writing of this manuscript and that they have seen and approved the final version. SK declares that she participated in the analysis and writing of this manuscript and that he have seen and approved the final version. PA declares that he participated in the analysis of this manuscript and that they have seen and approved the final version.

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

Funding

The authors have received no funding for this article. KR is supported by an operating grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and receives funding from the Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation as Kathryn Allen Weldon Professor of Alzheimer Research. OT is supported by a Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship.

References (32)

  • J. Blodgett et al.

    Frailty in relation to sedentary behaviours and moderate–vigorous physical activity

    Rev. Clin. Gerontol.

    (2014)
  • G.N. Healy et al.

    Television time and continuous metabolic risk in physically active adults

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (2008)
  • P.T. Katzmarzyk et al.

    Sitting time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (2009)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) et al.

    National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data

    (2014)
  • American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand

    Exercise and physical activity for older adults

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (1998)
  • C. Tudor-Locke et al.

    Revisiting how many steps are enough?

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (2008)
  • Cited by (149)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text