The role of acetaldehyde outside ethanol metabolism in the carcinogenicity of alcoholic beverages: Evidence from a large chemical survey

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2008.05.034Get rights and content

Abstract

Acetaldehyde is a volatile compound naturally found in alcoholic beverages, and it is regarded as possibly being carcinogenic to humans (IARC Group 2B). Acetaldehyde formed during ethanol metabolism is generally considered as a source of carcinogenicity in alcoholic beverages. However, no systematic data is available about its occurrence in alcoholic beverages and the carcinogenic potential of human exposure to this directly ingested form of acetaldehyde outside ethanol metabolism. In this study, we have analysed and evaluated a large sample collective of different alcoholic beverages (n = 1555). Beer (9 ± 7 mg/l, range 0–63 mg/l) had significantly lower acetaldehyde contents than wine (34 ± 34 mg/l, range 0–211 mg/l), or spirits (66 ± 101 mg/l, range 0–1159 mg/l). The highest acetaldehyde concentrations were generally found in fortified wines (118 ± 120 mg/l, range 12–800 mg/l). Assuming an equal distribution between the beverage and saliva, the residual acetaldehyde concentrations in the saliva after swallowing could be on average 195 μM for beer, 734 μM for wine, 1387 μM for spirits, or 2417 μM for fortified wine, which are above levels previously regarded as potentially carcinogenic. Further research is needed to confirm the carcinogenic potential of directly ingested acetaldehyde. Until then, some possible preliminary interventions include the reduction of acetaldehyde in the beverages by improvement in production technology or the use of acetaldehyde binding additives. A re-evaluation of the ‘generally recognized as safe’ status of acetaldehyde is also required, which does not appear to be in agreement with its toxicity and carcinogenicity.

Introduction

Acetaldehyde (ethanal, CH3CHO) is a potent volatile flavouring compound found in many beverages and foods (Liu and Pilone, 2000). Acetaldehyde at low levels gives a pleasant fruity aroma, but at high concentrations it possesses a pungent irritating odour (Miyake and Shibamoto, 1993). In alcoholic beverages, acetaldehyde may be formed by yeast, acetic acid bacteria, and coupled auto-oxidation of ethanol and phenolic compounds (Liu and Pilone, 2000). Acetaldehyde is extremely reactive and readily binds to proteins, specifically to the peptide glutathione or to individual amino acids to generate various flavour compounds (Liu and Pilone, 2000, Miyake and Shibamoto, 1993).

According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), there is sufficient evidence in animals to demonstrate carcinogenicity of acetaldehyde and therefore it is possibly carcinogenic to humans also (Group 2B) (IARC, 1999). In a recent IARC meeting, acetaldehyde was discussed in the context of the carcinogenicity of alcoholic beverages. The IARC working group agreed that substantial mechanistic evidence in humans deficient in aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) indicates that acetaldehyde derived from the metabolism of ethanol in alcoholic beverages contributes to causing malignant oesophageal tumours (Baan et al., 2007, IARC, in press). Acetaldehyde is able to cause point mutations or to form covalent bonds with DNA, leading to carcinogenesis (Cheng et al., 2003, Fang and Vaca, 1997, Hecht et al., 2001, Noori and Hou, 2001, Wang et al., 2000). Recent experimental evidence shows that acetaldehyde can form mutagenic adducts in cellular concentrations of 100 μM and above (Theruvathu et al., 2005). This is in accordance with findings in man, which show that salivary acetaldehyde concentrations after a moderate dose of alcohol range between 18 and 143 μM within 40 min of alcohol ingestion (Homann et al., 1997a). The mutagenic and carcinogenic changes caused by acetaldehyde can already occur with an acetaldehyde concentration from 40 to 200 μmol/l (Homann et al., 1997a, Salaspuro et al., 2002).

Furthermore, acetaldehyde interferes with DNA repair mechanisms by inhibiting repair enzymes (Espina et al., 1988). Additionally, genetic epidemiological studies provide strong evidence that the heterozygous genotype (ALDH2∗1/∗2) contributes substantially to the development of oesophageal cancer related to alcohol consumption, with up to a 12 fold increase in risk for heavy drinkers in comparison to carriers of the homozygous ALDH2∗1/∗1 genotype (which encodes the active enzyme) (Lewis and Smith, 2005).

ALDH deficient humans have higher levels of acetaldehyde in their blood (Mizoi et al., 1979) and saliva (Väkeväinen et al., 2000) after drinking alcohol, and according to a recent study higher levels of acetaldehyde-related DNA adducts have been measured in their lymphocytes (Matsuda et al., 2006). After ingestion of a moderate dose of alcohol, salivary acetaldehyde concentrations are 2–3 times higher among ALDH2-deficient subjects than in those with the normal ALDH2 enzyme, which is associated with a remarkably increased risk for digestive tract cancers (Salaspuro, 2003b, Väkeväinen et al., 2000).

In addition to acetaldehyde metabolism in the gastrointestinal tract and in the liver, the oral and colonic bacterial flora may considerably contribute to an accumulation of acetaldehyde (Homann et al., 1997a, Homann et al., 1997b, Homann, 2001, Jokelainen et al., 1996a, Jokelainen et al., 1996b, Kurkivuori et al., 2007, Salaspuro, 2003a, Väkeväinen et al., 2000, Väkeväinen et al., 2001). For this reason, poor dental status or lacking oral hygiene are associated with a higher risk for cancer of the upper gastrointestinal tract (Homann et al., 2000a, Homann et al., 2000b, Homann et al., 2001). In addition, chronic alcohol abuse may lead to atrophy of the parotid glands and reduced saliva flow, which aids local acetaldehyde accumulation (Salaspuro, 2003b).

In summary, the IARC working group confirmed that alcoholic beverages are ‘carcinogenic to humans’ (Group 1) and concluded that the occurrence of malignant tumours of the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, oesophagus, liver, colorectum, and female breast is causally related to alcohol consumption (Baan et al., 2007, IARC, in press).

During the IARC meeting, an absence of information about acetaldehyde outside ethanol metabolism was noted. There are indications that consumption of spirits with exceptionally high concentrations of acetaldehyde might lead to an increased risk for cancer of the oesophagus (Linderborg et al., 2008). However, there are no systematic and actual data available about the occurrence of acetaldehyde in alcoholic beverages to evaluate its carcinogenic potential.

In this study, we collected novel data on the acetaldehyde content of a large collection of different alcoholic beverages (over 1500 samples). The data was statistically evaluated to find differences between sub-groups (i.e. beer, wine, fortified wine and spirits), as well as to estimate the typical ingested amount of acetaldehyde and its possible concentrations in saliva after ingestion. Finally, we provide a risk analysis for acetaldehyde outside ethanol metabolism and propose intervention measures.

Section snippets

Samples

Between January 2000 and March 2008, 1555 alcoholic beverages submitted to the CVUA Karlsruhe were routinely analysed for acetaldehyde. Our institute covers as a part in official food control the district of Karlsruhe in North Baden (Germany), which has a population of approximately 2.7 million. The samples were randomly selected either directly at the breweries, distilleries and wineries or from retail trade by governmental food inspectors. The samples were stored at 8 °C in the original

Results

The determined acetaldehyde levels in alcoholic beverages are presented in Table 1.

For beer and wine no significant differences were found in sub-groups (e.g. bottom- and top-fermented beers, red and white wine). In the fortified wines, sherry had significantly higher acetaldehyde concentration than port wine or other fortified wines (including Madeira, Marsala and some fortified wines from Greece and Eastern Europe). The spirit groups also showed significant differences. For example, the

General aspects

Acetaldehyde arises as normal by-product of yeast fermentation. Therefore, acetaldehyde was found as a natural constituent in the types of alcoholic beverages investigated. Acetaldehyde levels are dependent on the fermentation conditions, e.g. temperature, O2 levels, pH, SO2 levels, and yeast nutrient availability (Ebeler and Spaulding, 1998). While sugar is the primary substrate of acetaldehyde formation, metabolism of amino acids such as alanine, or oxidation of ethanol also contributes to

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank M. Fuchs, S. Gonzalez, H. Heger, M. Jaworski, U. Konrad and S. Schubert for excellent technical assistance. S. Nagel is thanked for the thorough compilation of the analytical data.

References (99)

  • D.W. Lachenmeier et al.

    Rapid determination of alcoholic strength of egg liqueur using steam distillation and oscillation-type densimetry with peristaltic pumping

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2005)
  • K. Linderborg et al.

    Potential mechanism for Calvados-related oesophageal cancer

    Food Chem. Toxicol.

    (2008)
  • J. Mangas et al.

    Changes in the major volatile compounds of cider distillates during maturation

    LWT Food Sci. Technol.

    (1996)
  • Y. Mizoi et al.

    Relationship between facial flushing and blood acetaldehyde levels after alcohol intake

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1979)
  • R.F. Nascimento et al.

    Qualitative and quantitative high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of aldehydes in Brazilian sugar cane spirits and other distilled alcoholic beverages

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (1997)
  • J.P. Osborne et al.

    Acetaldehyde metabolism by wine lactic acid bacteria

    FEMS Microbiol. Lett.

    (2000)
  • P. Romano et al.

    Acetaldehyde production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeasts

    FEMS Microbiol. Lett.

    (1994)
  • M.T. Rota et al.

    Reduction of oral acetaldehyde levels using a controlled-release chlorhexidine chip as a prevention strategy against upper digestive tract cancer

    Med. Hypotheses

    (2003)
  • M.P. Salaspuro

    Alcohol consumption and cancer of the gastrointestinal tract

    Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol.

    (2003)
  • J. Bakker et al.

    The mechanism of color changes in aging port wine

    Am. J. Enol. Vitic.

    (1986)
  • M. Begoña Cortes et al.

    Response of the aroma fraction in sherry wines subjected to accelerated biological aging

    J. Agric. Food Chem.

    (1999)
  • D.E. Briggs et al.

    Brewing: Science and Practice

    (2004)
  • G. Cheng et al.

    Reactions of formaldehyde plus acetaldehyde with deoxyguanosine and DNA: formation of cyclic deoxyguanosine adducts and formaldehyde cross-links

    Chem. Res. Toxicol.

    (2003)
  • M.J. Claus et al.

    Fruit brandy production by batch column distillation with reflux

    J. Food Process Eng.

    (2005)
  • M.B. Cortes et al.

    Changes in aroma compounds of sherry wines during their biological aging carried out by Saccharomyces cerevisiae races bayanus and capensis

    J. Agric. Food Chem.

    (1998)
  • S. Cortés et al.

    Evolution in the concentration of aldehydes, acetals and acetates during the refining of spirits

    Deut. Lebensm. Rundsch.

    (2003)
  • E. Coton et al.

    Microbiological origin of “framboisé” in French ciders

    J. Inst. Brew.

    (2003)
  • Q. Dai et al.

    Fluorine substituent effects on alkoxide chemistry and orientation on the Cu(100) surface

    J. Phys. Chem.

    (1993)
  • H.H. Dittrich et al.

    The SO2-content, SO2-binding substances and malo-lactic fermentation in German wines. An investigation on 544 German wines

    Vitic. Enol. Sci.

    (1984)
  • S.E. Ebeler et al.

    Characterization and measurement of aldehydes in wine

  • N. Espina et al.

    In vitro and in vivo inhibitory effect of ethanol and acetaldehyde on O 6-methylguanine transferase

    Carcinogenesis

    (1988)
  • European Commission, 1999. Commission Decision of 23 February 1999 adopting a register of flavouring substances used in...
  • European Commission, 2000. Commission Regulation (EC) No 2870/2000 laying down Community reference methods for the...
  • European Parliament and Council, 2008. Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15...
  • J.L. Fang et al.

    Detection of DNA adducts of acetaldehyde in peripheral white blood cells of alcohol abusers

    Carcinogenesis

    (1997)
  • FDA. 2003. Code of Federal Regulations - 21CFR182. Substances generally recognized as safe.:...
  • W. Frank

    Qualitätssicherung, Organisation und Analysenmethoden

  • N. Homann

    Alcohol and upper gastrointestinal tract cancer: the role of local acetaldehyde production

    Addict. Biol.

    (2001)
  • N. Homann et al.

    High acetaldehyde levels in saliva after ethanol consumption: methodological aspects and pathogenetic implications

    Carcinogenesis

    (1997)
  • N. Homann et al.

    Effects of acetaldehyde on cell regeneration and differentiation of the upper gastrointestinal tract mucosa

    J. Natl. Cancer Inst.

    (1997)
  • N. Homann et al.

    Increased salivary acetaldehyde levels in heavy drinkers and smokers: a microbiological approach to oral cavity cancer

    Carcinogenesis

    (2000)
  • N. Homann et al.

    Microbially produced acetaldehyde from ethanol may increase the risk of colon cancer via folate deficiency

    Int. J. Cancer

    (2000)
  • IARC. 1999. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, vol. 71, Acetaldehyde. Lyon, France:...
  • IARC. in press. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, vol. 96, Alcoholic Beverage...
  • International Programme on Chemical Safety, 1995. Acetaldehyde. Environmental Health Criteria 167. World Health...
  • R.S. Jackson

    Wine Science: Principles, Practice, Perception

    (2000)
  • JECFA. 2001. Summary of evaluations performed by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives: Acetaldehyde.:...
  • K. Jokelainen et al.

    High intracolonic acetaldehyde values produced by a bacteriocolonic pathway for ethanol oxidation in piglets

    Gut

    (1996)
  • K. Jokelainen et al.

    In vitro alcohol dehydrogenase-mediated acetaldehyde production by aerobic bacteria representing the normal colonic flora in man

    Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.

    (1996)
  • Cited by (148)

    • Non-Saccharomyces yeasts for beer production: Insights into safety aspects and considerations

      2022, International Journal of Food Microbiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      An Italian risk assessment has revealed that the highest exposure to acetaldehyde was through consumption of wine with 0.15 mg/kg body weight per day, followed by beer with 0.02 mg/kg body weight per day (Paiano et al., 2014). A German study found that the acetaldehyde concentration was 9 mg/L in commercial beers, comprising the lowest concentration among spirits and wine (Lachenmeier and Sohnius, 2008). According to the published data, the production of acetaldehyde appears to be strain-dependent, as variable values were found for different strains for both Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces yeasts (Table 2).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text