Elsevier

European Journal of Cancer

Volume 40, Issue 12, August 2004, Pages 1810-1811
European Journal of Cancer

Statement
The Hamburg statement: the partnership driving the European agenda on breast cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2004.04.020Get rights and content

Introduction

Breast cancer is the commonest cancer and the most frequent cause of cancer death in women throughout Europe. However, mortality from breast cancer is decreasing as a result of concerted action by all parties involved (women at risk, doctors, nurses, researchers, patients, journalists etc.). Partnership is paying off. Increasing numbers of breast cancer patients may nowadays achieve a normal life expectancy [1].

All previous European Breast Cancer Conferences produced Statements that became important tools in communicating with politicians and the media and we want to continue building upon this successful approach. Previous statements (Florence, Brussels and Barcelona) addressed the importance of screening programmes, translational research, patient involvement, risk assessment and the need for breast cancer to be managed in multi-disciplinary clinics (breast units) according to the guidelines recently approved by the European Parliament [2]. The Fourth European Breast Cancer Conference in Hamburg reached a consensus on key issues during the closing plenary session on the 20th March 2004. Clinicians, scientists, advocates and health-care consumers representing 3599 participants used a computerised voting system to formulate the Hamburg Statement.

The delegates of the 4th European Breast Cancer Conference wish to give priority to the following four areas:

Section snippets

Academic research

Excessively rigid legislation, unjustifiable administrative restrictions and government budget cuts are threatening cancer research in general, and breast cancer research in particular. In addition, the new European Directive on clinical trials might exacerbate this by leaving cancer research almost entirely to the initiative of the pharmaceutical industry. Whilst not denying the contribution of those pharmaceutical companies engaged in new drug development, the participants in the 4th European

Individual risk assessment

Women increasingly want to know about their individual risk of developing breast cancer [5]. All breast units should put in place special clinics for the assessment of individual risk and develop research in the field. Counselling should include a discussion of all proven risk-reducing measures, their availability within the relevant health-care system and assistance in privacy protection. As risk-reducing interventions are being developed, the issue of their availability, at no cost to the

Age limits

Most diagnostic and treatment protocols and procedures in breast cancer have age limits, but evidence is lacking for most of these limits. The 4th European Breast Cancer Conference wishes to draw attention to the growing size of the elderly population and their special needs, and proposes that participation in clinical trials is decided according to physiological status rather than age and that no upper age limit is laid down in the design of standard prevention and treatment plans.

Care after breast cancer

The 4th European Breast Cancer Conference recognises the need to redefine the concept of care for breast cancer patients after primary treatment. Routine continuous follow-up, as currently practised, does not serve women well. Care after breast cancer should not just aim at detecting local relapse and second primary tumours, but should also include psychological support and the management of treatment side-effects.

On the other hand, no consensus seems to exist on the duration and frequency of

Conclusions

Breast cancer incidence is increasing, and deserves priority. The four aspects addressed in this document: academic research, assessment of individual risk, breast cancer in the elderly and care after breast cancer represent major issues in breast cancer management. Research is fuelling progress, and clinical trials and translational research must be supported. Increasing knowledge of risk assessment should be translated into comprehensive individualised approaches. Better care should be

Acknowledgements

The authors thank P. Therasse, H. Meijers-Heijboer, M. Aapro and N. Roche for their input to the statement and their participation in the Final Round Table Session at EBCC-4. This Statement is also endorsed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Task Force Cancer in Elderly (EORTC TFE) and the International Society for Geriatric Oncology (SIOG). The authors gratefully acknowledge the valuable contribution of Kris Vantongelen (Conference and Project Manager, Federation

References (5)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (17)

  • Surveillance of women with a personal history of breast cancer by tumour subtype

    2017, Clinical Radiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    One in eight women will develop a primary breast cancer (PBC) in their lifetime.1

  • Optimising the care of primary breast cancer in older women-potential for a dedicated service

    2010, Journal of Geriatric Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The “Brussels Statement” in 2001 emphasised the need for breast cancer diagnosis and care to be carried out in accredited breast units that practice according to set guidelines 14. This has consistently been re-iterated in further updates of these statements 15,16 and is increasingly adopted in various countries throughout Europe 6,17. The United States has seen the emergence and evolution of multidisciplinary breast cancer care through “Comprehensive Breast Centres” over the last 30 years 18.

  • EUSOMA accreditation of breast units

    2006, European Journal of Cancer
  • Multidisciplinary breast units

    2012, Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text