Cigarette smoking and cancer incidence risk in adult men: National Health Insurance Corporation Study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdp.2004.08.006Get rights and content

Abstract

We analyzed risk while adjusting for age, body mass index, frequency of moderate physical activity, alcohol consumption, preference for vegetables versus meats, and frequency of meat consumption in a multivariate analysis and based our findings on not mortality data but incidence data. 733,134 Korean men who were 30 years old or older, insured by the National Health Insurance Corporation, and had a medical evaluation in 1996 were included in the study and followed up through 2000. During the 4-year follow-up period of 3,590,872 person–years, we identified 7204 new cases. We used the Cox proportional hazards model to estimate adjusted relative risks (aRRs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The association of current cigarette smoking was significantly stronger as compared with never smokers; aRR was 1.49 (95% CI = 1.39–1.59) for all cancers, 4.46 (2.32–8.57) for esophageal, 3.83 (2.97–4.94) for lung, 3.01 (1.58–5.72) for laryngeal, 2.24 (1.48–3.39) for urinary bladder, 1.62 (1.42–1.84) for gastric, 1.75 (1.12–2.74) for oral and pharyngeal, 1.58 (0.97–2.27) for pancreatic, and 1.50 (1.29–1.74) for liver cancer. Our findings, based on incidence data, confirmed that differences in smoking habit were responsible for most of the differences observed in smoking-related cancers.

Introduction

Epidemiologic studies have consistently shown an association between smoking and cancer of the lung, larynx, mouth, esophagus, urinary bladder, kidney, pancreas, and cervix [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Several reports also suggest an association between smoking and cancer of the stomach, liver, colon, and rectum [8], [9], [10]. Most large cohort studies collect detailed smoking histories, but variable information on other potential risk factors. Consultants for the tobacco industry have speculated that confounding may cause studies to exaggerate the risks attributed to smoking [11], although there is little evidence that this is occurs. Recently, US Cancer Prevention Study (CPS) II suggested that multiple covariates had little impact on the relative and attributable risk for cancer mortality after adjustments were made for age and sex [12]. Since that study was based on cancer mortality data, the effect of smoking on cancer incidence may have been confounded by its effect on other fatal diseases, such as cardiovascular disease [13]. Fewer large prospective studies have assessed the disease risks associated with smoking in Asia, where the widespread consumption of manufactured cigarettes began more recently than in North American and Northern Europe. Our study has the additional strengths of being able to measure cancer incidence, which is informative for sites with higher survival rates, and ability to control for several other major potential risk factors. It is uncertain whether the CPS II results are applicable to groups with different genetic and environmental backgrounds [11], [14].

In Korea, the National Health Insurance Corporation (NHIC) has been providing health insurance to government employees and teachers since 1980 along with biennial health examinations that include height, weight, and blood pressure measurements, chest radiography, blood counts, and blood chemistries. In addition, a self-administered questionnaire collects information regarding medical history, current health status, and individual life styles regarding tobacco and alcohol consumption, dietary preferences, and leisure-time physical activity.

To analysis the association of smoking with the incidence of all cancers and the cancers of major organ sites for age, body mass index, frequency of moderate physical activity, alcohol consumption, preference for vegetables versus meats, and frequency of meat consumption, we performed National Health Insurance cohort study.

Section snippets

Cohort and follow-up

The study subjects derived from 1,228,817 (980,841 men and 337,426 women) government employees and teachers who participated in a national health examination program begun in 1996, and they constituted the cohort for the National Health Insurance Cooperation Study. The NIHC permitted us to use their data for the present study. We excluded women from the present study because their smoking rate was too low (0.3% of the study population), and we excluded 165,915 men who were less than 30 years

Results

Among the 733,134 subjects, 404,483 (55.2%) were current smokers, 164,204 (22.4%) former smokers, and 164,447 (22.4%) never smokers. Among the current smokers, 16.1, 62.8, and 21.1% smoked 1–9, 10–19, and 20 or more cigarettes per day, respectively, and smoking duration was 1–19 years (58.6%), 20–29 years (28.4%), and 30 years or more (13.0%). Among former smokers, 82.2% reported that they had smoked for 1–19 years, 13.3% for 20–29 years, and 4.5% for 30 years or more.

Table 1 shows the smoking

Discussion

In this large cohort study based on incidence data, as in similar studies based on mortality data, lung, esophageal, laryngeal, urinary bladder, oral and pharyngeal, stomach, pancreatic, and liver cancer in Korean men were associated with smoking. After adjusting for age, the proportion of all cancers that were attributable to smoking was 30.4%, and further adjustments for body mass index, frequency of moderate physical activity, alcohol consumption, preference for vegetables versus meats, and

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the help provided by the Korean Central Cancer Registry (KCCR) and those of six regional cancer registries (Seoul, Busan, Incheon, Daejeon, Kwangju, and Daegu).

References (53)

  • M. Miyamoto et al.

    CYP2A6 gene deletion reduces susceptibility to lung cancer

    Biochem Biophys Res Commun

    (1999)
  • E.L. Wynder et al.

    Tobacco smoking as a possible etiologic factor in bronchogenic carcinoma

    JAMA

    (1950)
  • M.L. Levin et al.

    Cancer and tobacco smoking

    JAMA

    (1950)
  • H.A. Kahn

    The Dorn study of smoking and mortality among US veterans. Report on eight and one-half years of observation

  • R. Doll et al.

    Mortality in relation to smoking: 20 years’ observations on male British doctors

    BMJ

    (1976)
  • R. Doll et al.

    Mortality in relation to smoking: 22 years’ observations on female British doctors

    BMJ

    (1980)
  • E.C. Hammond et al.

    Smoking and death rates – report on forty-four months of follow-up of 187,783 menII. Death rates by cause

    JAMA

    (1958)
  • S. Akiba et al.

    Cigarette smoking and cancer mortality risk in Japanese men and women-results form reanalysis of the six prefecture cohort study data

    Environ Health Perspect

    (1990)
  • US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Smoking and Health Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon...
  • International Agency for Research on Cancer IARC Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, vol. 38....
  • Thun MJ, Day-Lally C, Myers DG, et al. Trends in tobacco smoking and mortality from cigarette use in Cancer Prevention...
  • T.D. Sterling et al.

    Risk attribution and tobacco-related deaths

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1993)
  • M.J. Thun et al.

    Smoking vs. other risk factors as the cause of smoking-attributable deaths: confounding in the courtroom

    JAMA

    (2000)
  • J.A. Baron et al.

    Tobacco

  • R. Doll et al.

    Mortality in relation to smoking: 40 years’ observations on male British doctors

    Br Med J

    (1994)
  • International classification of disease for oncology

    (1990)
  • Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea. Annual report of Korea Central Cancer Registry program, January–December 2000....
  • Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry: report of a WHO Expert Committee

    World Health Organization

    (1995)
  • S. Tsugane et al.

    Salt and salted food intake and subsequent risk of gastric cancer among middle-aged Japanese men and women

    Br J Cancer

    (2004)
  • P.A. Van den Brandt et al.

    Salt intake, cured meat consumption, refrigerator use and stomach cancer incidence: a prospective cohort study (Netherlands)

    Cancer Causes Control

    (2003)
  • S. Xibin et al.

    Residential environment, diet and risk of stomach cancer: a case-control study in Linzhou, China

    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev

    (2002)
  • K.J. Rothman et al.

    Modern epidemiology

    (1998)
  • Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea. 1998 Korea Health Survey – Summary Report. Seoul: Ministry of Health and...
  • SAS. SAS/STAT software: changes and enhancement through release 8.1. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.;...
  • M. Hara et al.

    Smoking and risk of premature death among middle-aged Japanese: ten-year follow-up of the Japan Public Heath Center-based prospective study on cancer and cardiovascular disease (JPHC Study) cohort I

    Jpn J Cancer Res

    (2002)
  • J. Tredaniel et al.

    Tobacco smoking and gastric cancer: review and meta-analysis

    Int J Cancer

    (1999)
  • Cited by (63)

    • Threshold dose–response association between smoking pack-years and the risk of gallbladder cancer: A nationwide cohort study

      2023, European Journal of Cancer
      Citation Excerpt :

      A recent meta-analysis, including 11 case–control and 9 cohort studies, reported that current smokers had increased GBC risk (pooled relative risk, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.17–1.51) [24]; however, the meta-analysis has some significant limitations. Of the nine cohort studies in the meta-analysis, five assessed the association between smoking and biliary tract cancer risk without separating GBC from other biliary tract cancers [25–29]. Considering the pathobiological heterogeneity of biliary tract cancers, GBC risk should be evaluated separately from that of other biliary tract cancers.

    • Low-level arsenic exposure from drinking water is associated with prostate cancer in Iowa

      2017, Environmental Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Poverty rate indicates the percentage of population below the federal poverty level based on household size and income (Proctor et al., 2016). Information on general cancer risk factors, including tobacco smoking rate (current smoker), binge drinking rate (5 or more drinks an occasion during the past 30 days), and obesity rate (BMI ≥ 30) in each county for 1997–2013 was acquired from the Iowa Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) through a research agreement with the Iowa Department of Public Health (Park et al., 2006; Samanic et al., 2004; Thun et al., 1997; Yun et al., 2005). These data were also restricted to the white male population at the county level.

    • The Liver: General Aspects and Epidemiology

      2017, Liver Pathophysiology: Therapies and Antioxidants
    • Epidemiology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

      2015, Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      A prospective cohort study in Japan91 that followed 4050 men older than 40 years for a mean of 9 years found a 3-fold increased risk of primary liver cancer in current smokers compared with nonsmokers, in a non–dose-dependent manner. A 2005 study from Korea92 that looked at 733,134 men followed over a 4-year period found an adjusted RR of 1.53 (95% CI 1.30–1.79) for former smokers and 1.50 (95% CI 1.29–1.74) for current smokers, although this study did not take into account hepatitis status. A prospective case-control study from Michigan51 looking at 210 patients with HCC found an increased risk of HCC in tobacco smokers with greater than 20 pack-years compared with cirrhotic patients without HCC (OR 4.9; 95% CI 2.2–10.6) as well as compared with patients with no underlying liver disease (OR 63.7; 95% CI 16.7–144.2).

    • Adverse health outcomes associated with surgical management of the small renal mass

      2014, Journal of Urology
      Citation Excerpt :

      BCCs were chosen not to study disease behavior but because they undergo periodic cancer surveillance in a manner similar to that seen in patients with RCC. However, one could argue these patients are less healthy due to a higher incidence of smoking,24 which is poorly characterized using SEER-Medicare.16 Due to these concerns we believed both controls were informative, with true risk estimates potentially lying between both controls.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text