Original Articles
Low Prevalence of Long-Term Complications in Non–Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus in France: A Multicenter Study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1056-8727(97)98005-3Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of long-term complications in a large sample of French NIDDM patients. Therefore, 427 NIDDM patients 35–74 years old were recruited in ten centers. Standardized clinical criteria and central reading for retinal and electrocardiographic changes were used to assess the presence of complications. The prevalence rates of complications were 29.7% and 3.3% for background and proliferative retinopathy; 21.8%, 6.1%, and 2.8% for microalbuminuria, proteinuria, and renal insufficiency; 19.9 and 11.7% for asymptomatic and symptomatic pheripheral neuropathy; 8.2% for orthostatic hypotension; 10.1% and 8.4% for angina pectoris and myocardial infarction; and 13.1% and 6.3% for mild and moderate to severe peripheral vascular disease, respectively. In conclusion, prevalence rates in this study were lower than in most studies from other countries.

Introduction

The risk (and costs) linked with diabetes mellitus lies essentially in its long-term complications (retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, and cardiovascular diseases). Non–insulindependent diabetic (NIDDM) patients have been shown to experience an important excess of cardiovascular mortality.[1]Moreover, NIDDM patients represent an important proportion of the cases of endstage renal disease2 and blindness,3, 4and they experience lower-limb amputation up to ten times more often than nondiabetic subjects,[5]because of the joint effects of neuropathy and peripheral vascular disease. Thus, NIDDM is an important issue in Public Health.

The CODIAB study is the first study in France assessing the prevalence rates of complications in a multicenter sample of NIDDM patients, with standardization of the diagnosis of complications.

Section snippets

Study Sample

Seven departments of internal medicine in regional hospitals, one University center in Paris and two private diabetologists participated in the study. Between April 1989 and May 1992, 540 diabetic outpatients, consulting regularly in the centers, were recruited. Inclusion criteria for NIDDM patients were (1) age 35–74 years, (2) duration of diabetes greater than 1 year, and (3) treatment with diet and/or oral antidiabetic drugs and/or secondarily with insulin (at least 2 years after the

Results

The characteristics of the CODIAB sample are shown in Table 2; it included 200 women and 227 men, i.e., 53% of men. As could be awaited for type II diabetic patients, they had been diagnosed in middle age (mean age at diagnosis, 46 years), were treated mostly by oral antidiabetic agents and were overweight: 56% of men and 77% of women were obese (BMI greater than 27 kg/m2 in men and 25 kg/m2 in women). Finally, glycemic control was not satisfactory: 54% of the patients had a fasting blood

Prevalence of Complications

The prevalence rates of the different complications in our study were among the lowest found in the literature. It is necessary to examine whether methodological flaws might have produced an underestimation of the prevalences. First of all, the analysis of the characteristics of our patients shows that this can hardly be due to our sampling methods. As no diabetes registry exists in France, our concern was to constitute a sample of diabetic patients as representative as possible. The

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study suggests that the French population may be protected against the most severe forms of NIDDM; insulin therapy is less frequently required than in the United States and in Northern Europe, and correspondingly, prevalence of retinopathy and nephropathy are lower. Cardiovascular diseases may also be less prevalent, like in the general French population.

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by ZENECA PHARMA-France. This study was supported by the Société de Secours des Amis de la Science.

References (44)

  • PG Wiles et al.

    Vibration perception thresholdinfluence of age, height, sex, and smoking, and calculation of accurate centile values

    Diabetic Med

    (1991)
  • R Klein et al.

    The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of diabetic retinopathy. III. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 or more years

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1984)
  • MW Knuiman et al.

    Prevalence of diabetic complications in relation to risk factors

    Diabetes

    (1986)
  • SM Haffner et al.

    Diabetic retinopathy in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites

    Diabetes

    (1988)
  • RF Hamman et al.

    Prevalence and risk factors of diabetic retinopathy in non-hispanic whites and hispanics with NIDDM, San Luis Valley Diabetes Study

    Diabetes

    (1989)
  • QZ Liu et al.

    Glycated haemoglobin, plasma glucose and diabetic retinopathyCross-sectional and prospective analyses

    Diabetologia

    (1993)
  • PJ Dyck et al.

    The prevalence by staged severity of various type of diabetic neuropathy, retinopathy and nephropathy in a population-based cohortThe Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study

    Neurology

    (1993)
  • KM West et al.

    A detailed study of risk factors for retinopathy and nephropathy in diabetes

    Diabetes

    (1980)
  • A Schmitz et al.

    MicroalbuminuriaA major risk factor in non-insulin-dependent diabetes. A 10-year follow-up study of 503 patients

    Diabetic Med

    (1988)
  • MA Gall et al.

    Prevalence of micro- and macroalbuminuria, arterial hypertension, retinopathy and large vessel disease in European type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients

    Diabetologia

    (1991)
  • S Verhoeven et al.

    Impact of late complications in type 2 diabetes in a Dutch population

    Diabetic Med

    (1991)
  • O Descamps et al.

    Etude de la microalbuminurie dans une population de 653 patients diabétiques de type 1 et 2

    Diabete Metab

    (1991)
  • Cited by (54)

    • Molecular mechanism of diabetic neuropathy and its pharmacotherapeutic targets

      2018, European Journal of Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Nicolucci and co-workers reported about 12–50% of diabetic patients develop some degree of diabetic neuropathy in US (Nicolucci et al., 1996). Considering the impact of age on nerve function, age is regarded as a potential risk factor of diabetic neuropathy (Papanas and Zeigler, 2015); however, Delcourt et al. reported there is no correlation between diabetic neuropathy and age (Delcourt et al., 1998). In a study at a Bulgarian hospital, diabetic women were found to have higher macrovascular risk than diabetic men (Kamenov et al., 2010).

    • Diabetes in Europe: An update

      2014, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      The prevalence of PNP in type 2 diabetes varies between 18% and 35% for European study populations [89–98]. In general, reported prevalence rates are somewhat higher for hospital-based study populations [90–92,94] than for primary care or population-based samples [89,96,97]. There is much less data on the occurrence of polyneuropathy in patients with undiagnosed diabetes screened by OGTT on population-level [99–101].

    • Epidemiology of polyneuropathy in diabetes and prediabetes

      2014, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, diagnostic criteria for DSPN often include other parameters, such as clinical signs, monofilament sensitivity and electrophysiology, which are not adjusted for age. Interestingly, in a study from France, where VPT was adjusted for age, height and gender, there was no relationship between neuropathy and age (Delcourt et al., 1998). Data from Mauritius confirmed the increase in VPT with age in both diabetic and nondiabetic subjects (Shaw et al., 1998).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text