Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 373, Issue 9674, 2–8 May 2009, Pages 1532-1542
The Lancet

Articles
Recombinant human erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and mortality in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis of randomised trials

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60502-XGet rights and content

Summary

Background

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents reduce anaemia in patients with cancer and could improve their quality of life, but these drugs might increase mortality. We therefore did a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials in which these drugs plus red blood cell transfusions were compared with transfusion alone for prophylaxis or treatment of anaemia in patients with cancer.

Methods

Data for patients treated with epoetin alfa, epoetin beta, or darbepoetin alfa were obtained and analysed by independent statisticians using fixed-effects and random-effects meta-analysis. Analyses were by intention to treat. Primary endpoints were mortality during the active study period and overall survival during the longest available follow-up, irrespective of anticancer treatment, and in patients given chemotherapy. Tests for interactions were used to identify differences in effects of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on mortality across prespecified subgroups.

Findings

Data from a total of 13 933 patients with cancer in 53 trials were analysed. 1530 patients died during the active study period and 4993 overall. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents increased mortality during the active study period (combined hazard ratio [cHR] 1·17, 95% CI 1·06–1·30) and worsened overall survival (1·06, 1·00–1·12), with little heterogeneity between trials (I2 0%, p=0·87 for mortality during the active study period, and I2 7·1%, p=0·33 for overall survival). 10 441 patients on chemotherapy were enrolled in 38 trials. The cHR for mortality during the active study period was 1·10 (0·98–1·24), and 1·04 (0·97–1·11) for overall survival. There was little evidence for a difference between trials of patients given different anticancer treatments (p for interaction=0·42).

Interpretation

Treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with cancer increased mortality during active study periods and worsened overall survival. The increased risk of death associated with treatment with these drugs should be balanced against their benefits.

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Medical Faculty of University of Cologne, and Oncosuisse (Switzerland).

Introduction

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents increase haemoglobin concentrations, reduce the need for red blood cell transfusions, and could improve quality of life in patients with cancer.1, 2, 3 However, they have been reported to increase the risk of thromboembolic events2, 4 and might stimulate tumour growth.5 Uncertainty remains about whether and how these drugs affect survival; their safety has been discussed repeatedly at hearings of the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency.4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Previous studies addressing this issue were literature-based meta-analyses of aggregated results that combined heterogeneous mortality endpoints and could not examine whether effects differed across subgroups—eg, patients with different haemoglobin concentrations at baseline.2, 3, 4 These limitations can be overcome in meta-analyses that are based on individual patient data, but up till now such meta-analyses have been small (230113 and 211214 patients), focused on epoetin beta or darbepoetin alfa, and were sponsored by the manufacturers.13, 14 Since erythropoiesis-stimulating drugs are widely used in patients with cancer, more definitive analyses of mortality in individuals randomly assigned to receive or not to receive these drugs are needed.

We therefore did a comprehensive meta-analysis that was based on the individual patient data from randomised controlled trials, including trials done by manufacturers of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and independent investigators. Our objectives were to examine the effects of these drugs on the survival of patients with cancer and to identify factors that might modify such effects.

Section snippets

Patients and study selection

Main analyses were defined in a peer-reviewed protocol15 and a statistical analysis plan, and main analyses were done independently in two academic departments. A steering committee consisting of clinicians and methodologists reviewed results and agreed on their interpretation.

In eligible studies, epoetin or darbepoetin plus red blood cell transfusions (as necessary) were compared with red blood cell transfusions (as necessary) alone to prevent or treat anaemia in adult or paediatric patients

Results

We identified 63 eligible studies and 53 (84%) contributed individual patient data (figure 1). Three manufacturers of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (Amgen, Johnson & Johnson, and Hoffmann-La Roche) and five independent investigators provided individual patient data.9, 22, 23, 24, 25 14 206 patients were included in the dataset; 273 (2%) were excluded for the following reasons: no study arm was allocated (n=164), they had leukaemia and were included in a separate stratum (n=98),26 or date of

Discussion

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents caused an estimated 17% increase in mortality relative to control during the active study periods in all patients with cancer and a 10% increase in relation to control in those undergoing chemotherapy. There was little evidence for differences in effects across different patient groups and trials. In particular, although mortality during the active study periods was less markedly increased in patients given chemotherapy than those given other treatments, this

References (91)

  • G Goss et al.

    Impact of maintaining Hb with epoetin alfa on time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), quality of life (QoL), and transfusion reduction in limited disease SCLC patients

    Lung Cancer

    (2005)
  • G Iconomou et al.

    Effect of recombinant human erythropoietin on quality of life in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: results of a randomized, controlled trial

    J Pain Symptom Manage

    (2003)
  • D Antonadou et al.

    Erythropoietin enhances radiation treatment efficacy in patients with pelvic malignancies. Final results of a randomized phase III study

    Eur J Cancer

    (2001)
  • A Phrommintikul et al.

    Mortality and target haemoglobin concentrations in anaemic patients with chronic kidney disease treated with erythropoietin: a meta-analysis

    Lancet

    (2007)
  • ND Vaziri

    Mechanism of erythropoietin-induced hypertension

    Am J Kidney Dis

    (1999)
  • PJ Stohlawetz et al.

    Effects of erythropoietin on platelet reactivity and thrombopoiesis in humans

    Blood

    (2000)
  • J Seidenfeld et al.

    Epoetin treatment of anemia associated with cancer therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2001)
  • J Bohlius et al.

    Recombinant human erythropoietins and cancer patients: updated meta-analysis of 57 studies including 9353 patients

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2006)
  • J Wilson et al.

    A systematic review and economic evaluation of epoetin alfa, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa in anaemia associated with cancer, especially that attributable to cancer treatment

    Health Technol Assess

    (2007)
  • CL Bennett et al.

    Venous thromboembolism and mortality associated with recombinant erythropoietin and darbepoetin administration for the treatment of cancer-associated anemia

    JAMA

    (2008)
  • M Henke et al.

    Do erythropoietin receptors on cancer cells explain unexpected clinical findings?

    J Clin Oncol

    (2006)
  • B Leyland-Jones et al.

    Maintaining normal hemoglobin levels with epoetin alfa in mainly nonanemic patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy: a survival study

    J Clin Oncol

    (2005)
  • J Overgaard et al.

    Randomized study of the importance of novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein (Aranesp) for the effect of radiotherapy in patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC)—the Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group DAHANCA 10 randomized trial

    Eur J Cancer

    (2007)
  • JR Wright et al.

    Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of erythropoietin in non-small-cell lung cancer with disease-related anemia

    J Clin Oncol

    (2007)
  • M Hedenus et al.

    Efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alfa in anaemic patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

    Br J Haematol

    (2003)
  • V Brower

    ESAs further restricted, but debate continues

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2008)
  • M Aapro et al.

    Effect of treatment with epoetin-beta on survival, tumour progression and thromboembolic events in patients with cancer: an updated meta-analysis of 12 randomised controlled studies including 2301 patients

    Br J Cancer

    (2008)
  • J Glaspy et al.

    Evaluation of the association between hemoglobin (Hb) events and safety outcomes in cancer patients (pts) with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA): an integrated analysis of patient-level data from 6 randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of darbepoetin alpha (DA)

    Eur J Cancer

    (2007)
  • J Bohlius et al.

    Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer—meta-analysis based on individual patient data (Protocol)

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2008)
  • MC Simmonds et al.

    Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice

    Clin Trials

    (2005)
  • M Egger et al.

    Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

    BMJ

    (1997)
  • M Egger et al.

    Rationale, potentials, and promise of systematic reviews

  • G Dunn et al.

    Estimating treatment effects from randomized clinical trials with noncompliance and loss to follow-up: the role of instrumental variable methods

    Stat Methods Med Res

    (2005)
  • DG Altman et al.

    Calculating the number needed to treat for trials where the outcome is time to an event

    BMJ

    (1999)
  • R Ihaka et al.

    R: a language for data analysis and graphics

    J Comput Graph Stat

    (1996)
  • V Moebus et al.

    The impact of epoetin-alpha on anemia, red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and survival in breast cancer patients (pts) treated with dose-dense sequential chemotherapy: Mature results of an AGO phase III study (ETC trial)

    J Clin Oncol

    (2007)
  • M Untch et al.

    PREPARE trial. A randomized phase III trial comparing preoperative, dose-dense, dose-intensified chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel and CMF with a standard dosed epirubicin/cyclophsophamide followed by paclitaxel +/− darbepoetin alfa in primary breast cancer: a preplanned interim analysis of efficacy at surgery

    J Clin Oncol

    (2008)
  • I Ray-Coquard et al.

    ELYPSE 4: a prospective randomized trial comparing Epo A in primary prophylaxis of severe anemia requiring red cells transfusion in high risk patients

    Ann Oncol

    (2006)
  • BI Razzouk et al.

    Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of quality of life, hematologic end points, and safety of weekly epoetin alfa in children with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy

    J Clin Oncol

    (2006)
  • J Vansteenkiste et al.

    Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III trial of darbepoetin alfa in lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2002)
  • R Pirker et al.

    Safety and efficacy of darbepoetin alpha in previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer treated with platinum plus etoposide

    J Clin Oncol

    (2008)
  • K Taylor et al.

    Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of darbepoetin alfa every 3 weeks for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia

    Blood

    (2005)
  • D Kotasek et al.

    Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study of darbepoetin alfa administered once every 3 (Q3W) or 4 (Q4W) weeks in patients with solid tumors

    Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol

    (2002)
  • M Aapro et al.

    Effect of once-weekly epoetin beta on survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving anthracycline- and/or taxane-based chemotherapy: results of the Breast Cancer-Anemia and the Value of Erythropoietin (BRAVE) study

    J Clin Oncol

    (2008)
  • J Chang et al.

    Weekly epoetin alfa maintains hemoglobin, improves quality of life, and reduces transfusion in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

    J Clin Oncol

    (2005)
  • Cited by (515)

    • Bloodless surgery in urologic oncology: A review of hematologic, anesthetic, and surgical considerations

      2023, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
      Citation Excerpt :

      ESAs do have associated risks as well as a black-box warning. Studies of ESAs in cancer-related anemia showed association with increased mortality, shortened overall survival, and increased thromboembolic events [57–61]. There is concern regarding ESAs and possible associated increased risk of tumor progression in clinical studies of patients with breast, non-small cell lung, head and neck, lymphoid, and cervical cancers [57,62–65].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text