Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 361, Issue 9360, 8 March 2003, Pages 809-813
The Lancet

Articles
Effect of short-term treatment with azithromycin on recurrent ischaemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome in the Azithromycin in Acute Coronary Syndrome (AZACS) trial: a randomised controlled trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12706-7Get rights and content

Summary

Background

There is serological and epidemiological evidence of an association between Chlamydia pneumoniae infection and coronary artery disease. Results of previous smaller studies have indicated a reduction of recurrent ischaemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome when given macrolide antibiotics. We aimed to assess whether short-term treatment with the macrolide antibiotic azithromycin reduces recurrent ischaemic events in patients admitted for unstable angina or myocardial infarction.

Methods

We assessed the effect of azithromycin in a multi-centre, double-blind randomised trial in 1439 patients with unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction. Patients were randomly allocated to receive 500 mg azithromycin on the first day after randomisation, followed by 250 mg daily for 4 days or placebo. Patients were followed up for 6 months. The primary endpoints were death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or recurrent ischaemia necessitating revascularisation. Analysis was done by intention to treat.

Findings

Treatment with azithromycin did not result in reduction of either individual endpoints or any of the primary endpoints. Of the 716 patients in the azithromycin group, 23 (3%) died, 17 (2%) developed myocardial infarction, 65 (9%) had recurrent ischaemia needing revascularisation, and 100 (14%) had one or more of these endpoints. In the placebo group (n=723) the corresponding numbers of patients were 24 (4%), 22 (3%), 59 (8%), and 106 (15%), respectively (p=0·664, 95% CI 0·72–1·24). 62 (9%) of patients in the azithromycin group and 59 (8%) in the placebo group reached the secondary endpoint of ischaemia or congestive heart failure necessitating admission (difference 0·5%, 95% CI 0·75–1·53; p=0·707). We recorded few side-effects.

Interpretation

Short-term treatment with azithromycin does not reduce development of recurrent events in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Introduction

Acute coronary syndrome results from plaque disruption and superimposed platelet and fibrin thrombus formation, leading to occlusion of the coronary artery.1 Despite widespread use of potent antiplatelet agents and statins, the rate of recurrent ischaemic events within the 2–6 months after an initial episode of acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina remains high, 12–20%.2, 3, 4 Vascular inflammation leading to plaque disruption and thrombus formation could be in part due to infection of the arterial wall, most notably with Chlamydia pneumoniae.5 Infection with this organism results in activation of prothrombotic and proinflammatory genes, such as tissue factor and adhesion molecules, creating a potential pathophysiological link between infection and acute coronary syndromes.6, 7 Results of initial studies, in which C pneumoniae was treated with azithromycin8, 9, 10 and roxithromycin11 suggested that patients with acute coronary syndrome who were given antibiotics had either reduced serum concentrations of markers of inflammation, or a reduction in recurrent ischaemic events. The results were not conclusive because of the small number of patients included in the studies.

In the Azithromycin in Acute Coronary Syndrome (AZACS) study, we aimed to determine whether short-term treatment with azithromycin, initiated shortly after presentation with acute coronary syndrome, reduces the occurrence of recurrent ischaemic events and death during the following 6 months.

Section snippets

Patients

We recruited patients from seven centres in Europe, Israel, and the USA. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older and admitted with unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction. Unstable angina was defined as admission with chest pain or discomfort consistent with myocardial ischaemia lasting for at least 5 min that occurred at rest, at least one episode within 24 h of admission, and one of the following findings: substantial electrocardiographic evidence of ischaemia, new

Results

We enrolled 1439 consecutive patients; 716 were randomly allocated to azithromycin and 723 to placebo. Figure 1 shows the trial profile. The mean time between the qualifying diagnosis and randomisation was 2·9 days (SD 3·1). Table 1 shows the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients.

The drugs taken by patients were much the same in the two groups at randomisation and at 6 months' follow-up (table 2). Fewer than 1% of patients had missing information for any drug.

The number of

Discussion

Our results over 6 months show that an early 5-day course of azithromycin after an acute coronary syndrome did not reduce the number of people who died or developed myocardial infarction, or ischaemic episodes needing percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft. Similarly, the frequency of recurrent ischaemia or congestive heart failure needing admission was also not affected by treatment with azithromycin.

Treatment with azithromycin also did not reduce adverse clinical

References (18)

  • SaikkuP et al.

    Serologic evidence of an association of a novel chlamydia, TWAR, with chronic coronary heart disease and acute myocardial infarction

    Lancet

    (1988)
  • GurfinkelE et al.

    Randomised trial of roxithromycin in non-Q-wave coronary syndromes: ROXIS pilot study

    Lancet

    (1997)
  • FalkE et al.

    Coronary plaque rupture

    Circulation

    (1995)
  • Risk of myocardial infarction and death during treatment with low dose aspirin and intravenous heparin in men with unstable coronary artery disease

    Lancet

    (1990)
  • CannonCP et al.

    Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndrome treated with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban

    N Engl J Med

    (2001)
  • SchwartzGG et al.

    Effects of atorvastatin on early recurrent ischemic events in acute coronary syndromes

    JAMA

    (2001)
  • KolA et al.

    Chlamydial and human heat shock protein localizes in human atheroma and regulates macrophage tumor necrosis factor- and matrix metalloproteinase expression

    Circulation

    (1998)
  • Van der WalAC et al.

    Site of intimal rupture or erosion of thrombosed coronary atherosclerotic plaques is characterized by an inflammatory process irrespective of the dominant plaque morphology

    Circulation

    (1994)
  • GuptaS et al.

    Elevated Chlamydia pneumoniae antibodies, cardiovascular events, and azithromycin in male survivors of myocardial infarction

    Circulation

    (1997)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (136)

  • Extrinsic and Intrinsic Responses in the Development and Progression of Atherosclerosis

    2021, Heart Lung and Circulation
    Citation Excerpt :

    Short-term treatment had no effect on any of the primary endpoints, including death, non-fatal MI or revascularisation procedures. Furthermore, in patients who were C. pneumoniae positive, there were no differences on any endpoint following treatment [18]. However, it is important to consider a recently published cohort study which found an increase in the incidence of both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular death in patients treated with azithromycin.

  • Non-anti-infective effects of antimicrobials and their clinical applications: A review

    2015, Mayo Clinic Proceedings
    Citation Excerpt :

    Similar results were seen in the Azithromycin in Acute Coronary Syndrome trial. A total of 1439 patients with unstable angina/acute MI received azithromycin (a short 5-day course) or placebo, with no difference in outcome as defined by death, recurrent MI, or recurrent ischemia necessitating revascularization at 6 months of follow-up.50 The WIZARD trial (Weekly Intervention With Zithromax for Atherosclerosis and Its Related Disorders) was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial with 7747 adults.

  • Vaccine for atherosclerosis

    2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Macrolides, Clindamycin, and Ketolides

    2014, Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases
  • Heat shock proteins and cardiovascular disease

    2014, Advances in Clinical Chemistry
    Citation Excerpt :

    A number of large clinical trial including the Weekly Intervention with Zithromax for Atherosclerosis and its Related Disorders (WIZARD), the Azithromycin in Acute Coronary Syndromes (AZACS), the Azithromycin and Coronary Events Study (ACES), and the Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (PROVE-IT-TIMI22) have investigated the effectiveness of different antibiotics and therapeutic regimens on the risk of CVD in patients with ischemic heart disease with or without serological evidence of C. pneumoniae infection. The evidence of a short-term reduction in the risk of CVD was weak and there was no evidence of a long-term reduction in these trials [21,45–47]. Antibiotic treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection was again inconsistent [48].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text