Brief Reports
Comparison of Tilt Angles and Provocative Agents (Edrophonium and Isoproterenol) to Improve Head-Upright Tilt-Table Testing

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00915-6Get rights and content

Section snippets

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgment:

We would like to thank Scott McKnite for his assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. We would also like to acknowledge the staff of the University of Minnesota Electrophysiology Laboratory without whom this study would not have been possible.

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

Cited by (30)

  • Early syncope detection during head up tilt test by analyzing interactions between cardio-vascular signals

    2016, Digital Signal Processing: A Review Journal
    Citation Excerpt :

    The HUTT started with 15 minutes of resting in a supine position (5 minutes of controlled breathing at 0.25 Hz), then the table (Sissel, Sautron, France) that has a foot-board support, was tilted at 80° for 45 minutes. No provocative drug was used [36]. The HUTT was considered as fainting-inducing if the subject developed syncope or intolerable presyncope, associated with significant arterial hypotension (decreases of 20 mmHg in systolic blood pressure).

  • Head-up Tilt Table Testing

    2014, Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside: Sixth Edition
  • Vasovagal Syncope in the Older Patient

    2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Therefore, although nitrate-provoked tilt testing is well tolerated by the elderly (70), isoprotenerol-provoked tilt testing is frequently relatively or absolutely contraindicated in older subjects (71) and has more frequent adverse effects (28,69). Alternative provocative agents studied include clomipramine, edrophonium, and isosorbide dinitrate (72–75). All the above agents have mainly been tested in younger subjects (mean age = 40.9 years), apart from edrophonium, which was tested in 2 studies involving patients up to the age of 94 years (mean age = 52 years), demonstrating equivalent positivity rates for isoprotenerol and edrophonium administration (74,75).

  • Head-up Tilt Table Testing

    2004, Cardiac Electrophysiology: Fourth Edition
  • Head-up tilt table testing

    2004, Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside
  • Comparison between isoproterenol and nitroglycerin sensitized head-upright tilt in patients with unexplained syncope and negative or positive passive head-up tilt response

    2002, American Journal of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    NTG-tilt was performed according to protocols cited in the literature and yielded a percentage of positive responses in patients with a negative response to passive tilt (35%), which is comparable to the previously reported range.8,11–13,18,19 Although the sensitivity of the ISO-tilt was dependent on the infusion rate and tilt angle, data from the literature have reported positive responses of 18% to 45% in patients with a negative response to passive tilt, as was observed in our study.10,16,20,21 NTG-tilt induced a higher number of positive responses than passive tilt, and almost all patients with a positive response to passive tilt also exhibited a positive response to NTG-tilt.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text