Stretching of the cervix and stripping of the membranes at term: a randomised controlled study

https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-2115(96)02405-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether routine antepartum stretching of the cervix and stripping of the membranes at term would shorten the length of pregnancies, and whether this correlated with cervical status and fetal and maternal parameters. Design: A prospective, randomised, controlled study of 293 term gravidas, free of medical complications, divided into two groups: stretching/stripping, and non-stretching/stripping. Digital separation of the fetal membranes from the lower uterine segment, and cervical stretching, were performed during routine vaginal examination of the first group. In the second group, only routine vaginal examination was performed. Results: Of 293 patients, 152 underwent a trial of stretching and stripping; 141 served as a control group. The mean interval (hours to delivery after the procedure) was 136 h (S.D. 10), compared to 161 h (S.D. 11) in the control group. The mean interval (hours to delivery after the procedure) was 136 h (S.D. 10), compared to 161 h (S.D. 11) in the control group (P = 0.095; not significant), but with only a trend towards the shorter interval in the first group. When patients were matched according to weeks of gestation and fetal and maternal parameters, only those at 41 weeks' gestation or more had a significant reduction in the interval from the procedure to delivery (mean 91 h (S.D. 8) compared to mean 125 h (S.D. 10) in the control group; P < 0.007). This observation was independent of cervical status and other maternal or fetal parameters. Conclusions: Only patients ≥ 41 weeks' gestation benefitted from stretching of the cervix and stripping of the fetal membranes. The effect was not dependent on the cervical status or other maternal and fetal parameters.

References (13)

  • M. Porto

    The unfavorable cervix: methods of cervical priming

    Clin Obstet Gynecol

    (1989)
  • S.M. Sellers et al.

    Release of prostaglandins after amniotomy is not mediated by oxytocin

    Br J Obstet Gynaecol

    (1980)
  • J.K.W. Ferguson

    A study of the motility of the intact uterus at term

    Surg Gynecol Obstet

    (1941)
  • J.P. Lenihan

    Relationship of antepartum pelvic examinations to premature rupture of the membranes

    Obstet Gynecol

    (1984)
  • A.P.F. Flint et al.

    Control of utero-ovarian venous prostaglandin F during labor in the sheep: acute effects of vaginal and cervical stimulation

    J Endocrinol

    (1974)
  • A. Vasicka et al.

    Plasma oxytocin in initiation of labor

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1978)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (23)

  • No. 214-Guidelines for the Management of Pregnancy at 41+0 to 42+0 Weeks

    2017, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
    Citation Excerpt :

    The results of membrane sweeping are not predictable and should not be used alone for induction if the indication for induction is urgent. In several small trials, membrane stripping has been an effective outpatient method to reduce the number of patients with pregnancies exceeding 41+0.41–44 Again, membrane sweeping is generally most efficacious in nulliparous women with unfavourable Bishop scores.

  • No. 214 - Guidelines for the management of pregnancy at 41+0 to 42+0 weeks

    2017, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
  • Amniotic membrane sweeping

    2015, Seminars in Perinatology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Logistically, in order to complete the procedure the internal cervical os must be open sufficiently to accommodate at least a single digit of the practitioner.2,5,12 If the cervix is not favorable enough to perform the procedure, some practitioners may choose to manually stretch the cervix or perform cervical massage to promote cervical ripening.14 Vaginal exam alone has been shown to increase the plasma level of prostaglandins, but not to the extent of membrane sweeping.18

  • Guidelines for the management of pregnancy at 41+0 to 42+0 weeks

    2008, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
  • Guidelines for the Management of Pregnancy at 41+0 to 42+0 Weeks

    2008, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text