Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conflict of interest in economic analyses of aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer: a systematic review

  • Review
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine whether authors conducting economic analyses of aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer are less likely to reach unfavorable conclusions if the economic study is sponsored by the manufacturer of the drug. Articles reporting the economic analyses of aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer were selected from PubMed in May 2009. Information was collected on the types of analysis, the qualitative conclusion, the quantitative results, and the funding sources. Fisher’s exact test was conducted to compare the frequency of unfavorable conclusions based on study sponsorship. Thirty-two eligible articles were identified. Twenty-six were funded by pharmaceutical companies, and 4 were funded by non-pharmaceutical companies. Two studies did not report a funding source. Twenty-one studies evaluated aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting, while 11 studies examined their use in advanced breast cancer. Twenty-two studies evaluated one type aromatase inhibitor, while 10 compared multiple types of aromatase inhibitors. Only one of the 26 (4%) pharmaceutical company-sponsored studies reported unfavorable cost-effectiveness of an aromatase inhibitor, which was a competitor’s product, whereas two of four (50%) non-pharmaceutical company-sponsored studies concluded aromatase inhibitors are not cost-effective in certain clinical scenarios (P < 0.05). Seven pharmaceutical company-sponsored studies conducted a comparison among several aromatase inhibitors; all 7 studies reported favorable conclusions for the sponsoring company’s products. The majority of economic analyses of aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer are sponsored by pharmaceuticals. Economic evaluations of aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer that are funded by a pharmaceutical company are less likely to reach unfavorable conclusions about the sponsor’s product.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nabholtz JM, Buzdar A, Pollak M et al (2000) Anastrozole is superior to tamoxifen as first line therapy for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women: results of a North American multicenter randomized trial. Arimidex Study Group. J Clin Oncol 18:3758–3767

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mouridsen H, Gershanovich M, Sun Y et al (2001) Superior efficacy of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of a phase III study of the International Letrozole Breast Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 19:2596–2606

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaufmann M, Bajetta E, Dirix LY et al (2000) Exemestane is superior to megestrol acetate after tamoxifen failure in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of a phase III randomized double blind trial. The Exemestane Study Group. J Clin Oncol 18:1399–1411

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Budzar AU, Jones SE, Vogel CL et al (1997) A phase III trial comparing anastrozole (1 and 10 milligrams), a potent and selective aromatase inhibitor, with MA in postmenopausal women with advanced breast carcinoma. Cancer 79:730–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dombernowsky P, Smith I, Falkson G et al (1998) Letrozole, a new aromatase inhibitor for advanced breast cancer: double blind randomized trial showing a dose effect and improved efficacy and tolerability compared with megestrol acetate. J Clin Oncol 16:453–461

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baum M, Buzdar A, Cuzick J et al (2003) Anastrozole alone or in combination with tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer: results of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination) trial efficacy and safety update analyses. Cancer 98:1802–1810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Th¨urlimann B, Keshaviah A, Coates AS et al (2005) A comparison of letrozole and tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:2747–2757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Coombes RC, Hall E, Gibson LJ et al (2004) A randomized trial of exemestane after two to three years of tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer. N Engl J Med 350:1081–1092

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goss PE, Ingle JN, Martino S et al (2007) Efficacy of letrozole extended adjuvant therapy according to estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status of the primary tumor. J Clin Oncol 25:2006–2011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eisen A, Trudeau M, Shelly W et al. (2009) The role of aromatase inhibitors in adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: guideline recommendations. Cancer Care Ont. http://www.cancercare.on.ca/pdf/pebc1-18f.pdf. Accessed 13 Oct 2009

  11. Annemans L (2008) Methodological issues in evaluating cost effectiveness of adjuvant aromatase inhibitors in early breast cancer: a need for improved modeling to aid decision making. Pharmacoeconomics 26:409–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Clement FM, Harris A, Li JJ et al (2009) Using effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to make drug coverage decisions: a comparison of Britain, Australia, and Canada. JAMA 302:1437–1443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Friedberg M, Saffran B, Stinson TJ et al (1999) Evaluation of conflict of interest in economic analyses of new drugs used in oncology. JAMA 282:1453–1457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Krimsky S (1999) Conflict of interest and cost-effectiveness analysis. JAMA 282:1474–1475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas RK, Williams M, Glen J et al (2009) Comparing the cost of adjuvant anastrozole with the benefits of managing less patients with relapsed breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 117(2):289–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Locker GY, Mansel R, Cella D et al (2007) Cost-effectiveness analysis of anastrozole versus tamoxifen as primary adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: a US healthcare system perspective. The 5-year completed treatment analysis of the ATAC (‘Arimidex’, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination) trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 106(2):229–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mansel R, Locker G, Fallowfield L et al (2007) Cost-effectiveness analysis of anastrozole vs tamoxifen in adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer in the United Kingdom: the 5-year completed treatment analysis of the ATAC (‘Arimidex’, Tamoxifen alone or in combination) trial. Br J Cancer 97:152–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rocchi A, Verma S (2006) Anastrozole is cost-effective vs tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer: Canadian perspectives on the ATAC completed-treatment analysis. Support Care Cancer 14:917–927

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lundkvist J, Wilking N, Holmberg S et al (2007) Cost-effectiveness of exemestane versus tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer after 2–3 years treatment with tamoxifen in Sweden. Breast Cancer Res Treat 102:289–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Risebrough NA, Verma S, Trudeau M et al (2007) Cost-effectiveness of switching to exemestane versus continued tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer. Cancer 110:499–508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Thompson D, Taylor DC, Montoya EL et al (2007) Cost-effectiveness of switching to exemestane after 2 to 3 years of therapy with tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. Value Health 10:367–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Delea TE, El-Ouagari K, Karnon J et al (2008) Cost-effectiveness of letrozole versus tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive early breast cancer from a Canadian perspective. Breast Cancer Res Treat 108:375–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Delea TE, Karnon J, Sofrygin O et al (2007) Cost-effectiveness of letrozole versus tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy in hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 7:608–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. El Ouagari K, Karnon J, Delea T et al (2007) Cost-effectiveness of letrozole in the extended adjuvant treatment of women with early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 101:37–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Karnon J, Delea T, Johnston SR et al (2006) Cost effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole in postmenopausal women after adjuvant tamoxifen therapy: the UK perspective. Pharmacoeconomics 24:237–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Delea TE, Karnon J, Smith RE et al (2006) Cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole therapy after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. Am J Manag Care 12:374–386

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Karnon J, Delea T, Barghout V (2008) Cost utility analysis of early adjuvant letrozole or anastrozole versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with early invasive breast cancer: the UK perspective. Eur J Health Econ 9:171–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Skedgel C, Rayson D, Dewar R et al (2007) Cost-utility of adjuvant hormone therapies with aromatase inhibitors in post-menopausal women with breast cancer: upfront anastrozole, sequential tamoxifen-exemestane and extended tamoxifen-letrozole. Breast 16:252–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gil JM, Rubio-Terrés C, Del Castillo A et al (2006) Pharmacoeconomic analysis of adjuvant therapy with exemestane, anastrozole, letrozole or tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with operable and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 8:339–348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Simons WR, Jones D, Buzdar A (2003) Cost-effectiveness of anastrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Clin Ther 25:2972–2987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lindgren P, Jönsson B, Redaelli A et al (2002) Cost-effectiveness analysis of exemestane compared with megestrol in advanced breast cancer: a model for Europe and Australia. Pharmacoeconomics 20:101–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hillner BE, Radice D (2001) Cost-effectiveness analysis of exemestane compared with megestrol in patients with advanced breast carcinoma. Cancer 91:484–489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Karnon J, Jones T (2003) A stochastic economic evaluation of letrozole versus tamoxifen as a first-line hormonal therapy: for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal patients. Pharmacoeconomics 21:513–525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Karnon J, Johnston SR, Jones T et al (2003) A trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis of letrozole followed by tamoxifen versus tamoxifen followed by letrozole for postmenopausal advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol 14:1629–1633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nuijten M, McCormick J, Waibel F et al (2000) Economic evaluation of letrozole in the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women in Canada. Value Health 3:31–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nuijten M, Meester L, Waibel F et al (1999) Cost effectiveness of letrozole in the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women in the UK. Pharmacoeconomics 16:379–397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Marchetti M, Caruggi M, Colombo G (2004) Cost utility and budget impact of third-generation aromatase inhibitors for advanced breast cancer: a literature-based model analysis of costs in the Italian National Health Service. Clin Ther 26:1546–1561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Verma S, Rocchi A (2003) Economic evaluation of antiaromatase agents in the second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 11:728–734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dranitsaris G, Verma S, Trudeau M (2003) Cost utility analysis of first-line hormonal therapy in advanced breast cancer: comparison of two aromatase inhibitors to tamoxifen. Am J Clin Oncol 26:289–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Dranitsaris G, Leung P, Mather J et al (2000) Cost-utility analysis of second-line hormonal therapy in advanced breast cancer: a comparison of two aromatase inhibitors to megestrol acetate. Anticancer Drugs 11:591–601

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hillner BE (2004) Benefit and projected cost-effectiveness of anastrozole versus tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy for patients with early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancer 101:1311–1322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Skedgel C, Rayson D, Dewar R et al (2007) Cost-utility of adjuvant hormone therapies for breast cancer in post-menopausal women: sequential tamoxifen-exemestane and upfront anastrozole. Breast Cancer Res Treat 101:325–333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Younis T, Rayson D, Dewar R et al (2007) Modeling for cost-effective-adjuvant aromatase inhibitor strategies for postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol 18:293–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lønning PE (2006) Comparing cost/utility of giving an aromatase inhibitor as monotherapy for 5 years versus sequential administration following 2–3 or 5 years of tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal breast cancer. Ann Oncol 17:217–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Piskur P, Sonc M, Cufer T et al (2006) Pharmacoeconomic aspects of adjuvant anastrozole or tamoxifen in breast cancer: a Slovenian perspective. Anticancer Drugs 17:719–724

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Moeremans K, Annemans L (2006) Cost-effectiveness of anastrozole compared to tamoxifen in hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. Analysis based on the ATAC trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer 16:576–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Michael J. Franklin, MS of the University of Minnesota for editing the manuscript.

Funding source

None.

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Navneet S. Majhail.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jang, S., Chae, Y.K., Haddad, T. et al. Conflict of interest in economic analyses of aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 121, 273–279 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-0870-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-0870-7

Keywords

Navigation