Skip to main content
Log in

Prevention of stroke recurrence with presumed paradoxical embolism

  • ENS review
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Paradoxical cerebral embolism (PCE) through a patent foramen ovale (PFO) should be considered as a cause of ischemic stroke, particularly in young patients without an altenative cause for stroke. PCE is even more important that it is potentially treatable. However, PCE remains often presumed because it rests upon the rarely demonstrated findings of a deep venous thrombosis and a thrombus lodged in the PFO. Recent studies have shown a rather low stroke recurrence rate in patients with PFO and stroke but suggest that some subgroups of patients with a higher stroke recurrence risk exist according clinical, echocardiographical and radiological characteristics. For these subgroups, it seems that a more invasive treatment should be required. There are four therapeutic options; antiaggregants, anticoagulation, transcatheter closure of PFO, and surgical closure of PFO. However, these treatments have yet to be evaluated in clinical trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 12 September 1996 Accepted: 1 October 1996

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bogousslavsky, J., Devuyst, G., Nendaz, M. et al. Prevention of stroke recurrence with presumed paradoxical embolism. J Neurol 244, 71–75 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004150050052

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004150050052

Navigation