Skip to main content
Log in

Bone mineral density reference ranges for Australian men: Geelong Osteoporosis Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

A large population-based random sample of Australian white men was used to provide normative bone mineral density (BMD) data at multiple anatomical sites. The femoral neck BMD data are very similar to those obtained in USA non-Hispanic white males participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES III). The reference ranges will be suitable for similar populations.

Introduction

To provide normative BMD data for Australian men derived from a large population-based random sample.

Methods

An age-stratified random sample of men was recruited from the Australian electoral rolls (n = 1,467 aged 20–97 years). BMD was quantified at multiple sites using Lunar densitometers.

Results

Age-related differences in BMD were best predicted by linear relationships at the spine and hip and by quadratic functions at the whole body and forearm. At the spine, a small age-related increase in mean BMD was observed. Although in the subset with no spinal abnormalities, there was a decrease of 0.003 g/cm2 per year from age 20. At the hip sites, mean BMD decreased at 0.001–0.006 g/cm2 per year from age 20. At the forearm and whole body, BMD peaked at 41–47 years. Apart from a small difference in men greater than or equal to 80 years, the Australian femoral neck BMD data are not different to those obtained in USA non-Hispanic white males participating in NHANES III and were generally similar to those of large studies from Canada (CaMos) and Spain.

Conclusions

These data supply BMD reference ranges at multiple anatomical sites that will be applicable to white Australian men and similar populations such as USA non-Hispanic white men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Henry MJ, Pasco JA, Seeman E, Nicholson GC, Sanders KM, Kotowicz MA (2001) Assessment of fracture risk: value of random population-based samples—the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. J Clin Densitometry 4:283–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Flicker L, Green RM, Kaymakci B, Lichtenstein M, Buirski G, Wark JD (1995) Do Australian women have greater spinal bone density than North American women? Osteoporosis Int 5:63–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Duppe H, Gardsell P, Johnell O, Nilsson B (1992) Bone mineral content in women: trends of change. Osteoporos Int 2:262–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Calvo MS, Harris TB, Heyse SP, Johnston CC Jr, Lindsay R (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tenenhouse A, Joseph L, Kreiger N, Poliquin S, Murray TM, Blondeau L, Berger C, Hanley DA, Prior JC (2000) Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporos Int 11:897–904

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Szulc P, Marchand F, Duboeuf F, Delmas PD (2000) Cross-sectional assessment of age-related bone loss in men: the MINOS study. Bone 26:123–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Diaz Curiel M, Carrasco de la Pena J, Honorato Perez J, Perez Cano R, Rapado A, Ruiz Martinez I (1997) Study of bone mineral density in lumbar spine and femoral neck in a Spanish population. Osteoporosis Int 7:59–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Larijani B, Moayyeri A, Keshtkar AA, Hossein-Nezhad A, Soltani A, Bahrami A, Omrani GH, Rajabian R, Nabipour I (2006) Peak bone mass of Iranian population: the Iranian Multicenter Osteoporosis Study. J Clin Densitom 9:367–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaptoge S, da Silva JA, Brixen K, Reid DM, Kroger H, Nielsen TL, Andersen M, Hagen C, Lorenc R, Boonen S, de Vernejoul MC, Stepan JJ, Adams J, Kaufman JM, Reeve J (2008) Geographical variation in DXA bone mineral density in young European men and women. Results from the Network in Europe on Male Osteoporosis (NEMO) study. Bone 43:332–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lu Y, Fuerst T, Hui S, Genant H (2001) Standardization of bone mineral density at femoral neck, trochanter and Ward’s triangle. Osteoporos Int 12:438–444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Genant H, Grampp S, Gluer C, Faulkner K, Jergas M, Engelke K, Hagiwara S, Van Kuijk C (1994) Universal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results. J Bone Miner Res 9:1503–1514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cauley JA, Fullman RL, Stone KL, Zmuda JM, Bauer DC, Barrett-Connor E, Ensrud K, Lau EM, Orwoll ES (2005) Factors associated with the lumbar spine and proximal femur bone mineral density in older men. Osteoporos Int 16:1525–1537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. El Maghraoui A, Ghazi M, Gassim S, Mounach A, Ghozlani I, Nouijai A, Achemlal L, Bezza A, Dehhaoui M (2009) Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in a group of healthy Moroccan men. Bone 44:965–969

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kanis JA (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int 4:368–381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu G, Peacock M, Eilam O, Dorulla G, Braunstein E, Johnston CC (1997) Effect of osteoarthritis in the lumbar spine and hip on bone mineral density and diagnosis of osteoporosis in elderly men and women. Osteoporos Int 7:564–569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kalichman L, Li L, Kim DH, Guermazi A, Berkin V, O’Donnell CJ, Hoffmann U, Cole R, Hunter DJ (2008) Facet joint osteoarthritis and low back pain in the community-based population. Spine 33:2560–2565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Madan SS, Rai A, Harley JM (2003) Interobserver error in interpretation of the radiographs for degeneration of the lumbar spine. Iowa Orthop J 23:51–56

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schneider DL, Bettencourt R, Barrett-Connor E (2006) Clinical utility of spine bone density in elderly women. J Clin Densitom 9:255–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stewart A, Black AJ (2000) Bone mineral density in osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 12:464–467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Henry MJ, Pasco JA, Nicholson GC, Seeman E, Kotowicz MA (2000) Prevalence of osteoporosis in Australian women: Geelong Osteoporosis Study. J Clin Densitom 3:261–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kudlacek S, Schneider B, Peterlik M, Leb G, Klaushofer K, Weber K, Woloszczuk W, Willvonseder R (2003) Normative data of bone mineral density in an unselected adult Austrian population. Eur J Clin Invest 33:332–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McMahon K, Kalnins S, Freund J, Pocock N (2003) Discordance in lumbar spine T-scores and nonstandardization of standard deviations. J Clin Densitom 6:1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge funding support from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, the National Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Conditions Improvement Grants Program and Geelong Region Medical Research Foundation, Ronald Geoffrey Arnott Foundation and The University of Melbourne.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. C. Nicholson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henry, M.J., Pasco, J.A., Korn, S. et al. Bone mineral density reference ranges for Australian men: Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 21, 909–917 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-1042-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-1042-7

Keywords

Navigation