Skip to main content
Log in

Use of clinical risk factors to identify postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Previous studies have been unable to identify risk factors for prevalent vertebral fractures (VF), which are suitable for use in selection strategies intended to target high-risk sub-groups for diagnostic assessment. However, these studies generally consisted of large epidemiology surveys based on questionnaires and were only able to evaluate a limited number of risk factors. Here, we investigated whether a stronger relationship exists with prevalent VF when conventional risk factors are combined with additional information obtained from detailed one-to-one assessment.

Methods

Women aged 65–75 registered at four geographically distinct GP practices were invited to participate (n=1,518), of whom 540 attended for assessment as follows: a questionnaire asking about risk factors for osteoporosis such as height loss compared to age 25 and history of non-vertebral fracture (NVF), the get-up-and-go test, Margolis back pain score, measurement of wall-tragus and rib-pelvis distances, and BMD as measured by the distal forearm BMD. A lateral thoraco-lumbar spine X-ray was obtained, which was subsequently scored for the presence of significant vertebral deformities.

Results

Of the 509 subjects who underwent spinal radiographs, 37 (7.3%) were found to have one or more VF. Following logistic regression analysis, the four most predictive clinical risk factors for prevalent VF were: height loss (P=0.006), past NVF (P=0.004), history of back pain (P=0.075) and age (P=0.05). BMD was also significantly associated with prevalent VF (P=0.002), but its inclusion did not affect associations with other variables. Factors elicited from detailed one-to-one assessment were not related to the risk of one or more prevalent VFs. The area under ROC curves derived from these regressions, which suggested that models for prevalent VF had modest predictive accuracy, were as follows: 0.68 (BMD), 0.74 (four clinical risk factors above) and 0.78 (clinical risk factors + BMD). Analyses were repeated in relation to the subgroup of 13 patients with two or more VFs, which revealed that in this instance, the Margolis back pain score and rib-pelvis distance were associated with the presence of multiple VFs (P=0.022 and 0.026, respectively). Moreover, the predictive value as reflected by the ROC curve area was improved: 0.80 (BMD), 0.88 (the four most predictive clinical risk factors consisting of the height loss, past NVF, Margolis back pain score and rib-pelvis distance) and 0.91 (clinical risk factors + BMD).

Conclusions

Evaluation of additional risk factors from detailed one-to-one assessment does not improve the predictive value of risk factors for one or more prevalent vertebral deformities in postmenopausal women. However, the use of factors such as the Margolis back pain score and rib-pelvis distance may be helpful in identifying postmenopausal women at high risk of multiple prevalent VFs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O’Neill TW, Felsenberg D, Varlow J, Cooper C, Kanis JA, Silman AJ (1996) The prevalence of vertebral deformity in European men and women: The European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 11:1010–1017

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ettinger B, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Rundle AC, Cauley JA, Cummings SR, Genant HK (1992) Contribution of vertebral deformities to chronic back pain and disability. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 7(4):449–456

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Compston J, Eastell R, Francis R, McCloskey E, Reid D, Tobias JH, Barlow D, Cooper C, Kanis J, Whitehead M (2000) Osteoporosis: clinical guidelines for prevention and treatment. Royal College of Physicians of London

  4. Ross PD (1997) Clincal consequences of vertebral fractures. Am J Med 103:S30–S43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper C, Shah S, Hand DJ, Adams J, Compston J, Davie M, Woolf A (1991) Screening for vertebral osteoporosis using individual risk factors. The multicentre Vertebral Fracture Study Group. Osteoporos Int 2:48–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ling X, Cummings SR, Mingwei Q, Xihe Z, Xioashu C, Nevitt M, Stone K (2000) Vertebral fractures in Beijing, China: the Beijing Osteoporosis Project. J Bone Miner Res 15(10):2019–2025

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Der Klift M, De Laet CEDH, McCloskey EV, Hofman A, Pols HAP (2002) The incidence of vertebral fractures in men and women: The Rotterdam Study. J Bone Miner Res 17:1051–1056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ismail AA, Cooper C, Felsenberg D, Varlow J, Kanis JA, Silman A, O’Neill TW (1999) Number and type of vertebral deformity: epidemiological characterisation and relation to low back pain and height loss. Osteoporos Int 9:206–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cummings SR, Melton LJ III (2002) Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 359:1761–1767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Siminoski K, Warshawski RS, Jen H, Lee K-C (2003) Accuracy of physical examination using the rib-pelvis distance for detection of lumbar vertebral fractures. Am J Med 115:233–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Neill TW, Cooper C, Algra D (1995) Design and development of a questionnaire for use in EVOS. Rheumatol Europe 24:75–81

    Google Scholar 

  12. Margolis RB, Tait RC, Krause SJ (1986) Pain 24:57–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang G, Eastell R, Barrington NA, Ferrar L (2004) Comparison of methods for the visual identification of prevalent vertebral fractures in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 15:887–896

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB (1996) Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 15(4):361–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaptoge S, Armbrecht G, Felsenberg D, Lunt M, O’Neill TW, Silman AJ, Reeve J, Group ES (2004) When should the doctor order a spine X-ray? Identifying vertebral fractures for osteoporosis care: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). J Bone Miner Res 19:1982–1993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schousboe JT, Debold CR (2006) Reliability and accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment with densitometry compared to radiography in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 17:281–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Decode study group (1999) Is fasting glucose sufficient to define diabetes? Epidemiological data from 20 European studies. The DECODE-study group. European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Diabetes Epidemiology: collaborative analysis of Diagnostic Criteria in Europe. Diabetologia 42:647–654

    Google Scholar 

  18. Watts NB, Josse RG, Hamdy RC 2003 Risedronate prevents new vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women at high risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:542–549

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Patel R, Blake GM, Fogelman I (2004) An evaluation of the United Kingdom National Osteoporosis Society position statement on the use of peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int 15:497–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We are grateful to Valda Field for her role in obtaining a research grant for this study from Procter and Gamble to cover running expenses, including salary costs for Alison Hutchinson.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. H. Tobias.

Additional information

This project was funded by Procter and Gamble UK.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tobias, J.H., Hutchinson, A.P., Hunt, L.P. et al. Use of clinical risk factors to identify postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 18, 35–43 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0209-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0209-8

Keywords

Navigation