Abstract
This paper strongly rejects the notion that the use of biomedical terms to represent traditional Chinese medical concepts is helpful to the internationalization of Chinese medicine. It further argues that this practice destroys the integrity and independence of Chinese medical concepts. Taking the term fēng hu< o y < an as an example, it shows that the biomedical term “acute conjunctivitis” often suggested as the translation for this term is unsatisfactory, because (1) the clinical reference is not identical, (2) it introduces the concepts of “conjunctiva” and “inflammation”, which are not Chinese medical concepts, and (3) destroys the Chinese medical concepts “wind” and “fire” expressed in the Chinese, which reflect the way the disease is traditionally diagnosed and treated. While for English readers not familiar with Chinese medicine, “acute conjunctivitis” may be immediately intelligible, for those seeking a deep understanding of the subject, the literal translation (loan translation) “wind-fire eye” is much more helpful. This paper supports these arguments with numerous other examples.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Xie ZF, White P. Comments on Nigel Wiseman’sA Practical Dictionary of Chinese Medicine (I)—On the “Word-for-word” Literal Approach to Translation. Chin J Integr Med 2005;12(4): 305–308.
Xlie ZF, White P. Comments on Nigel Wiseman’ sA Practical Dictionary of Chinese Medicine (II)—On the use Western Medicine Terms to Express the Concepts of Tratiditionla Chinese Medicine. Chin J Integr Med 2006;13 (1): 61–65.
Xie ZF. English translation of common terms in traditional Chinese medicine. Beijing: China Press of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2004.
Cooper RA. Health care workforce for the twenty-first century: The impact of nonphysician clinicians. Annual Review Med 2001;52: 51–61.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wiseman, N. Concerning the use of Western medical terms to represent traditional Chinese medical concepts —Answer to Prof. Xie and his colleagues. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 12, 225–228 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02836530
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02836530