Abstract
As part of a qualitative research study of the experience of work-related back problems, a series of in-depth ethnographic interviews were conducted with 15 workers receiving treatment for back injuries. Analysis of these data revealed that the workers perceived their back problems as lifelong problems. Many believed that their back injuries had permanently heightened their vulnerability to reinjury and chronic disability. Accommodating this sense of physical vulnerability required a redefinition of one's self and one's future. For some workers, the perceived threat of future back problems was itself disabling and appeared to discourage a return to normal social roles. Workers' interactions with the health care system shaped their perceptions of their bodies and their notions of the appropriate means to cope with their physical vulnerability. Implications of the perception of permanence for the development of chronic disability among workers who experience back problems are examined.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Deyo RA, Cherkin D, Conrad D, Volinn E. Cost, controversy, crisis: Low back pain and the health of the public.Annu Rev Publ Health 1991; 12: 141–156.
Nachemson, AL. Newest knowledge of low back pain: A critical look.Clin Orthop Rel Res 1992; 279: 8–20.
Feuerstein M. A multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, evaluation, and management of work disability.J Occup Rehab 1991; 1(1): 5–12.
Spitzer WO, LeBlanc FE, Dupuis M, Abenhaim L, Belanger AY, Bloch R, Bombardier C, Cruess RL, Drouin G, Duval-Hesler N, Laflamme J, Lamoureux G, Nachemson AL, Page JJ, Rossignol M, Salmi LR, Salois-Arsenault S, Suissa S, Wood-Dauphinee S. Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders: A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders.Spine 1987; 12(7S): s4-s55.
Frymoyer JW, Cats-Baril WL. An overview of the incidences and costs of low back pain.Orthop Clin North Am 1991; 22(2): 263–271.
Biering-Sorensen F. A prospective study of low back pain in a general population. II Location, character, aggravating and relieving factors.Scand J Rehab Med 1983; 15(2): 81–88.
Riihimäki H, Wickstrom G, Hanninen K, Luopajarvi, T. Predictors of sciatic pain among concrete reinforcement workers and house painters—a five year follow-up.Scand J Work Environ Health 1989; 15: 415–423.
Deyo RA, Diehl AK. Psychosocial predictors of disability in patients with low back pain.J Rheumatol 1988; 15(10): 1557–1564.
Goertz MN. Prognostic indicators for acute low-back pain.Spine 1990; 15(12): 1307–1310.
Frymoyer JW. Predicting disability from low back pain.Clin Orthop Rel Res 1992; 279: 101–109.
Gilbert JR, Taylor DW, Hildebrand A, Evans C. Clinical trial of common treatments for low back pain in family practice.Br Med J 1985; 291(6498): 791–794.
Faas A, Chavannes AW, Van Eijk JTM, Gubbels JW. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of exercise therapy in patients with acute low back pain.Spine 1993; 18(11): 1388–1395.
Tarasuk V, Eakin JM.Social dimensions of the experience of work-related back problems OWCI working paper #6. Toronto: Ontario Workers' Compensation Institute, 1993.
Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine Press, 1967.
Spencer JC. The usefulness of qualitative methods in rehabilitation: Issues of meaning, of context, and of change.Arch Phys Med Rehab 1993; 74: 119–126.
Holman HR. Qualitative inquiry in medical research.J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46(1): 29–36.
Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry.Educ Comm Tech J 1982; 30(4): 233–252.
Steckler A, McLeroy KR, Goodman RM, Bird ST, McCromick L. Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: An introduction.Health Educ Q 1992; 19(1): 1–8.
Bryman A. The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: A question of method or epistemology?Brit J Sociol 1984; 35(1): 75–92.
Mitchell RI, Carmen GM. Results of a multicenter trial using an intensive active exercise program for the treatment of acute soft tissue and back injuries.Spine 1990; 15(6): 514–521.
Inui TS, Frankel RM. Evaluating the quality of qualitative research: A proposal pro tem.J Gen Intern Med 1991; 6(5): 485–486.
LeCompte MD, Goetz JP. Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research.Rev Educ Res 1982; 52(1): 31–60.
Athens L. Scientific criteria for evaluating qualitative studies.Stud Symbol Interact 1984; 5: 259–268.
Guba E, Lincoln Y.Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage, 1989.
Kuzel A, Like R. Standards of trustworthiness in qualitative studies in primary care. In: Norton P, ed.Primary care research: Traditional and innovative approaches. Newbury Park: Sage, 1991.
World Health Organization.International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps—a manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1980.
Bury M. Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociol Health Illness 1982; 4(2): 167–182.
Garro LC. Chronic illness and the construction of narratives. In: Delvecchio Good M-J, Brodwin PE, Good BJ, Kleinman A, ed.Pain as human experience: An anthropological perspective. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1992, pp. 100–137.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tarasuk, V., Eakin, J.M. Back problems are for life: Perceived vulnerability and its implications for chronic disability. J Occup Rehab 4, 55–64 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02109996
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02109996