Table 1:

Characteristics of prospective cohort studies investigating the dietary intake of total sugars, fructose and sucrose and incident type 2 diabetes

Study, yearCohortCountryNo. of participantsNo. of incident casesAge, yrDuration of study, yrDietary intake assessment (at baseline)Sugars exposure, g/dMethod of outcome assessmentFunding source
Colditz et al., 1992 (24)Nurses Health StudyUnited States84 360 (F)70234–596Validated SFFQSucrose exposure unknownSelf-reportAgency
Meyer et al., 2000 (25)Iowa Women’s Health StudyUnited States35 988 (F)114155–696Validated FFQSucrose 25.8–57.7, fructose 12.5–35.5Self-reportAgency
Janket et al., 2003 (26)Women’s Health StudyUnited States38 480 (F)91846–616Validated SFFQSucrose 25.8–57.2, fructose 25.8–57.2, total sugars 25.8–57.2Self-reportAgency
Hodge et al., 2004 (27)Melbourne Collaborative Cohort StudyAustralia31 64136527–754FFQTotal sugars 63.6–194.4Physician diagnosisAgency
Barclay et al., 2007 (28)Blue Mountains Eye StudyAustralia1833138≥ 4910Validated SFFQTotal sugars 100Self-reportNA
Montonen et al., 2007 (29)Finnish Mobile Health Clinic Examination SurveyFinland428417540–6912Interview with questionnaireSucrose 28.5–79.5, fructose 6.0–28.8, total sugars 92.0–171Medical record linkageNA
Schulze et al., 2008 (30)EPIC- PotsdamGermany9702 (M), 15 365 (F)491 (M), 355 (F)35–657–11Validated SFFQSucrose 22.5–102 (M), 28.2–83.4 (F); fructose 8.4–40.6 (M), 11–34.8 (F)Physician diagnosisAgency
Sluijs et al., 2013 (31)EPIC-InterAct StudyThe Netherlands229082820–7012Quantitative Dietary QuestionnaireTotal sugars 65–137Medical record linkageAgency
Sluijs et al., 2013 (31)EPIC-InterAct StudyDenmark4037205550–6412Validated SFFQTotal sugars 65–137Medical record linkageAgency
Sluijs et al., 2013 (31)EPIC-InterAct StudyFrance867 (F)28840–6512Quantitative Dietary QuestionnaireTotal sugars 65–137Medical record linkageAgency
Sluijs et al., 2013 (31)EPIC-InterAct StudyGermany3578158440–65 (M), 35–65 (F)12Quantitative Dietary QuestionnaireTotal sugars 65–137Medical record linkageAgency
Sluijs et al., 2013 (31)EPIC-InterAct StudyItaly3393143735–7412Quantitative Dietary Questionnaire; Naples, Validated SFFQ; Ragusa, Dietary InterviewTotal sugars 65–137Medical record linkageAgency
Sluijs et al., 2013 (31)EPIC-InterAct StudySpain5889256440–65 (M), 35–65 (F)12Quantitative Dietary Questionnaire, Dietary InterviewTotal sugars 65–137Medical record linkageAgency
Sluijs et al., 2013 (31)EPIC-InterAct StudySweden5401262230–7212Validated SFFQ, 14-d recordTotal sugars 65–137Medical record linkageAgency
Ahmadi- Abhari et al., 2014 (32)EPIC-Norfolk StudyEngland415375340–796.3Validated SFFQ, 7-d food diarySucrose 25–76.5, fructose 8–32, total sugars 71.5–149.5Medical record linkageAgency
  • Note: F = females, FFQ = Food-Frequency Questionnaire, HR = hazard ratio, IQR = interquartile range, M = males, NA = not available, SD = standard deviation, SFFQ = Semiquantitative Food-Frequency Questionnaire.

  • * Durations reported as mean ± SD, median (IQR) or as a range.

  • Sugars exposure reported as median (IQR) or as a range.

  • Agency funding is that from government, university or not-for-profit health agency sources.