Table 4:

Health events with various strategies*

Screening strategyHealth event; no. per 10 000 screenedHCV-related deaths prevented v. “no screening”
Decompensated cirrhosisHepatocellular carcinomaHCV-related liver death
Age 25–64 yr
No screening241535
Screen and treat with PEG IFN+RBV1812269
Screen and treat with simeprevir+PEG IFN+RBV (G1), SOF+RBV (G2/3) or PEG IFN+RBV (G4/5/6)1471818
Screen and treat with interferon-free DAA (G1), SOF+RBV (G2/3) or PEG IFN+RBV (G4/5/6)1371818
Age 45–64 yr
No screening292044
Screen and treat with PEG IFN+RBV2317359
Screen and treat with simeprevir+PEG IFN+RBV (G1), SOF+RBV (G2/3) or PEG IFN+RBV (G4/5/6)2082420
Screen and treat with interferon-free DAA (G1), SOF+RBV (G2/3) or PEG IFN+RBV (G4/5/6)1882321
  • Note: DAA = direct-acting antiviral agent; G1 = genotype 1; G2/3: = genotype 2 or 3; G4/5/6 = genotype 4, 5 or 6; HCV = hepatitis virus C; PEG IFN+RBV = pegylated interferon plus ribavirin; SOF+RBV = sofosbuvir plus ribavirin.

  • * According to the simulation, for every 10 000 people screened, about 63 cases of HCV would be identified. Of these cases, 37 (59%) would be eligible for treatment. Identifying these 37 cases by screening and treating them would prevent, over the lifetime of the cohort, 6 cases of decompensated cirrhosis, 3 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma and 9 HCV-related deaths if PEG IFN+RBV were used for treatment (relative to no screening) or 11 cases of decompensated cirrhosis, 8 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma and18 HCV-related deaths if DAAs were used for treatment (relative to no screening).

  • Values reported in the table have been rounded to whole numbers.