Table 3:

Results of magnetic resonance imaging and gadoliniun-enhanced venography

MR resultNo. (%) of participantsp value
Patients
n = 110
Controls
n = 56
MR imaging
No. of white matter lesions
 05 (5)29 (52)< 0.001
 1–1034 (31)22 (39)
 11–2033 (30)5 (9)
 21–3038 (35)0 (0)
Enhancing lesions12 (11)0 (0)0.2
Parenchymal atrophy29 (26)0 (0)< 0.001
Corpus callosum atrophy25 (23)0 (0)< 0.001
MR venography (TRICKS)*RightLeftRightLeftRight/Left
IJV dominance29 (26)12 (11)12 (21)3 (5)0.3/0.3
IJV flattening C1–C3 level, %n = 109n = 109
 0–2432 (29)32 (29)14 (25)17 (30)0.9/0.7
 25–4944 (40)42 (39)23 (41)17 (30)
 50–7410 (9)11 (10)5 (9)6 (11)
 75–10023 (21)24 (22)14 (25)16 (29)
IJV flattening C4–C5 level, %
 0–2494 (86)87 (80)51 (91)46 (82)0.9/0.8
 25–495 (5)9 (8)1 (2)5 (9)
 50–743 (3)1 (1)1 (2)1 (2)
 75–1007 (6)12 (11)3 (5)4 (7)
IJV flattening C6–T1 level, %
 0–2455 (50)87 (80)29 (52)46 (82)0.9/0.9
 25–4921 (19)9 (8)11 (20)5 (9)
 50–748 (7)1 (1)2 (4)1 (2)
 75–10025 (23)12 (11)14 (25)4 (7)
Collateral vein score
 Normal25 (23)25 (23)12 (21)13 (23)> 0.9/0.8
 Mild45 (41)39 (36)25 (45)23 (41)
 Moderate29 (27)37 (34)14 (25)15 (27)
 Prominent10 (9)8 (7)5 (9)5 (9)
Intracranial venous stenosis0 (0)0 (0)NA
Transverse sinus dominance23 (21)12 (11)13 (23)4 (7)0.4/0.8
MR pre/post Gd RAGE
IJV narrowing at C1–C3 level, %
 0–2435 (32)38 (35)14 (25)17 (30)0.8/0.4
 25–4944 (40)43 (39)25 (45)18 (32)
 50–749 (8)11 (10)4 (7)6 (11)
 75–10021 (19)17 (16)13 (23)15 (27)
IJV narrowing at C4–C6 level, %
 0–24103 (94)98 (90)55 (98)49 (88)0.8/0.9
 25–495 (5)7 (6)1 (2)5 (9)
 50–741 (1)1 (1)0 (0)0 (0)
 75–1000 (0)3 (3)0 (0)2 (4)
IJV narrowing at C7–T1 level, %
 0–2461 (56)69 (63)31 (55)32 (57)0.7/0.7
 25–4921 (19)11 (10)10 (18)8 (14)
 50–748 (7)8 (7)2 (4)3 (5)
 75–10019 (17)21 (19)13 (23)13 (23)
Mass or lymph nodes0 (0)0 (0)NA
  • Note: Gd = gadolinium, IJV = internal jugular vein, MR = magnetic resonance, NA = not applicable, RAGE = rapid gradient echo, TRICKS = time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics.

  • * For one patient, some MR venography sequences were unreadable, so data were available for only 109 patients.

  • Narrowing commonly by extrinsic compression from the transverse vertebral process.