Table 3:

Relative abundance of dominant phyla, families and genera in fecal samples, by mode of delivery and infant diet*

TaxonRelative abundance, %, mean ± SEp valueRelative abundance, %, mean ± SEp value
Vaginal delivery n = 18Cesarean delivery n = 6Not breastfed n = 9Breastfed n = 15
Actinobacteria
Bifidobacteriaceae36.6 ± 7.848.6 ± 14.8> 0.134.4 ± 9.842.8 ± 9.4> 0.1
Bifidobacterium36.6 ± 7.848.6 ± 14.8> 0.134.4 ± 9.842.8 ± 9.4> 0.1
Coriobacteriaceae1.8 ± 0.90.3 ± 0.1> 0.11.6 ± 1.01.3 ± 0.9> 0.1
Eggerthella0.5 ± 0.30.3 ± 0.2> 0.10.6 ± 0.40.4 ± 0.2> 0.1
Bacteroidetes
Bacteroidaceae1.0 ± 0.40.0 ± 0.00.030.7 ± 0.40.8 ± 0.4> 0.1
Bacteroides1.0 ± 0.40.0 ± 0.00.02§0.7 ± 0.40.8 ± 0.4> 0.1
Proteobacteria
Enterobacteriaceae13.7 ± 2.76.2 ± 3.1> 0.19.5 ± 2.613.2 ± 3.3> 0.1
Escherichia–Shigella13.6 ± 2.71.0 ± 0.7< 0.001§8.3 ± 2.911.8 ± 3.4> 0.1
Pasteurellaceae0.1 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.6> 0.10.0 ± 0.00.4 ± 0.30.04
Haemophilus0.1 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.6> 0.10.0 ± 0.00.4 ± 0.30.06
Firmicutes
Clostridiaceae2.8 ± 2.02.1 ± 1.0> 0.11.4 ± 0.53.4 ± 2.3> 0.1
Clostridium2.8 ± 2.02.1 ± 1.0> 0.11.4 ± 0.53.4 ± 2.3> 0.1
Enterococcaceae1.6 ± 0.60.9 ± 0.8> 0.11.8 ± 0.91.3 ± 0.5> 0.1
Enterococcus1.6 ± 0.60.9 ± 0.8> 0.11.8 ± 0.91.3 ± 0.5> 0.1
Erysipelotrichaceae4.6 ± 2.07.1 ± 3.8> 0.13.0 ± 1.16.6 ± 2.8> 0.1
Lachnospiraceae22.8 ± 5.719.5 ± 6.3> 0.133.1 ± 8.915.3 ± 4.2> 0.1
Blautia2.2 ± 1.45.4 ± 4.9> 0.14.3 ± 2.62.1 ± 2.0> 0.1
Coprococcus0.9 ± 0.70.6 ± 0.6> 0.10.9 ± 0.50.8 ± 0.8> 0.1
Peptostreptococcaceae1.2 ± 0.51.2 ± 0.7> 0.12.9 ± 0.80.2 ± 0.10.002§
Ruminococcaceae0.7 ± 0.30.4 ± 0.3> 0.11.2 ± 0.50.2 ± 0.20.08
Streptococcaceae4.7 ± 2.48.7 ± 6.8> 0.13.0 ± 1.17.3 ± 3.8> 0.1
Streptococcus4.6 ± 2.48.7 ± 6.8> 0.13.0 ± 1.17.3 ± 3.8> 0.1
Veillonellaceae5.0 ± 1.83.6 ± 2.0> 0.13.6 ± 2.25.4 ± 1.9> 0.1
Veillonella5.0 ± 1.83.6 ± 2.0> 0.13.5 ± 2.25.3 ± 1.9> 0.1
Verrucomicrobia
Verrucomicrobiaceae0.6 ± 0.60.6 ± 0.6> 0.11.6 ± 1.20.0 ± 0.00.001§
Akkermansia0.6 ± 0.60.6 ± 0.6> 0.11.6 ± 1.20.0 ± 0.00.001§
  • Note: SE = standard error.

  • * We assessed differential abundance of bacterial taxa using Metastats.

  • Taxa were excluded from this analysis if they did not exceed 1% relative abundance in at least 1 sample or were not present in at least 3 infants.

  • Values represent the percentages of all 16S gene sequences analyzed, after quality processing as described in Appendix 1 (available at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1503/cmaj.121189/-/DC1).

  • § p < 0.05 after correction for multiple testing.