Table 2:

Mode of delivery among women in the South Community Birth Program and matched controls receiving standard care

Mode of deliveryGroup; no. (%) of womenRR (95% CI)
Birth program n = 1238Standard care n = 1238
Spontaneous vaginal delivery784 (63.3)653 (52.7)1.25 (1.15–1.36)
Assisted vaginal delivery193 (15.6)198 (16.0)0.99 (0.88–1.09)
 Vacuum79 (6.4)104 (8.4)0.85 (0.72–1.01)
 Forceps114 (9.2)94 (7.6)1.11 (0.97–1.26)
Cesarean delivery261 (21.1)387 (31.3)0.76 (0.68–0.84)
 Nulliparous (n = 830 per group)200 (24.1)269 (32.4)0.81 (0.72–0.91)
 Multiparous (n = 408 per group)61 (15.0)118 (28.9)0.63 (0.50–0.78)
By primary caregiver
 Midwife
  Spontaneous vaginal delivery527 (66.5)98 (68.5)0.96 (0.90–1.03)
  Assisted vaginal delivery108 (13.6)11 (7.7)1.08 (1.01–1.16)
  Cesarean delivery157 (19.8)34 (23.8)0.96 (0.90–1.04)
 Family physician
  Spontaneous vaginal delivery255 (60.3)269 (59.0)1.03 (0.90–1.18)
  Assisted vaginal delivery79 (18.7)80 (17.5)1.04 (0.87–1.24)
  Cesarean delivery89 (21.0)107 (23.5)0.93 (0.78–1.10)
 Obstetrician
  Spontaneous vaginal delivery2 (8.7)286 (44.8)0.12 (0.02–0.52)
  Assisted vaginal delivery6 (26.1)107 (16.7)1.71 (0.69–4.25)
  Cesarean delivery15 (65.2)246 (38.5)2.88 (1.23–6.70)
Previous cesarean deliveryn = 75n = 105
 Attempted vaginal birth48 (64.0)16 (15.2)3.22 (2.25–4.62)
 Successful vaginal birth*33 (68.8)11 (68.8)1.00 (0.74–1.36)
  • Note: CI = confidence interval, RR = relative risk.

  • * Among women who attempted vaginal birth.