Table 2:

Estimated cost-effectiveness of diacetylmorphine compared with methadone in the treatment of chronic, refractory opioid dependence

Time horizon; treatmentCost, Can$ × 1000, mean (95% CI)Cost component, % of totalQALYs, mean (95% CI)Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, Can$ × 1000 per QALY gained, mean (95% CI)
TreatmentHealth resources utilizationCriminal activity and charges
1 year
Diacetylmorphine85.9 (63.8–116.7)17.74.278.10.86 (0.83–0.90)CS (CS–485.8)
Methadone87.7 (63.9–119.8)3.76.589.80.85 (0.81–0.89)
5 years
Diacetylmorphine387.7 (293.4–511.6)12.38.279.53.43 (3.26–3.59)CS (CS–103.4)
Methadone418.3 (297.0–579.0)2.511.286.23.32 (3.14–3.47)
10 years
Diacetylmorphine696.0 (504.9–960.0)10.411.178.55.61 (5.29–5.90)CS (CS–78.2)
Methadone743.8 (515.1–1059.7)2.314.083.85.39 (5.08–5.67)
Lifetime
Diacetylmorphine1096.1 (724.1–1707.2)9.314.176.77.92 (7.32–8.53)CS (CS–122.3)
Methadone1137.6 (736.8–1776.5)2.116.781.27.46 (6.91–8.01)
  • Note: CI = credibility interval, CS = cost-saving, QALY = quality-adjusted life-year.