Table 2:

Significant factors associated with the likelihood of PCI being performed instead of CABG surgery among patients who underwent revascularizion*

FactorOdds ratio (95% CI)p value
Patient
Age, yr (v. 65–74)
 < 501.4 (0.9–2.0)0.11
 50–641.1 (0.9–1.4)0.29
 ≥ 751.6 (1.2–2.1)< 0.001
Female (v. male)1.4 (1.1–1.7)0.003
Cardiac history and risk factors
 Diabetes (v. no diabetes)0.8 (0.6–0.9)0.01
 Previous PCI (v. no previous PCI)1.6 (1.2–2.2)0.002
Coronary anatomy (v. 3-vessel disease)
 1 vessel37.5 (27.9–50.4)< 0.001
 2 vessels5.6 (4.5–7.0)< 0.001
 Left main artery0.3 (0.2–0.4)< 0.001
 Prior CABG30.1 (18.7–48.6)< 0.001
Clinical indication (v. elective stable coronary artery disease)
 Unstable angina0.9 (0.7–1.2)0.68
 Non-ST-segment elevation MI1.3 (1.0–1.7)0.02
 Non-emergent ST-segment elevation MI1.6 (1.0–2.5)0.04
 Emergent ST-segment elevation MI7.8 (5.1–11.7)< 0.001
Physician
Interventional (v. non-interventional) cardiologist1.4 (1.1–1.7)0.01
Hospital
PCI:CABG ratio (v. low ratio [< 2.0])
 Low–medium (2.0–2.7)1.4 (0.9–2.1)0.16
 Medium–high (2.8–3.2)2.1 (1.3–3.1)< 0.001
 High (> 3.2)3.1 (2.0–4.9)< 0.001
  • Note: CABG = coronary artery bypass graft, CI = confidence interval, MI = myocardial infarction, PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention.

  • * The C-statistic for the model was 0.90. This analysis excludes patients for whom type of cardiologist was missing.