PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Benjamin Hibbert AU - Bradley Hayley AU - Robert S. Beanlands AU - Michel Le May AU - Richard Davies AU - Derek So AU - Jean-François Marquis AU - Marino Labinaz AU - Michael Froeschl AU - Edward R. O’Brien AU - Ian G. Burwash AU - George A. Wells AU - Ali Pourdjabbar AU - Trevor Simard AU - Harold Atkins AU - Christopher Glover TI - Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy for stem cell mobilization following anterior wall myocardial infarction: the CAPITAL STEM MI randomized trial AID - 10.1503/cmaj.140133 DP - 2014 Aug 05 TA - Canadian Medical Association Journal PG - E427--E434 VI - 186 IP - 11 4099 - http://www.cmaj.ca/content/186/11/E427.short 4100 - http://www.cmaj.ca/content/186/11/E427.full SO - CMAJ2014 Aug 05; 186 AB - Background: Small studies have yielded divergent results for administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) after acute myocardial infarction. Adequately powered studies involving patients with at least moderate left ventricular dysfunction are lacking.Methods: Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 45% after anterior-wall myocardial infarction were treated with G-CSF (10 μg/kg daily for 4 days) or placebo. After initial randomization of 86 patients, 41 in the placebo group and 39 in the G-CSF group completed 6-month follow-up and underwent measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by radionuclide angiography.Results: Baseline and 6-week mean ejection fraction was similar for the G-CSF and placebo groups: 34.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 32.6%–37.0%) v. 36.4% (95% CI 33.5%–39.2%) at baseline and 39.8% (95% CI 36.2%–43.4%) v. 43.1% (95% CI 39.2%–47.0%) at 6 weeks. However, G-CSF therapy was associated with a lower ejection fraction at 6 months relative to placebo (40.8% [95% CI 37.4%–44.2%] v. 46.0% [95% CI 42.7%–44.3%]). Both groups had improved left ventricular function, but change in left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in patients treated with G-CSF than in those who received placebo (5.7 [95% CI 3.4–8.1] percentage points v. 9.2 [95% CI 6.3–12.1] percentage points). One or more of a composite of several major adverse cardiac events occurred in 8 patients (19%) within each group, with similar rates of target-vessel revascularization.Interpretation: In patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction following anterior-wall infarction, G-CSF therapy was associated with a lower 6-month left ventricular ejection fraction but no increased risk of major adverse cardiac events. Future studies of G-CSF in patients with left ventricular dysfunction should be monitored closely for safety. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT00394498