Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • Classified ads
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Activate online account
    • Look up login
    • Earn CPD Credits
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
    • Activate subscription
    • Look up login
    • Manage account
    • Manage IPs
    • View Reports
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JPN

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JPN
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
  • Log in
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • Classified ads
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Activate online account
    • Look up login
    • Earn CPD Credits
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
    • Activate subscription
    • Look up login
    • Manage account
    • Manage IPs
    • View Reports
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Routine peripubertal circumcision?

Robert Darby
CMAJ August 09, 2011 183 (11) 1283-1284; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.111-2060
Robert Darby
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

MacDonald deserves credit for shifting the debate on circumcision away from inconclusive quibbles about the balance of risks and benefits,1 but it is not obvious that peripubertal boys are any more capable of giving consent than a baby. They lack maturity and sufficient knowledge; boys at 11 or 12 years of age are not considered competent to consent to sexual relations with others, and even if they agree to have sex, the other party will be guilty of sexual assault. If they cannot consent to sexual relations, they are certainly not competent to consent to having a part of their penis excised.

The practice with respect to genital surgeries should be no less strict than the rules governing sexual activity. If circumcision provides some protection against sexually transmitted infections (a contentious point2,3), the only logical age at which a male can legally consent to circumcision would be the same as that of consent for sexual purposes. If it is wrong to perform circumcision in infancy, it is equally wrong to perform it at any time before legal adulthood.

MacDonald’s contention that circumcision at puberty provides “the opportunity for informed choice … the boy can give assent” is contradicted by experience. Many tribal societies perform initiation rites on peripubertal boys and girls, sometimes involving circumcision, but the children have no more opportunity to decline the operation than to Ny to the moon. If they object, they are subject to violent coercion; if they run away, they are ostracized. Circumcision of boys at around 9 to 11 years of age is usual in South Korea and the Philippines, where social expectation, peer pressure and the fact that boys are still children subject to parental discipline means that they have little chance of saying, “No thanks.”4,5 Unless they can decline without prejudice to their future social status, there is no possibility of free choice.

The “medically important question” is not whether circumcision should be “routinely offered to young male adolescents rather than their baby brothers,” but how we can find an effective way of giving boys some protection against genital cutting?

References

  1. ↵
    1. MacDonald N
    . Male circumcision: get the timing right. CMAJ 2011;183:872.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Ferris JA,
    2. Richters J,
    3. Pitts MK,
    4. et al
    . Circumcision in Australia: further evidence of its effects on sexual health and wellbeing. Aust N Z J Public Health 2010;34:160–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Perera CL,
    2. Bridgewater FH,
    3. Thavaneswaran P,
    4. et al
    . Safety and efficacy of nontherapeutic male circumcision: a systematic review. Ann Fam Med 2010;8:64–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Pang MG,
    2. Kim DS
    . Extraordinarily high rates of male circumcision in South Korea: history and underlying causes. BJU Int 2002;89:48–54.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Lee RB
    . Filipino experience of ritual male circumcision: knowledge and insights for anti-circumcision advocacy. Cult Health Sex 2006;8:225–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 183 (11)
CMAJ
Vol. 183, Issue 11
9 Aug 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Routine peripubertal circumcision?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
Citation Tools
Routine peripubertal circumcision?
Robert Darby
CMAJ Aug 2011, 183 (11) 1283-1284; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.111-2060

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Routine peripubertal circumcision?
Robert Darby
CMAJ Aug 2011, 183 (11) 1283-1284; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.111-2060
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Doctor, physician, professor, teacher
  • Treatment options for obstructive sleep apnea
  • The conscience rights of Canadian physicians require protection
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Early releases
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Permission requests
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact

Copyright 2018, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire