Lead exposure in children is equivalent to alcohol exposure during pregnancy: there is no safe dose. No threshold value (below which lead has no apparent effect) has been identified.1 Warren Bell and Kelly O'Grady are certainly right in saying that we have no recent data on lead levels in Canadian children. When we mentioned in our article that lead poisoning was rare in Canada,2 we should have specified that this statement refers to cases requiring chelation therapy. Through discussions with medical toxicology colleagues working in Toronto and Montréal, I was able to identify only 7 cases in the past 10 years in which children required chelation for lead poisoning in those 2 cities: 3 children who were poisoned by unknown sources,3 2 children who had recently immigrated to Canada and were most likely poisoned in their countries of origin, 1 autistic child with pica and the case presented recently in CMAJ.2 Others may have existed but not come to the attention of medical toxicologists, but in those cases the levels were probably above the intervention level of 0.48 mmol/L but below the recognized chelation threshold of 2.17 mmol/L.4
We chose to present the case of the 4-year-old boy in CMAJ to illustrate that lead poisoning can occur if a child with pica eats paint with lead levels below those set by Canadian law. Many physicians think that such paint is lead free, but, as Kathleen Cooper points out, this is not the case. Blood lead level should be determined for any child with pica, regardless of the age of the child's home, because eating a large quantity of chips of so-called “lead-free” paint can result in lead levels that require intervention with or without chelation.
Benoit Bailey Department of Pediatrics Hôpital Sainte-Justine Montréal, Que.