|
From the Research Institute of The Hospital for Sick Children (Greer, Ng, Fisman), Toronto, Ont.; the Ontario Central Public Health Laboratory (Fisman), Toronto, Ont.; and The Australian National University (Ng), Canberra, Australia
Correspondence to: Dr. David N. Fisman, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Rm. 428, 123 Edward St., Toronto ON M5G 1E6; fax 416 813-5979; david.fisman{at}sickkids.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In April 2007, the panel issued a report on the impact of global climate change on human and animal populations.1 This report was based on about 30 000 observations of changes in physical and biological systems worldwide. More than 90% of these changes are attributable to human activities such as the combustion of fossil fuels.1,2 The panel's fourth assessment report includes projections for regions including North America. These projections include warmer temperatures (Figure 1), more rainfall because of an increased fraction of precipitation falling as rain rather than snow, and more frequent droughts, wildfires and extreme weather events such as hurricanes and tornados.1 Warming is predicted to be most severe in the northernmost latitudes.
|
Some of the health effects attributable to climate change are directly related to changing environmental conditions. The Public Health Agency of Canada anticipates increased burden of disease as a result of thermal stress and more frequent extreme weather events,3 and some projected direct effects of climate change on human health, such as heat-related morbidity and injuries, have been previously reviewed.4 However, climate and weather patterns are important physical components of complex ecosystems5 and any major change in the nonliving component of an ecosystem will affect living components, including microbes, insect vectors, animal reservoirs and susceptible humans, and change the incidence and distribution of infectious diseases.
The close relation between climate, environment and infectious disease in the developing world are well recognized. For example, the importance of rainfall and drought in the occurrence of malaria,6,7 the influence of the dry season on epidemic meningococcal disease in the sub-Saharan African "meningitis belt"8 and the importance of warm ocean waters in driving cholera occurrence in the Ganges River delta and elsewhere in Asia9 are well described. Indeed, there is widespread concern about the potential impact of global climate change on the distribution and burden of these and other infectious threats in the developing world.1,7
The relation between ecosystems, infectious diseases and global climate change are less intuitive in the context of more developed countries where clean drinking water, reduced exposure to insect vectors, higher-quality housing and other advantages partly mitigate such threats. However, climate changes projected to occur in the coming decades are likely to influence the burden and incidence of infectious diseases in more developed regions including North America. In this review, we describe the nature and direction of changes in infectious disease epidemiology that are likely to accompany global climate change and describe the challenges that these changes will pose to health care providers and public health agencies. We focus principally on Canada and the United States, including the Arctic regions of North America, where the effects of global climate change are likely to be most severe. We also include several illustrative examples from other highly developed regions such as the European Union and Australia. In particular, we review several zoonotic diseases of public health importance, the association between precipitation and water-borne diarrheal diseases, seasonal respiratory diseases with person-to-person transmission and endemic mycoses (Table 1).
|
This review is not meant to obscure the likelihood that the brunt of the increased incidence of infectious diseases related to climate change will occur in the same less-developed, economically poor countries that are currently most affected by infectious diseases.1,10 For more information about the projected changes in infectious disease epidemiology in these diverse regions of the world, we encourage readers to consult the panel report and other reports and reviews devoted to this topic.1,7,11,12
| Zoonotic and vector-borne diseases |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
In North America, other infectious diseases that may expand their ranges because of northern expansion of vector populations include such tick-borne threats as babesiosis, anaplasmoses and Powassan encephalitis in addition to mosquito-borne threats such as dengue. In Europe, the expansion of the range of ticks and other vectors (e.g., sandflies) may increase the incidence and distribution of Lyme disease,14 boutonneuse fever15 and leishmaniasis.16 In Australia, the southern expansion of mosquito ranges is expected to result in an increase in such endemic diseases as Ross River virus, Barmah Forest virus and Murray Valley encephalitis.17,18
The transmission of vector-borne zoonoses may also be enhanced by earlier onset of spring, resulting in a prolonged amplification cycle. West Nile virus, which appeared in Canada in 2002, has an amplification cycle that involves mosquitoes and birds. Human infections become more likely as the proportion of "bridge" vectors (mosquitoes that bite both birds and humans) increases. In temperate regions, virus amplification begins with the onset of mosquito activity in spring. Human risk peaks in late summer or early autumn, and risk decreases with the disappearance of mosquitoes in autumn. An earlier onset of spring would prolong the amplification cycle resulting in an increased incidence of human infection. The impact of increased precipitation on mosquito ecosystems is complicated. Transmission risk could increase because of increased mosquito breeding sites. Alternatively, increased numbers of mosquito predators and decreased geographic concentrations of amplifying hosts (i.e., birds) attributable to a rise in the distribution of water sources may lower the risk of transmission.11,19
Whether climate change will facilitate re-establishment of autochthonous (locally acquired) malaria in the United States and Canada, where it was once endemic,20 is unclear. However, prolonged amplification cycles and warmer winter temperatures may facilitate the establishment of imported mosquito-borne diseases in countries from which they have historically been absent. For example, in 2007 chikungunya fever, a mosquito-borne disease endemic in parts of Africa and Asia, caused a large outbreak of disease in northeastern Italy, presumably following importation of infected mosquitoes via boat or air.21 The onset of winter weather likely contributed to the control of this outbreak, but warming trends may make the control of future importation-related outbreaks more difficult.
Residents of temperate regions of North America may also be affected by increased incidence and distribution of vector-borne diseases in other countries because of high rates of travel to subtropical and tropical countries. For example, it is estimated that Canadians took over 2 million trips to Mexico, Cuba and the Dominican Republic in 2006 alone.22 As dengue and malaria activity are projected to increase in Latin America, the Caribbean, Asia and Africa, an increase in travel-related dengue fever and malaria in returning travellers is likely.1,9,23–25 Marked discrepancies in dengue incidence in contiguous geographical areas (e.g., along the US–Mexican border26) suggest that both vector abundance and economic factors, such as the availability of air conditioning, contribute to disease risk. Travellers who use more luxurious accommodations and insect repellents that contain diethyltoluamide (DEET) may be relatively protected.27 Nonetheless, the impact of such increases on local populations, combined with emerging resistance to antimalarial agents25 and the recent resurgence of malaria in a number of urban areas in Jamaica and India,28,29 are cause for substantial concern both for travel medicine practitioners and for those concerned about global health.
Climate change is also likely to impact the distribution and burden of zoonotic diseases that are not dependent on insect vectors for transmission. Pathogens such as the Sin Nombre virus, a cause of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, are harboured by rodent species that are especially abundant in the southwestern United States and in western states and provinces.30–32 Rodent population density appears to be a key driver of disease in humans,32 who are often infected after exposure to dust contaminated by rodent urine (e.g., while sweeping out storage spaces). Recent surges in hantavirus infection have been attributed to the El Niño-type weather conditions, which may become predominant with future climate change,30 suggesting that hantavirus pulmonary syndrome incidence may increase in coming decades. Climate change may similarly increase the risk of plague in western states and provinces.33
| Water-and food-borne diseases |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Water-borne diseases occur despite state-of-the-art water treatment technology. For example, a 1989 cryptosporidiosis outbreak tied to a municipal water supply in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, affected an estimated 400 000 people.34 The Walkerton, Ontario, disaster in 2000 underscored the vulnerability of populations to water-borne disease.35,36 The incidence of both water-and food-borne diseases is expected to increase as a result of climate change. Large water-borne disease outbreaks have been linked to extreme precipitation events, which are expected to increase in frequency in coming decades (Figure 3). In addition, most cases of water-and food-borne gastroenteritis, particularly illness related to Campylobacter and Salmonella, exhibit a distinct summertime pattern of occurrence.37 Although it is possible that seasonality is due to behavioural patterns (e.g., barbecuing or swimming in the summer), the association between warmer temperatures and disease suggests that rates of water-and food-borne illness are likely to increase with rising temperatures.
|
The incidence of pneumonic infections due to water-borne infectious agents, such as legionellosis (Legionnaire disease) and melioidosis, is also likely to be affected by climate change. Legionellosis incidence peaks during warmer months and risk appears to increase with rainy, humid weather.38 Melioidosis is an infectious disease caused by the bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei and is endemic in southeast Asia and Australia. Cyclones appear to be associated with increased risk of severe melioidosis, perhaps because of aerosolization of the bacterium by stormy weather.39
Globally, the water-borne enteric disease most likely to increase in the face of global climate change is cholera, a diarrheal disease with a high case-fatality rate caused by infection with toxigenic strains of Vibrio cholerae, which remains an important cause of death in the developing world. Risk increases with warmer water temperatures, suggesting that global cholera activity may increase sharply in the face of climate change.40 Such increases pose a risk not only to developing countries, but also to developed countries via importation of disease. Nontoxigenic strains of V. cholerae and other noncholera Vibrio (e.g., Vibrio parahemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus) may also become more frequent agents of disease as a result of increasing ocean temperatures and increasing frequency of extreme weather events. For example, cases of illness due to these micro-organisms occurred in association with Hurricane Katrina in 2005.41
| Seasonality of communicable diseases |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Climate change also has the potential to indirectly affect communicable disease transmission. The forced migration of people because of drought or flooding could increase the transmission of many communicable diseases because of enhanced intermingling of populations that have previously been isolated from one another. Large-scale migrations have been associated with surges in communicable diseases and emergence of novel infections throughout recorded history. Forced migration may ultimately be a more important driver of changes in infectious disease epidemiology than other effects described in this review.
| Endemic mycoses |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Warmer, drier summers may have facilitated the establishment of Cryptococcus gattii in Canada.46 This fungus had previously been seen only in tropical and subtropical regions (particularly those in Australia), but emerged on Vancouver Island in 1999, where it has caused more than 100 cases of human illness in addition to illness in domestic animals.
| Arctic regions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Increases in ocean temperatures have been linked to outbreaks of gastroenteritis as a result of infection by noncholera Vibrio species, which may have been acquired through consumption of contaminated seafood. Likewise, the risk of botulism from consumption of traditional fermented meats is enhanced by increased ambient air temperatures.
Changing ecosystems also disrupt the ecology of wildlife populations in ways that are likely to increase the risk of zoonotic disease. Climate-driven increases in rabbit and predator populations (e.g., fox) may augment the risk of tularemia and rabies.47 Warmer temperatures and longer summers increase the number of amplification cycles for parasites of food animals (e.g., Trichinella and Echinococcus species) and lead to longer summer hunting seasons. These parasites cause diseases that are largely concentrated in northern communities,48,49 and the burden of parasitic diseases in the North may increase with warming.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At a more basic level in North America, the wide ranging and unpredictable health effects that are likely to result from climate change highlight the need for strengthening public health infrastructure related to disease surveillance, food and water safety, control of insect vectors and animal reservoirs of disease, and public health outbreak response. Although mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions cannot be regarded as the primary responsibility of the health care system or medical practitioners, physicians and other health care providers are highly credible opinion leaders and advocacy on environmental issues can be seen as a natural extension of the medical profession's interest in enhancing the health of the communities it serves.
In less developed countries, changes in infectious disease burden due to climate change will be greater than those seen in the developed world, and enhancement of public health infrastructure (particularly related to surveillance and outbreak forecasting,7 provision of safe food and water, and vector control) will be the key to mitigating the effects of climate change. The global scope of these challenges and the fact that infectious diseases do not respect national borders highlight the need for multinational and collaborative scientific efforts to control disease. There are currently many national and international initiatives underway that are directly or indirectly related to climate change, infectious diseases and global health (Table 2).
|
Finally, the importance of animal and environmental reservoirs of disease suggests that interdisciplinary communication between health professionals, veterinarians, environmental scientists, ecologists, geographers and economists seeking to understand climate change will be key to protecting people in North America and worldwide against these threats. Rigorous cross-disciplinary studies using a variety of methodologic tools will enable us to predict the transmission dynamics of diseases under different climate scenarios and estimate the cost-effectiveness of mitigation strategies. The performance of such high-quality research will depend on the extent to which such endeavours are embraced by decision-makers, the research community and funding agencies.
Key points of the article
Global climate change is occurring as a result of greenhouse gases created by human activities. Changes in climate and associated changes in weather and other environmental exposures will have important consequences for human health.
Climate change will alter the relations between microbes, insect vectors, animal reservoirs of infectious diseases and humans, and will alter the burden and distribution of infectious diseases of public health importance.
Warmer temperatures and altered rainfall patterns are likely to increase the range and burden of vector-borne infectious diseases in North America and elsewhere.
Altered patterns of rainfall and increased frequency of extreme weather events are likely to influence the incidence of water-borne gastrointestinal and respiratory diseases in North America and elsewhere.
The best defence against increases in infectious disease burden related to climate change lies in strengthening existing public health infrastructure. Physicians, as opinion leaders, can also influence public policy related to greenhouse gas emissions.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Contributors: All of the authors contributed to the conception of this article, the acquisition of data, and drafting and revision of the manuscript. All of the authors provided final approval of the version to be published.
Acknowledgements: All of the authors receive financial support from the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R21AI065826-01A1) and from the Early Researcher Award program of the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation.
Competing interests: None declared.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Articles
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Ivanek, Y. T. Grohn, M. T. Wells, A. J. Lembo Jr., B. D. Sauders, and M. Wiedmann Modeling of Spatially Referenced Environmental and Meteorological Factors Influencing the Probability of Listeria Species Isolation from Natural Environments Appl. Envir. Microbiol., September 15, 2009; 75(18): 5893 - 5909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||