CMAJ • September 11, 2007; 177 (6). doi:10.1503/cmaj.1070082.
© 2007 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, E. J.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, E. J.L., BSc
Related Collections
Right arrow Research & Publication ethics

Letters

Reed Elsevier's arms business

Edward J.L. Armstrong, BSc

Medical student, Imperial College, London, UK

CMAJ should be applauded for its news article highlighting the conflict of interest in Reed Elsevier's roles as a medical publisher and an organizer of arms fairs.1 Following similar articles in other journals,2–4 petitions by academics, actions of major shareholders and protests by the Campaign Against Arms Trade and the Global Health Advocacy Project, Reed Elsevier announced on June 1, 2007, that its subsidiary company Reed Exhibitions would "divest of all [its] defence shows" as they are "no longer compatible with Reed Elsevier's position as a leading publisher of scientific, medical, legal and business content."5 This marks a rethink from its previous position that "the company does not regard this as a conflict of interest."1 Although dubious arms exhibitions will no doubt continue to be held, the success of this particular campaign demonstrates the potential impact of the global medical community when it acts in concert.

Footnotes

Competing interests: Edward Armstrong is a member of the Global Health Advocacy Project.


REFERENCES

  1. Sibbald B. The Lancet protests against its publisher's arms fair business. CMAJ 2007;176:1265.[Free Full Text]
  2. The editors of The Lancet reply. Lancet 2007;334: 547-8.
  3. Young C, Godlee F. Reed Elsevier's arms trade. BMJ 2007;334:547.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Armstrong E. Taking the lead against Reed Elsevier. J R Soc Med 2007;100:256.[Free Full Text]
  5. Important announcement: divestment of defence exhibitions [press release]. London (UK): Reed Elsevier; 2007 June 1. Available: www.reed-elsevier.com/index.cfm?articleid=2084 (accessed 2007 Aug 7).




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, E. J.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, E. J.L., BSc
Related Collections
Right arrow Research & Publication ethics