|
| Research letter |
From the Department of Medicine and the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Juurlink); the Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital (Park-Wyllie); the Department of Medicine and the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, University Health Network (Kapral); and the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Juurlink, Park-Wyllie, Kapral), Toronto, Ont.
Correspondence to: Dr. David N. Juurlink, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, G Wing 106, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto ON M4N 3M5; fax: 416 480-6048; dnj{at}ices.on.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Internet allows potential claimants ready access to personal-injury lawyers, and it allows law firms to easily identify potential claimants. The use of the Internet by lawyers to advertise their services is permissible provided that the communications are not false or misleading.2
Biomedical publications can rapidly influence medical practice,3 but the extent to which such publications influence litigation is unknown. We studied the extent to which an article published in a general medical journal, along with related events, influenced Internet-based solicitation of plaintiffs for personal-injury litigation.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Beginning on the date of acceptance of the manuscript (Feb. 9, 2006), we conducted daily Internet searches for websites offering legal representation to people who had possibly been injured by Tequin. Using the Internet search engine Google, each of the authors determined the number of "hits" each day using a structured search strategy that was piloted and refined in the weeks before the manuscript's acceptance. For the purposes of this study, we defined a "hit" as any website that contributed to the total website count generated using the search strategy, regardless of whether duplicate or highly similar websites were included. The goal of our search was specificity rather than sensitivity.
Search strategy
We used the advanced search feature provided by Google (available at www.google.ca/advanced_search). We searched for websites that contained all of the search phrases "Tequin," "lawsuit," "lawyer" and "personal injury," and that included any of the words "hypoglycemia," "hyperglycemia," "glucose" or "sugar." We excluded websites that contained "pharmacy" to avoid the identification of online pharmacies. We restricted our search to English-language websites, and we did not impose geographic restrictions.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Within a week of the article's early release, about 100 Internet hits were identified each day. This number increased to more than 300 hits within 1 week of full publication in print. Following a transient decline, the manufacturer's withdrawal of the drug was associated with an additional increase in the number of hits to about 400 per day. Within-rater agreement for observations throughout the study interval was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient –0.814).
To investigate the durability of this phenomenon, we repeated the search 1 year following the article's early release (Mar. 1, 2007). At that time, we identified 522 websites that were soliciting personal-injury claimants.
| Interpretation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A detailed review of the contents of each identified website every day would have been prohibitive; however, we examined many of the websites on an informal and periodic basis. Most websites appeared to be for law firms in North America (mainly in the United States), possibly because we restricted our search to English-language websites. Many sites offered representation for a wide array of drug-and device-related lawsuits (e.g., Vioxx, Accutane, Paxil, Ortho-Evra), and the websites invited prospective claimants to submit details of their cases online.
Some limitations of this study deserve mention. Although our search strategy was chosen for its specificity, it is possible that some hits did not reflect solicitation of personal-injury claimants. In addition, some hits may have represented duplicate links to the same group of attorneys, and the number of websites that were not identified by this strategy is unknown. The period of baseline Internet activity before the article's online release was relatively short (20 days) as a result of the expedited publication process. However, this is of little consequence given the magnitude of the change in Internet activity and because we did not use the baseline period to generate statistical inferences.
In conclusion, we found that publication of an article in a general medical journal can dramatically influence Internet-based solicitation of litigants for personal-injury claims.
| Footnotes |
|---|
This article has been peer reviewed.
Contributors: David Juurlink conceived the project and drafted the manuscript. All of the authors contributed to the design of the project, data collection and revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All of the authors gave approval of the final version for publication. David Juurlink assumes responsibility for the manuscript as a whole.
Acknowledgements: We thank Alex Kiss PhD for statistical advice.
David Juurlink and Moira Kapral are supported by New Investigator Awards and Laura Park-Wyllie is supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research.
Competing interests: David Juurlink taught a continuing medical education lecture on drug interactions for Bristol-Myers Squibb in 2005. Content of the lecture was the author's own.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Lexchin MSc MD Information about a discontinued drug Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 11, 2008; 178(6): 730 - 730. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||