CMAJ • September 13, 2005; 173 (6). doi:10.1503/cmaj.1050097.
© 2005 CMA Media Inc. or its licensors
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCutcheon, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCutcheon, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other women's health
Right arrow Other obstetrics & gynecology
Right arrow Family planning, contraception

Letters
Correspondance

Emergency contraception

Garth McCutcheon

President, Canadian Pharmacists Association, Ottawa, Ont.

A recent CMAJ editorial1 on oral emergency contraception asked, "Why ... must competent women ... be regarded as fair game for unwanted questioning and unsought advice — at their own expense?" This undermines the valuable counselling services that pharmacists provide.

A pharmacist has studied drugs for a minimum of 4 years, is trained to provide emergency contraception services and is accessible evenings and weekends when a woman cannot get an appointment with her family doctor. This would seem to reflect a policy on scopes of practice issued jointly by the CMA, the Canadian Pharmacists Association and the Canadian Nurses Association: "scopes of practice statements should promote safe, ethical, high-quality care that responds to the needs of patients and the public in a timely manner, is affordable and is provided by competent health care providers."2

We agree with CMAJ that women should not have to pay for these services. The Canadian Pharmacists Association believes that this medically necessary service should be covered as part of the government's insured health services. If Plan B were available everywhere, the result would be a new cost barrier to access because drug plans will not pay for a product that a woman can pick up in a convenience store.

References

  1. Emergency contraception moves behind the counter [editorial]. CMAJ 2005;172(7):845.[Free Full Text]
  2. Canadian Medical Association. Scopes of practice [policy]. CMAJ 2002;166(2):236-7.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCutcheon, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCutcheon, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other women's health
Right arrow Other obstetrics & gynecology
Right arrow Family planning, contraception