 Advertisement | ||||||||
 | ||||||||
|
||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
|
| Research letter |
From the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (all authors), and the Department of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto (Adlaf and Mann), Toronto, Ont.
Correspondence to: Dr. Edward M. Adlaf, Head, Population and Life Course Studies, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Russell St., Toronto ON M5S 2S1; fax 416 595-6899; edward_adlaf{at}camh.net
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract References |
|---|
Although some research has monitored the prevalence of drinking and driving among adolescents, which is now about 15%,6,9 little is known about the risk of injury associated with driving after the use of drugs such as cannabis or with secondary exposure such as being a passenger in a car driven by a drunk driver. These 2 issues are of concern given that US data suggest about one-third of adolescents have ridden with a driver who had been drinking10,11,12,13 and that about 9% of Ontario drivers aged 18–19 years reported driving after cannabis use.14 We present here data on these indicators from a representative sample of Ontario students who participated in the Ontario Student Drug Use Survey (OSDUS).
The OSDUS is funded by the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, and has been conducted every 2 years since 1977. We analyzed data from the 2001 survey. The survey used a 2-stage cluster design (school, class) and included 4211 students in grades 7 to 13 from 41 school boards and 106 schools (43 elementary, 63 secondary). The student cooperation rate was 71%. This study was approved by the joint Research Ethics Board of the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health and the University of Toronto.
To maximize questionnaire coverage, the OSDUS uses random half samples for selected questionnaire items. Our estimates are based on 3 samples: passenger involvement was determined from the responses of 1846 students in a random half sample of all students; drunk-driving involvement was determined from the responses of 1119 students in grades 10 to 13 from the full sample who had a driver's licence; and cannabis involvement was derived from the responses of 508 students in a half sample of drivers in grades 10 to 13.
Self-administered questionnaires were administered by staff of the Institute for Social Research, York University, in a classroom setting. The students were asked 3 questions: "How often in the last 12 months did you ride in a car or other vehicle driven by someone who had been drinking alcohol?"; "How often in the last 12 months have you driven within an hour of drinking 2 or more drinks of alcohol?"; and "How often in the last 12 months have you driven within an hour of using marijuana or hashish?" For analysis purposes, responses were binary coded indicating involvement at least once during the 12 months before the survey. Further details regarding the study are available from the authors.6 All estimates were weighted, and variance and statistical tests were corrected for the complex sample design.
Our findings are summarized in Table 1. In all, 31.9% of the students reported being a passenger in a car driven by someone who had been drinking. Passenger involvement was unrelated to sex but did differ significantly by grade. Of the students in grades 10 to 13 who had a driver's licence, 15.1% reported driving within an hour after consuming 2 or more drinks; the proportion varied significantly by sex and grade. Of the half sample of drivers, 19.7% reported driving within an hour after using cannabis; the rates varied significantly by sex only.
|
Our study has limitations, the main one being that the data were self-reported and may have been subject to nonresponse bias. However, this source of bias would most likely serve to underestimate true behaviour.
Three of our findings have important public health implications that require further research and monitoring. First, the 15% of students with a driver's licence who reported driving after drinking is excessive, particularly since almost all were under the legal drinking age, and most had a graduated licence, for which the legal BAC limit is zero. Second, that nearly one-third of the students reported having ridden in a car driven by someone who had been drinking — an exposure associated with the largest risk factor for the leading cause of death among adolescents1 — is of great concern. Third, driving after cannabis use is a risk behaviour that may be of similar magnitude to driving after drinking.15 Although there are no earlier data to evaluate trends, the potential exposure may be substantial since a sizeable proportion of adolescent students are drivers (30%) and have used cannabis (30%).6
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Contributors: Dr. Adlaf and Ms. Paglia were involved in the study design, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, and manuscript preparation. Dr. Mann was involved in the data analysis and interpretation and the manuscript preparation. All authors approved the final version of the article.
Competing interests: None declared.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractReferences |
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | HELP | SEARCH |
|
|||||
|
Copyright 1995-2003, Canadian Medical Association. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329
(e) 0820-3946 (p)
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association. |
|||||
