|
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
Correspondence to: Dr. Michiel C. Van den Hof, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, 5980 University Ave., Halifax NS B3H 4N1; fax 902 425-1125; michiel.vandenhof{at}iwk.nshealth.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: For the 10-year period from Jan. 1, 1991, to Dec. 31, 2000, we retrospectively extracted the total number of births in Nova Scotia and the number of live births and stillbirths with open NTDs from the Nova Scotia Atlee Perinatal Database as well as the number of terminated pregnancies affected by NTDs from the Fetal Anomaly Database. We determined the total annual incidence of all open NTDs, and of the subgroups spina bifida and anencephaly, per 1000 births in the province during the periods before (19911994) and after (19951998) folic acid supplementation initiatives were begun but before folic acid fortification of grain products was implemented, and during the periods before (19911997) and after (19982000) fortification.
Results: In the period after supplementation initiatives were begun but before fortification was implemented, the incidence of open NTDs did not change significantly: the mean annual rate was 2.55 per 1000 births during 19911994 and 2.61 per 1000 births during 19951997 (relative risk [RR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.771.35). After the fortification was implemented the incidence of open NTDs decreased by more than 50%: the mean annual rate was 2.58 per 1000 births during 19911997 and 1.17 per 1000 births during 19982000 (relative risk 0.46, 95% CI 0.320.66).
Interpretation: The recommendations for folic acid supplementation alone did not appear to succeed in reducing the incidence of open NTDs in Nova Scotia, whereas the fortification of grain products with folic acid did result in a significant reduction in the incidence.
On the basis of this research, it became apparent that women planning pregnancies should be advised to take additional folic acid for 2 months before conception and throughout the first trimester.5 The amount would depend on risk factors for open NTDs. Although the importance of folic acid was highlighted in 1991, a recommendation for preconceptional supplementation in Nova Scotia was not issued until February 1993.3,6 Because half of pregnancies are unplanned,7 health authorities subsequently recommended that all women capable of becoming pregnant should take folic acid supplements.5,6,7,8,9 In late 1993 the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada recommended that all women of child-bearing age consider taking 0.4 mg of folic acid or an adequate dietary equivalent daily,8 and in 1994 the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination further emphasized the importance of folic acid supplementation.9
Despite the importance of folic acid, many women still did not follow or were unaware of supplementation recommendations to prevent open NTDs. Between 1993 and 1999, studies showed that less than 45% of pregnant women reported having taken folic acid before conception.10,11,12,13 As a result, investigators studied the effects of folic acid fortification as a means of increasing the daily intake of this vitamin.14,15 Depending on the level of fortification, this was found to be effective at increasing serum folate levels to those that would correspond to a reduction of 22%41% in the incidence of open NTDs.15 In March 1996 the US Food and Drug Administration ordered that fortification with folate (0.14 mg per 100 g of grain) of all enriched grain products be implemented no later than Jan. 1, 1998.16 Health Canada endorsed a similar fortification plan (0.15 mg per 100 g of grain) to be completed by Nov. 1, 1998.17,18 This degree of fortification was aimed at reducing the annual incidence of open NTDs by an estimated 22%.15 A recent large study on the effect of folic acid fortification in the United States showed a reduction of 19% in NTDs.19 The data were retrieved from birth certificates, which raises validity concerns and does not take into account the large proportion of NTDs that are prenatally diagnosed and result in therapeutic abortion.19 Population-based studies that include all NTDs (in live births, stillbirths and terminated pregnancies) have not previously been published and are needed to validate folic acid fortification measures.
The objective of our study was to evaluate the annual incidence of all open NTDs, including those occurring in stillbirths and terminated pregnancies, in Nova Scotia over a 10-year period. We identified the periods before and after folic acid supplementation initiatives were begun and the periods before and after folic acid fortification was implemented in order to study the effect of public health measures on the incidence of all open NTDs and the subgroups spina bifida and anencephaly.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nova Scotia offers both antenatal ultrasonographic and maternal serum
-fetoprotein screening for prenatal diagnosis of NTDs. All terminations of pregnancies affected by fetal anomalies in this province are undertaken in a single tertiary care centre, and the information is encoded and entered in the Fetal Anomaly Database by a trained person who helped develop the database and manages it. The information on fetal anomalies includes data on antenatal findings, and the final diagnosis is determined through postmortem pathologic examination or gross examination of fetal remains. Combining the data from the Nova Scotia Atlee Perinatal Database and the Fetal Anomaly Database allows for accurate population-based studies on birth defects. Final data on all births with open NTDs were available from both databases to Dec. 31, 2000. Because both databases provide identical specific variables on NTDs, affected cases were further divided into the subgroups spina bifida and anencephaly, as determined by antenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis, postmortem examination and examination at delivery.
Incidence rates were calculated as the total number of open NTDs occurring in live births, stillbirths and terminated pregnancies in Nova Scotia over the study period. We considered 19911994 to be the period before folic acid supplementation initiatives were begun and 19951997 as the period when public health measures on folic acid supplementation were in place but fortification had not yet begun. In 1996 concerns about the success of public health initiatives for supplementation led to the directive that grain products be fortified with folic acid by 1998. Although fortification may have begun in 1996, it was not complete until mid-1997.16,17,18 Therefore, we considered 19911997 as the period before folic acid fortification and 19982000 as the period after fortification.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
There was no change in the total annual incidence of open NTDs in the period after folic acid supplementation initiatives were begun but before fortification was implemented (19951998): the mean annual incidence was 2.55 per 1000 births during 19911994 and 2.61 per 1000 births during 19951997 (relative risk [RR] 1.02, 95% CI 0.771.35; p = 0.87) (Table 1). Similarly, the mean annual incidence of spina bifida did not change significantly (1.44 and 1.60 per 1000 births respectively) (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.791.60; p = 0.64) (Table 2). Although there was a slight decline in the mean incidence of anencephaly after supplementation (from 1.00 to 0.82 per 1000 births), this change did not reach statistical significance (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.511.32; p = 0.49) (Table 3).
|
|
The total annual incidence of open NTDs fell by 54% after the implementation of folic acid fortification, from 2.58 per 1000 births on average during 19911997 to 1.17 per 1000 births during 19982000 (Table 1) (RR 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.320.66; p < 0.001). In the subgroup of spina bifida, the mean annual incidence decreased from 1.51 per 1000 births before to 0.62 per 1000 births after fortification (Table 2) (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.250.67; p < 0.001). Similarly, for anencephaly the mean annual incidence decreased from 0.93 to 0.38 per 1000 births after fortification (Table 3) (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.220.77; p = 0.004).
| Interpretation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our data show that, in the years before fortification, public education on the importance of folic acid supplementation had no significant effect on the incidence of open NTDs (Table 2). Because folic acid supplements taken before conception are known to be effective in preventing open NTDs, the lack of change in incidence rates was presumably due to an inability to change women's behaviour in taking preconceptual supplements. A random survey of 167 pregnant Nova Scotian women in 2001 showed that less than 50% had taken folic acid supplements before conception; other studies have shown similarly poor compliance rates.10,11,12,13,32
Because of the number of unplanned pregnancies and the failure of the folic acid supplementation strategies on their own, fortification of food with folic acid was initiated.33 Fortification of food with nutrients has historically been successful in preventing such conditions as goiter (iodine deficiency), rickets (vitamin D deficiency), beri beri (thiamine deficiency), pellagra (niacin deficiency) and anemia (iron deficiency).31 With folic acid fortification, there was concern about the risk of masking the diagnosis of pernicious anemia and its neurological sequelae. This condition primarily affects elderly people, but even in this group less than 1% of people over age 60 would be affected.31 After careful deliberation, the US Food and Drug Administration called for folic acid fortification, but at a level that normally would limit daily intake to less than 1 mg.16 This compromise was to ensure safety and at the same time allow a benefit to pregnant women that would correspond to a reduction of 6%31% in the incidence of open NTDs.15
The results of our population-based study suggest that the folic acid fortification strategy was successful. In Canada folic acid fortification of grain products was mandated to begin in November 1998 at levels similar to those in the United States; however, most flour and pasta products were fortified as early as 1997 to harmonize with the US regulations, which came into effect on Jan. 18, 1998.16,17,18 With the understanding that most fortification was completed by mid-1997, we chose 1998 as the start of the post-fortification period. Fortification should have a relatively abrupt effect, both on serum folate levels and on the incidence of open NTDs. Two studies have shown increased serum folate levels after fortification.34,35 Our results showed a highly significant drop in the total incidence of open NTDs, taking into account all affected pregnancies (live births, stillbirths and terminated pregnancies); this dramatic drop was observed for both spina bifida and anencephaly. The inclusion of terminated pregnancies is particularly important because more than 50% of all affected pregnancies in Nova Scotia now result in therapeutic abortion. A failure to include terminated pregnancies may underestimate the benefit of folic acid fortification.19
The greater than anticipated reduction in the prevalence of open NTDs in our study could have been due to the fact that women may be receiving more folic acid from fortification than was originally calculated or that the calculated response was underestimated.36 Alternatively, a higher background prevalence of open NTDs in Nova Scotia may reflect a population that was more sensitive to the influence of a folic acid effect. The abrupt decline that started in 1998 has continued, presumably because of more complete folic acid exposure as pre-fortification products are depleted. There would also be some crossover effect, as pregnancies delivered in early 1998 would be less likely to have been influenced by fortified products during early gestation (mid-1997) than pregnancies delivered later. For these reasons, it is expected that the reduction in incidence of open NTDs may be greater than 54%. If this significant decline can be verified for other geographic areas, it may suggest that the current level of fortification is adequate and that the controversial call for higher-dose fortification should await further studies.37,38 Although our study highlights the effect of folic acid fortification, it does not preclude the additional benefit of supplementation. Undoubtedly, clinicians and researchers would agree that folic acid supplements remain an important adjuvant to fortification and that public education measures should not be abandoned.
Our study has limitations related to the arbitrary definitions used for the supplementation and fortification periods. The beginning of the supplementation period is poorly defined, and thus we chose the pre- and post-supplementation years on the basis of when public health measures were initiated and guidelines from relevant health authorities were released. In addition, mapping a temporal relation between folic acid supplementation and fortification strategies and the incidence of open NTDs does not prove a causeeffect relation, although it is highly suggestive.
Our results help to validate the decision to have food fortified with folic acid and may encourage the implementation of fortification in countries that have not yet implemented such strategies. The prevention of birth defects is a challenging goal, but current fortification measures appear to have successfully resulted in a reduction of at least 54% in the incidence of open NTDs in Nova Scotia. The effect of fortification in areas where the prevalence of NTDs is lower requires further study, as does the safety and long-term effects of fortification.
ß See related articles pages 237 and 255
| Footnotes |
|---|
Contributors: All of the authors were involved in developing the idea for this study. Most of the data analysis was undertaken by Dr. Persad, with some assistance by Dr. Dubé. Drs. Persad and Van den Hof were the principal authors; all other coauthors contributed to the revising of the article. All authors take full responsibility for the manuscript and its conclusions.
Acknowledgement: We acknowledge the Nova Scotia Atlee Perinatal Database and the Fetal Anomaly Database for contributing relevant data for our study.
Competing interests: None declared.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. L Bailey, K. W Dodd, J. J Gahche, J. T Dwyer, M. A McDowell, E. A Yetley, C. A Sempos, V. L Burt, K. L Radimer, and M. F. Picciano Total folate and folic acid intake from foods and dietary supplements in the United States: 2003-2006 Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2010; 91(1): 231 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Molloy, P. N. Kirke, J. F. Troendle, H. Burke, M. Sutton, L. C. Brody, J. M. Scott, and J. L. Mills Maternal Vitamin B12 Status and Risk of Neural Tube Defects in a Population With High Neural Tube Defect Prevalence and No Folic Acid Fortification Pediatrics, March 1, 2009; 123(3): 917 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H Zeisel Importance of methyl donors during reproduction Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2009; 89(2): 673S - 677S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Mills and T. C. Carter Invited Commentary: Preventing Neural Tube Defects and More via Food Fortification? Am. J. Epidemiol., January 1, 2009; 169(1): 18 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-I. Kim Folic Acid Supplementation and Cancer Risk: Point Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2008; 17(9): 2220 - 2225. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bognar, A. Ponyi, P. Hauser, J. Muller, T. Constantin, Z. Jakab, D. Schuler, and M. Garami Improper Supplementation Habits of Folic Acid Intake by Hungarian Pregnant Women: Improper Recommendations J. Am. Coll. Nutr., August 1, 2008; 27(4): 499 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. De Wals, F. Tairou, M. I. Van Allen, S.-H. Uh, R. B. Lowry, B. Sibbald, J. A. Evans, M. C. Van den Hof, P. Zimmer, M. Crowley, et al. Reduction in Neural-Tube Defects after Folic Acid Fortification in Canada N. Engl. J. Med., July 12, 2007; 357(2): 135 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Blacher, S. Czernichow, M. Raphael, C. Roussel, B. Chadefaux-Vekemans, G. Morineau, S. Giraudier, A. Tibi, O. Henry, M. Vayssiere, et al. Very Low Oral Doses of Vitamin B-12 Increase Serum Concentrations in Elderly Subjects with Food-Bound Vitamin B-12 Malabsorption J. Nutr., February 1, 2007; 137(2): 373 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nikkila, H. Rydhstrom, and B. Kallen The incidence of spina bifida in Sweden 1973-2003: the effect of prenatal diagnosis Eur J Public Health, December 1, 2006; 16(6): 660 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Tamura and M. F. Picciano Folate and human reproduction Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2006; 83(5): 993 - 1016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Ulrich and J. D. Potter Folate supplementation: too much of a good thing? Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2006; 15(2): 189 - 193. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nathoo, C. P. Holmes, and A. Ostry An analysis of the development of Canadian food fortification policies: the case of vitamin B Health Promot. Int., December 1, 2005; 20(4): 375 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Grosse, N. J. Waitzman, P. S. Romano, and J. Mulinare Reevaluating the Benefits of Folic Acid Fortification in the United States: Economic Analysis, Regulation, and Public Health Am J Public Health, November 1, 2005; 95(11): 1917 - 1922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Busby, L. Abramsky, H. Dolk, B. Armstrong, and a Eurocat Folic Acid Working Group Preventing neural tube defects in Europe: population based study BMJ, March 12, 2005; 330(7491): 574 - 575. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D Stark, R. J Pawlosky, S. Beblo, M. Murthy, V. P Flanagan, J. Janisse, M. Buda-Abela, H. Rockett, J. E Whitty, R. J Sokol, et al. Status of plasma folate after folic acid fortification of the food supply in pregnant African American women and the influences of diet, smoking, and alcohol consumption Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2005; 81(3): 669 - 677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-I. Kim Will mandatory folic acid fortification prevent or promote cancer? Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2004; 80(5): 1123 - 1128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Lamers, R. Prinz-Langenohl, R. Moser, and K. Pietrzik Supplementation with [6S]-5-methyltetrahydrofolate or folic acid equally reduces plasma total homocysteine concentrations in healthy women Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2004; 79(3): 473 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Krajinovic, S. Lamothe, D. Labuda, E. Lemieux-Blanchard, Y. Theoret, A. Moghrabi, and D. Sinnett Role of MTHFR genetic polymorphisms in the susceptibility to childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia Blood, January 1, 2004; 103(1): 252 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Hertrampf, F. Cortes, J. D. Erickson, M. Cayazzo, W. Freire, L. B. Bailey, C. Howson, G. P. A. Kauwell, and C. Pfeiffer Consumption of Folic Acid-Fortified Bread Improves Folate Status in Women of Reproductive Age in Chile J. Nutr., October 1, 2003; 133(10): 3166 - 3169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Bailey, G. C. Rampersaud, and G. P. A. Kauwell Folic Acid Supplements and Fortification Affect the Risk for Neural Tube Defects, Vascular Disease and Cancer: Evolving Science, J. Nutr., June 1, 2003; 133(6): 1961S - 1968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Oakley Jr Folic acid fortification: time for a concentrated effort Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 15, 2002; 167(8): 848 - 848. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Van den Hof and V. L. Persad Folic acid fortification: time for a concentrated effort Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 15, 2002; 167(8): 848 - 849. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Kadir and D. L. Economides Neural tube defects and periconceptional folic acid Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 1, 2002; 167(3): 255 - 256. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||