This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Latowsky, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Latowsky, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sociology
Right arrow Suicide
CMAJ • June 12, 2001; 164 (12)
© 2001 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors

Letters
Correspondance

Suicide and psychiatry

Mark Latowsky

Department of Family and Community Medicine University of Toronto Toronto, Ont.

In a book review in CMAJ, Paul Links criticizes Fatal Freedom: the Ethics and Politics of Suicide as a cheap, artificial and ill-conceived attempt at public theatre.1 He claims that it is simply a repackaging of Thomas Szasz' central thesis on the medicalization of mental health, suicide being his latest example.

Although I am tempted to agree, Links has not correctly articulated Szasz' central thesis: that emotional, cognitive or behavioural syndromes without pathologic correlates are not illnesses. It is this belief that must be debated.

Are all people who commit suicide necessarily ill? Studies have shown that the strong psychopathologic correlates of suicide (depressed mood, distorted, negative or psychotic conditions)2 are often balanced by reasons for living.3 If one can agree with the premise that a person who commits suicide might be sane, then despite the more humane trends to medicalize acts of deviance (allowing the person to be labelled sick instead of bad) society's interpretation of the act itself remains flawed: a symbol of the abnormal within. For Szasz, "to be or not to be" is not wholly a moral question nor one entirely brought on by sickness; its meaning is necessarily a question of values, human rights and responsibilities.

It may be easier for us to understand that someone's act of suicide was due to psychosis or depression rather than to understand it as an accumulation of life events and experiences that sanely caused him or her to believe death a less painful existence than life.

Szasz may have repackaged an old idea, but it is still one worth pondering.

References

  1. Links PS. An old idea repackaged. CMAJ 2000;163(3):313-4.[Free Full Text]
  2. Scocco P, Mariotta P, Toniotto M, Dello Brono M, De Leo D. The role of psychopathology and suicidal intention in predicting suicide risk: a longitudinal study. Psychopathology 2000;33 (3): 143-50.[Medline]
  3. Malone KM, Oquendo MA, Hass GL, Ellis SP, Li S, Mann JJ. Protective factors against suicide acts in major depression: reasons for living. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157(7):1084-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Latowsky, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Latowsky, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sociology
Right arrow Suicide