|



From *the Prevention and Rehabilitation Centre and
the Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ont.;
the Healthy Heart Program, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC; and
the Clinical Research Institute of Montreal, Montreal, Que.
Despite the steady decline in the rate of death from coronary artery disease (CAD) during the past 25 years, cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death in Canada, accounting for 37% of total deaths.1 Although the age-adjusted rate of death from cardiovascular disease is declining, the prevalence of cardiac conditions is increasing because of the growing number of elderly people, better acute care and improved survival.1 People with heart disease often remain in the community, requiring long-term medical care. In quantitative terms, $7.3 billion (17%) of total direct health care costs and $12.3 billion (14.5%) of total indirect health care costs for all disease categories can be attributed to cardiovascular disease.1
The largest proportion of cardiovascular diseases is represented by CAD and cerebral and peripheral vascular disease. During the past 3 decades efficacious strategies have been developed for primary and secondary prevention of these diseases. These strategies involve general lifestyle changes (to promote healthy diet, optimal weight, physical activity, moderate or no alcohol consumption, and smoking cessation), treatment of high blood pressure, control of diabetes mellitus and, in particular, treatment of dyslipidemias.
The causal relation between hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis was established more than 80 years ago by Anitschkow.2 Since the 1950s, there have been steady improvements in our ability to treat hypercholesterolemia through diet and the use of lipid-lowering drugs. The earliest angiographic and clinical studies demonstrated that intensive therapy to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels slowed the progression of atherosclerosis and decreased the incidence of major coronary events;3,4 however, these early studies did not have sufficient power to detect beneficial mortality trends. The results of these early clinical studies and the extensive epidemiological data on the relation between plasma lipoprotein levels and CAD, as well as experimental information from animal models of atherosclerosis, led to the development of policies to manage and treat lipid disorders. In Canada, guidelines for the management of hypercholesterolemia were first issued in 1988.5
Major clinical trials carried out over the past decade have shown a clear benefit of LDL-C reduction in terms of both CAD events and total mortality. A similar reduction in the relative risk of coronary events has been documented in patients with and without clinically evident CAD and in patients with mild or severe dyslipidemia.6-16 These advances necessitated a re-evaluation of diagnostic and treatment policies. In 1995 the Working Group on Hypercholesterolemia and Other Dyslipidemias was established at the initiative of Health Canada. Its first report was drafted in October 1996; after review by committee members, modifications were made and the next draft document was released in March 1997. The committee continued to work during the next 2 years, collecting information from Canadian health care providers and the scientific community. An interim report was published in April 1998.17 With the rapid progression of research in this area since then, a writing committee was convened to incorporate the most recent scientific data and expert opinion from various organizations and individuals into this new set of recommendations.
Recommendations
The following measures were recommended by the Working Group on Hypercholesterolemia and Other Dyslipidemias in light of the new scientific evidence that became available since the interim report was published. A summary of the changes in recommendations from the previous interim report appears in Table 1.
|
Routine screening
Routinely screen the following patients to obtain a fasting lipid profile (total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], triglyceride and calculated LDL-C levels): men over the age of 40; women over the age of 50; adults with 2 or more risk factors for CAD; patients with clinical evidence of CAD, peripheral vascular disease or carotid atherosclerosis (signs and symptoms of carotid vessel disease including bruits with transient ischemic attacks or carotid plaque visible by means of ultrasonography); patients with diabetes mellitus; patients with xanthomata or other stigmata of dyslipidemia; and patients with a family history of dyslipidemia or CAD.
Although there are no evidence-based recommendations regarding the optimal frequency for screening, it is reasonable to suggest that asymptomatic patients be screened every 5 years after the age of 40 for men and 50 for women. These ages have been chosen to initiate routine screening because they precede by about 5 years the accelerated rise in the incidence of clinically evident cardiovascular disease for men and women respectively. The frequency of repeat screening requires clinical judgement, but it is appropriate to repeat lipid measurements in patients who have acquired new risk factors or following lifestyle or pharmacological intervention.
Physical examination
Conduct a physical examination, with particular attention to evidence of cholesterol disorders (cutaneous eruptions, tendon xanthomas, arcus cornealis) and evidence of atherosclerosis (abdominal bruits, carotid bruits, diminished peripheral pulses, ankle-brachial index < 0.9).
Risk assessment
Patients with clinically evident atherosclerosis (i.e., CAD, peripheral vascular disease or carotid vascular disease including ischemic stroke) are categorized as being at very high risk for a cardiovascular event. Those with diabetes (fasting blood glucose level of 7.0 mmol/L or greater) who are over the age of 30 are classified as being at very high risk for CAD. For patients without clinical evidence of cardiovascular disease or diabetes, calculate their short-term risk level using the Framingham risk tables (Table 2).
|
Other predisposing risk factors contribute directly or indirectly to a high CAD risk. Lipoprotein(a) levels greater than 40 mg/dL increase CAD risk by as much as four-fold in patients with 2 or more other CAD risk factors or with a total cholesterol:HDL-C ratio greater than 5.8.19,20 A family history of CAD in any first-degree relative increases CAD risk, as does abdominal obesity (waist measurement greater than 100 cm in men and greater than 90 cm in women);21 a body mass index greater than 25;18,22 sedentary lifestyle (less than 20 minutes of vigorous exercise 3 times per week or less than 30 minutes per day of moderate exercise);23 postmenopausal status; ethnic background (absolute risk among South Asian people living in Western society appears to be twice that of white people, even when matched for major risk factors18).
Target lipid levels
Determine target lipid levels according to the patient's level of risk. An elevated LDL-C level is a major risk factor for CAD in both men and women. Recent clinical studies24-26 provide supporting evidence for LDL-C target levels of less than 2.5 mmol/L for the secondary prevention of CAD.27 Aggressive reduction of LDL-C levels has been shown to slow significantly the progression of atherosclerosis in grafts of patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery.25
Patients over the age of 30 who have diabetes are now classified as being at "very high risk" for CAD (CAD risk equivalent). The recent United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Group demonstrated that intensive blood glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes reduced the incidence of retinopathy and nephropathy but had less of an impact on CAD risk;28 therefore, lipid lowering and blood pressure control are major priorities for these high-risk patients. Haffner and colleagues29 showed that patients with diabetes without previous myocardial infarction were at as high a risk of coronary events as nondiabetic patients with previous myocardial infarction.
For all people classified as being at high risk (10-year calculated risk of CAD 20%-30%), the LDL-C target level has been decreased from 3.5 mmol/L to 3.0 mmol/L. Supportive evidence from the recent Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study demonstrated a 36% reduction in major coronary events among patients without CAD who were at moderately high risk and treated to achieve an LDL-C level below 3.0 mmol/L.16
In 1998 Wilson and associates30 published a simple coronary disease prediction algorithm to assist physicians in predicting multivariate CAD risk in patients without overt CAD. This particular prediction model, as well as the recently published global risk assessment scores,18 integrates continuous variables from prior CAD prediction models and categorical approaches, or various treatment guidelines, including the guidelines of the Working Group on Hypercholesterolemia and Other Dyslipidemias. Using these tables, a person's 10-year risk of symptomatic CAD can be estimated and lipid target levels determined (Tables 2 and 3). The calculated risk is based on information in available databases; however certain caveats apply. For instance, the risk prediction is relatively short term (10 years), and many patients at moderate short-term risk are at high long-term risk for CAD.31 The Framingham data do not apply to people with extreme or unusual risk factors such as severe familial hypercholesterolemia or those with very low levels of HDL-C (familial hypoalphalipoproteinemia). The impact of ethnic background and family history on CAD risk also requires further study. Finally, there are many emerging risk factors for CAD such as elevated levels of lipoprotein(a), fibrinogen, C-reactive protein and homocyst(e)ine that are likely to be incorporated into risk-calculation equations in the future.
|
All categorical risk factors should be treated, preferably by nonpharmacological means. Excess risk, accumulated over many years, cannot be eliminated by the introduction of intensive short-term prevention strategies.9,12,18,30,32-34 Although there are several medications that can significantly lower risk, they cannot reinstate the low-risk status of youth.
Secondary causes of hyperlipidemia
Identify and treat secondary causes of hyperlipidemia such as hypothyroidism, renal disease, diabetes and excessive alcohol intake, and assess whether medications taken by the patient are affecting lipid levels.
Therapy
The therapeutic strategy for patients with dyslipidemia depends on both the short-term (10-year) and long-term risk for CAD. For patients at very high or high risk, start drug therapy immediately and promote specific healthy lifestyle changes. For those at moderate risk, promote specific healthy lifestyle changes and, if target lipid levels are not achieved after 3 months, begin drug therapy. For patients at low risk, promote specific healthy lifestyle changes and, if target lipid levels are not reached after 6 months, begin drug therapy.
Recommend lifestyle changes. Specific healthy lifestyle recommendations with respect to diet, ideal body weight, physical activity, moderate alcohol consumption and smoking cessation are summarized in Table 4.
|
For drug therapy, the lipid-lowering drug of choice depends on the major lipid abnormality. Recommended drug therapies for the different types of lipid disorders are outlined in Table 5. A summary of currently used lipid-lowering medications is shown in Table 6.
|
|
Interpretation
Since the 1988 Canadian Consensus Conference on Cholesterol,5 there has been enormous progress in our understanding of the pathological basis of atherosclerosis and its complications. Over this same period, many large clinical trials have provided clear evidence that dyslipoproteinemia is a major treatable risk factor for CAD and that lowering LDL-C levels results in a prompt and significant decrease in cardiovascular events, including transient ischemic attacks and stroke. This is true for people at various levels of risk, with and without pre-existing CAD.37 Although identification and treatment of elevated LDL-C levels may be of benefit to many patients, the short-term benefit is clearly the greatest for people at highest risk for CAD. Thus, the most intensive interventions are advised for people with clinically evident cardiovascular disease or diabetes. These patients require an aggressive approach to reach LDL-C and total cholesterol:HDL-C ratio targets and to modify other risk factors.
Recent studies in Canada and the United States have shown that the majority of patients at very high risk for CAD do not achieve and maintain recommended target lipid levels. This failure is rarely accounted for by severe treatment-resistant dyslipidemia but more often by inadequate lifestyle and pharmacological interventions. Simple procedures such as standing orders for lipid measurement within 12 hours after admission to coronary care units and standard hospital or clinic discharge orders stipulating the appropriate lipid treatment for patients with cardiovascular disease and diabetes could be expected to have a major impact on standard of care. General recommendations for managing patients at high and very high risk include prompt intervention with both diet and medication, using an initial drug dose calculated to achieve the necessary reduction in LDL-C levels, and modification of the drug regimen as necessary to achieve and maintain target lipid levels. Inclusion of the patient in decision-making is essential, and a "know your LDL-C level" strategy is likely to improve long-term patient compliance.
For people without clinically evident cardiovascular disease or diabetes, the cost:benefit ratio of lipid-lowering therapy depends on their risk of cardiovascular disease; a comprehensive evaluation of short-term risk is advised using multiple risk-assessment equations such as those provided by the Framingham Heart Study. Although more time-consuming than counting risk factors, risk calculation has a number of advantages, including greater accuracy in the assignment of risk, especially for women. Risk calculation takes into account the relative contribution of individual risk factors to overall risk of cardiovascular disease, the severity of individual risk factors and the sex-specific relative risk. For example, the 10-year risk of a coronary event is much higher for a 55-year-old man with an LDL-C level of 4.5 mmol/L than for a 55-year-old woman with the same LDL-C level. However, a 55-year-old woman with an HDL-C level of 0.9 mmol/L has the same 10-year risk of a major coronary event as a 55-year-old man with a similar HDL-C concentration.38 Risk calculation also provides an opportunity for the physician to review modifiable risk factors with the patient and motivate the patient to make lifestyle changes that will reduce his or her overall risk.
Physicians must realize that this set of recommendations is a general guide and that clinical judgement is required. Many patients at low short-term risk are at high long-term risk for cardiovascular disease. Modifiable risk factors must be addressed at any age, and patients' risk factors should be reassessed periodically. Certain caveats apply to risk calculation. The major prospective population studies such as the Framingham Heart Study38 and the PROCAM Experience39 included a relatively small number of patients with severe dyslipidemias such as familial hypercholesterolemia. Adults with an LDL-C level greater than 5.0 mmol/L are at very high risk of CAD and, even in the absence of other CAD risk factors, are likely to require early pharmacological intervention. The accuracy and precision of risk calculation will continue to evolve. Future data sets are likely to include more detailed information on emerging CAD risk factors such as lipoprotein(a), fibrinogen, homocyst(e)ine, plasminogen activator inhibition-1 (PAI-1) and C-reactive protein; assessment of these factors may further improve the accuracy of risk assessment. Finally, noninvasive assessment of preclinical atherosclerosis, including exercise stress testing, nuclear perfusion scans and B-mode carotid ultrasonography, may aid in the early identification of patients at high risk for cardiovascular events.
The Working Group on Hypercholesterolemia and Other Dyslipidemias wishes to express its gratitude for the invaluable support of Health Canada during the development of these recommendations. In particular, the committee wishes to acknowledge the contribution of Dr. Arun Chockalingam.
Competing interests: The authors did not receive financial support from pharmaceutical companies for their work in developing these guidelines and producing this report. All have received speaker fees from various drug companies; Drs. Frohlich and Genest have been members of advisory boards of various drug companies; Drs. Fodor, Frohlich and Genest have received research grants from drug companies for work in this area; and Drs. Fodor, Frohlich and McPherson have received travel expenses from one or more drug companies to attend scientific meetings.
Acknowledgments
This electronic library provides evidence for informed health care decision-making in 4 databases: FIGURE
|
The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
The York Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness
The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register
The Cochrane Review Methodology Database $299.95/CMA members, $347.95/nonmembers. All orders must be prepaid. Please add 7% GST/HST (as applicable), 8% PST (Ontario residents only) and $4 shipping/handing. Please contact CMA Member Service Centre for network prices.
Available on CD-ROM only.
CMA Member Service Centre; tel 888 855-2555 or 613 731-8610 x2307; cmamsc{at}cma.ca
Footnotes
¶The list of working group members appears at the end of the article.
This article has been peer reviewed.
Reprint requests to: Dr. G. Fodor, Heart Check, Prevention and Rehabilitation Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Ave., Ottawa ON K1Y 4W7; fax 613 761-5309; gfodor{at}ottawaheart.ca
Working Group on Hypercholesterolemia and Other Dyslipidemias: Drs. George Fodor (chair), Prevention and Rehabilitation Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ont.; Joyce Beare-Rogers, Nepean, Ont.; Kenneth Carroll, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont.; Veronique Dery, Public Health Directorate of Montreal, Montreal, Que.; Darlene M.S. Hammell, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Jiri Frohlich, Healthy Heart Program, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC; Jacques Genest, Jr., Clinical Research Institute of Montreal, Montreal, Que.; John J. Horvath, Population Health Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ont.; John Klassen, Director, Plasmapheresis Program, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alta.; Neima Langner, NRL Research, Nepean, Ont.; Marielle Ledoux, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Que.; J. Alick Little, Nobel, Ont.; Paul J. Lupien, Director, Centre de recherche sur les maladies lipidiques, Centre hospitalier de l'Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, Que.; David R. MacLean, Head, Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Clinical Research Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; J. Stewart McMillan, Regina, Sask.; Ruth McPherson, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ont.; W. Phillip Mickelson, Preventive Health Services Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ont.; Andres Petrasovits, Chief, Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Unit, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ont.; Meng H. Tan, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, I Ialifax, NS; Andrew C. Watson, Medical Consultant, Maritime Medical Care Centre, Halifax, NS; Shinji Yokoyama, Heritage Medical Research Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. L. Chan, K. Teo, J. G. Dumesnil, A. Ni, J. Tam, and for the ASTRONOMER Investigators Effect of Lipid Lowering With Rosuvastatin on Progression of Aortic Stenosis: Results of the Aortic Stenosis Progression Observation: Measuring Effects of Rosuvastatin (ASTRONOMER) Trial Circulation, January 19, 2010; 121(2): 306 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Saposnik, S. G. Goodman, L. A. Leiter, R. T. Yan, D. H. Fitchett, N. H. Bayer, A. Casanova, A. Langer, A. T. Yan, for the Vascular Protection (VP), et al. Applying the Evidence: Do Patients With Stroke, Coronary Artery Disease, or Both Achieve Similar Treatment Goals? Stroke, April 1, 2009; 40(4): 1417 - 1424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. NIKPOUR, D. D. GLADMAN, D. IBANEZ, I. N. BRUCE, R. J. BURNS, and M. B. UROWITZ Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Assessing Risk of Coronary Events in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus J Rheumatol, February 1, 2009; 36(2): 288 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Grover, I. Lowensteyn, L. Joseph, M. Kaouache, S. Marchand, L. Coupal, G. Boudreau, and for the Cardiovascular Health Evaluation to Improv Patient Knowledge of Coronary Risk Profile Improves the Effectiveness of Dyslipidemia Therapy: The CHECK-UP Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial Arch Intern Med, November 26, 2007; 167(21): 2296 - 2303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Lipson, W. M. Fallis, X. Wang, and Y. Yi Are patients with hyperlipidemia undertreated?: Study of patients admitted to hospital with coronary events Can Fam Physician, September 1, 2007; 53(9): 1502 - 1507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.B. Urowitz, D. Gladman, D. Ibanez, P. Fortin, J. Sanchez-Guerrero, S. Bae, A. Clarke, S. Bernatsky, C. Gordon, J. Hanly, et al. Clinical manifestations and coronary artery disease risk factors at diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus: data from an international inception cohort Lupus, September 1, 2007; 16(9): 731 - 735. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Bell, J. Bajcar, A. S. Bierman, P. Li, M. M. Mamdani, and D. R. Urbach Potentially Unintended Discontinuation of Long-term Medication Use After Elective Surgical Procedures Arch Intern Med, December 11, 2006; 166(22): 2525 - 2531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Lok, M. Allon, L. Moist, M. J. Oliver, H. Shah, and D. Zimmerman Risk Equation Determining Unsuccessful Cannulation Events and Failure to Maturation in Arteriovenous Fistulas (REDUCE FTM I) J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2006; 17(11): 3204 - 3212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Tobe, G. Pylypchuk, J. Wentworth, A. Kiss, J. P. Szalai, N. Perkins, S. Hartman, L. Ironstand, and J. Hoppe Effect of nurse-directed hypertension treatment among First Nations people with existing hypertension and diabetes mellitus: the Diabetes Risk Evaluation and Microalbuminuria (DREAM 3) randomized controlled trial Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 25, 2006; 174(9): 1267 - 1271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Charrois, J. A. Johnson, S. Blitz, and R. T. Tsuyuki Relationship between number, timing, and type of pharmacist interventions and patient outcomes Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., September 1, 2005; 62(17): 1798 - 1801. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Manuel, P. Tanuseputro, C. A. Mustard, S. E. Schultz, G. M. Anderson, S. Ardal, D. A. Alter, and A. Laupacis The 2003 Canadian recommendations for dyslipidemia management: Revisions are needed Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 12, 2005; 172(8): 1027 - 1031. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. von Birgelen, M. Hartmann, G. S. Mintz, K. G. van Houwelingen, N. Deppermann, A. Schmermund, D. Bose, H. Eggebrecht, T. Neumann, M. Gossl, et al. Relationship Between Cardiovascular Risk as Predicted by Established Risk Scores Versus Plaque Progression as Measured by Serial Intravascular Ultrasound in Left Main Coronary Arteries Circulation, September 21, 2004; 110(12): 1579 - 1585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Montessori, N. Press, M. Harris, L. Akagi, and J. S.G. Montaner Adverse effects of antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 20, 2004; 170(2): 229 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Brindle, J. Emberson, F. Lampe, M. Walker, P. Whincup, T. Fahey, and S. Ebrahim Predictive accuracy of the Framingham coronary risk score in British men: prospective cohort study BMJ, November 29, 2003; 327(7426): 1267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Genest, J. Frohlich, G. Fodor, and R. McPherson Recommendations for the management of dyslipidemia and the prevention of cardiovascular disease: summary of the 2003 update Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 28, 2003; 169(9): 921 - 924. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Couillard, M.-C. Vohl, J. C. Engert, I. Lemieux, A. Houde, N. Almeras, D. Prud'homme, A. Nadeau, J.-P. Despres, and J. Bergeron Effect of apoC-III gene polymorphisms on the lipoprotein-lipid profile of viscerally obese men J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2003; 44(5): 986 - 993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Genest and T. R. Pedersen Prevention of Cardiovascular Ischemic Events: High-Risk and Secondary Prevention Circulation, April 22, 2003; 107(15): 2059 - 2065. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D Feher Lipid lowering to delay the progression of coronary artery disease Heart, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 451 - 458. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Beauchesne-Rondeau, A. Gascon, J. Bergeron, and H. Jacques Plasma lipids and lipoproteins in hypercholesterolemic men fed a lipid-lowering diet containing lean beef, lean fish, or poultry Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2003; 77(3): 587 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
References Circulation, December 17, 2002; 106(25): 3373 - 3421. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Fung and J. J. Frohlich Common problems in the management of hypertriglyceridemia Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 26, 2002; 167(11): 1261 - 1266. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M H Moghadasian, J J Frohlich, and C H Scudamore Specificity of the commonly used enzymatic assay for plasma cholesterol determination J. Clin. Pathol., November 1, 2002; 55(11): 859 - 861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Tobe, P. A. McFarlane, and D. M. Naimark Microalbuminuria in diabetes mellitus Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 1, 2002; 167(5): 499 - 503. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Jackevicius, M. Mamdani, and J. V. Tu Adherence With Statin Therapy in Elderly Patients With and Without Acute Coronary Syndromes JAMA, July 24, 2002; 288(4): 462 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Miremadi, A. Sniderman, and J. Frohlich Can Measurement of Serum Apolipoprotein B Replace the Lipid Profile Monitoring of Patients with Lipoprotein Disorders? Clin. Chem., March 1, 2002; 48(3): 484 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Lemieux, B. Lamarche, C. Couillard, A. Pascot, B. Cantin, J. Bergeron, G. R. Dagenais, and J.-P. Despres Total Cholesterol/HDL Cholesterol Ratio vs LDL Cholesterol/HDL Cholesterol Ratio as Indices of Ischemic Heart Disease Risk in Men: The Quebec Cardiovascular Study Arch Intern Med, December 10, 2001; 161(22): 2685 - 2692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-P. Despres, I. Lemieux, G. R. Dagenais, B. Cantin, and B. Lamarche Evaluation and management of atherogenic dyslipidemia: beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 1, 2001; 165(10): 1331 - 1333. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Jenkins, C. W. Kendall, E. Vidgen, L. S. Augustin, M. van Erk, A. Geelen, T. Parker, D. Faulkner, V. Vuksan, R. G Josse, et al. High-protein diets in hyperlipidemia: effect of wheat gluten on serum lipids, uric acid, and renal function Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2001; 74(1): 57 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Couillard, J.-P. Despres, B. Lamarche, J. Bergeron, J. Gagnon, A. S. Leon, D. C. Rao, J. S. Skinner, J. H. Wilmore, and C. Bouchard Effects of Endurance Exercise Training on Plasma HDL Cholesterol Levels Depend on Levels of Triglycerides : Evidence From Men of the Health, Risk Factors, Exercise Training and Genetics (HERITAGE) Family Study Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, July 1, 2001; 21(7): 1226 - 1232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pascot, J.-P. Després, I. Lemieux, N. Alméras, J. Bergeron, A. Nadeau, D. Prudhomme, A. Tremblay, and S. Lemieux Deterioration of the Metabolic Risk Profile in Women: Respective contributions of impaired glucose tolerance and visceral fat accumulation Diabetes Care, May 1, 2001; 24(5): 902 - 908. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Grover, M. Dorais, G. Paradis, J. G. Fodor, J. J. Frohlich, R. McPherson, L. Coupal, and H. Zowall Lipid screening to prevent coronary artery disease: a quantitative evaluation of evolving guidelines Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 1, 2000; 163(10): 1263 - 1269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||