This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chouinard, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chouinard, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Quality improvement
Right arrow Long-term care
CMAJ • July 27, 1999; 161 (2)
© 1999 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors


Letters
Correspondance

Quality control in nursing homes

Jean A. Chouinard, MD

Sisters of Charity at Ottawa Health Service; Ottawa, Ont.

[The author responds:]

John Hirdes' thoughtful comments deserve clarification. The epistemology of health outcomes in institutions is as yet poorly defined, although we generally agree on what should not happen to nursing home patients. What is surprising is the lack of empirical data supporting the effectiveness of interventions for common clinical problems, [1,2] although fortunately this is changing. [3] Can the MDS help in this regard? It does provide standardized, risk-adjusted outcome data that can be used to compare facilities and specific patient subgroups. However, it does not further quality or quantify the interventions being carried out on each patient, nor does it support prognostication even at a crude level. Therein lies the problem. The mere existence of a care process does not ipso facto lend support to its effectiveness.

The MDS provides a sound, validated, systematic approach to care planning, costing and outcome evaluation. It should be broadly implemented not only in chronic care facilities but in home care, nursing home and ambulatory care settings. It is, however, only part of the answer. Formal research is needed to improve clinical care in these settings. Methinks inferences on the effectiveness of specific interventions on the basis of MDS data smack uncomfortably of deus ex machina.

Jean A. Chouinard, MD

Sisters of Charity at Ottawa Health Service; Ottawa, Ont.

References

  1. Finucane TE. Malnutrition, tube feeding and pressure sores: data are incomplete. J Am Geriatr Soc1995;43:447-51.[Medline]
  2. Fabiny AR, Kiel DP. Assessing and treating weight loss in nursing home residents. Clin Geriatr Med1997;13:737-51.[Medline]
  3. Ray WA, Taylor JA, Meador KG, Thapa PB, Brown AK, Kajihara HK, et al. A randomized trial of a consultation service to reduce falls in nursing homes. JAMA1997;278:557-62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chouinard, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chouinard, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Quality improvement
Right arrow Long-term care