This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tu, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Austin, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tu, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Austin, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Vascular surgery
Right arrow Ischemic heart disease
Right arrow Other epidemiology
Right arrow Cardiothoracic surgery
CMAJ • November 16, 1999; 161 (10)
© 1999 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors


Evidence
Études

Temporal changes in the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in Ontario, 1992-1996

Jack V. Tu, MD, PhD*{dagger}{ddagger}, C. David Naylor, MD, DPhil*{dagger}{ddagger} and Peter Austin, PhD*§

From *the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; {dagger}the Division of General Internal Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology Unit and Health Care Research Program, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre; {ddagger}the Departments of Medicine and Public Health Sciences, and §the Department of Public Health Sciences, the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.

Abstract

Background: There is relatively little information available on recent population-based trends in the outcomes of patients who have had an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We, therefore, conducted a study of temporal trends in the outcomes of AMI patients in Ontario, Canada, between the 1992 and 1996 fiscal years.

Methods: 114 618 AMI patients were discharged from hospitals in Ontario between Apr. 1, 1992, and Mar. 31, 1997. After specific exclusion criteria were applied the final sample of 89 456 patients was divided into 5 cohorts according to the fiscal year of discharge. As part of the Ontario Myocardial Infarction Database project the linked administrative data pertaining to these patients were used to examine cohort characteristics, cardiac procedures used and mortality rates for each of the 5 cohorts over time.

Results: There was a significant increase in the percentage of patients in Ontario receiving coronary angiography, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (p < 0.001) after an AMI between 1992 and 1996. In addition, the overall 30-day risk-adjusted mortality rate declined from 15.5% in 1992 to 14.0% in 1996 (p = 0.001) and the 1-year risk-adjusted mortality rate declined from 23.7% in 1992 to 22.3% in 1996 (p = 0.017). Virtually all of the improvement occurred within 30 days of admission. The absolute decline in 1-year mortality rates was significant for patients under the age of 65 (2.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4% to 3.2%) and for males (1.2%, 95% CI 0.2% to 2.2%); absolute declines were not significant for patients 65 years of age or older (0.7%, 95% CI-0.6% to 2.0%) and for female patients (-0.1%, 95% CI -1.7% to 1.5%). Interestingly, post-infarction coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass grafting rates were consistently lower in the older and the female patients throughout the study period.

Interpretation: There was a modest improvement in the short- and long-term survival of patients in Ontario after an AMI between 1992 and 1996. The Ontario experience suggests that recent advances in AMI management have been of more benefit to younger and male AMI patients.


Despite multiple therapeutic advances in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) over the past 2 decades (e.g., thrombolytics, ß-blockers, aspirin, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors) AMI continues to be a leading cause of death throughout the industrialized world. Population-based studies published in the 1980s reported significant improvements in short- and long-term survival rates after an AMI. For instance, the 30-day AMI mortality rate of elderly patients on Medicare in the United States declined from 26% in 1987 to 23% in 1990, and the 1-year mortality rate declined from 40% in 1987 to 36% in 1990.1 There is relatively little information available on population-based trends in short-and long-term survival after an AMI in the 1990s, however.

To evaluate these and other trends our group initiated the Ontario Myocardial Infarction Database (OMID) project in 1998. All of Ontario's major health care administrative databases were linked, and the resulting comprehensive AMI database is being used to study the quality of AMI care in Ontario. The database contains information on patient demographics, comorbidities, cardiac procedures used, hospital admissions, physician visits, drug utilization (for elderly patients only) and vital status. In this study, we examined temporal trends in patient outcomes after an AMI in Ontario, Canada, between the 1992 and 1996 fiscal years and were thus able to evaluate whether recent advances in AMI management have led to improved patient outcomes and whether they have been of equal benefit to all patient subgroups.

Methods

We obtained hospital discharge data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) administrative database for all patients discharged from an acute care hospital in Ontario with a most responsible diagnosis (that which accounted for most of the patient's stay) of an AMI (International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision code 410) between Apr. 1, 1992 and Mar. 31, 1997. The CIHI database contains patient demographic, comorbidity, procedure and mortality information on all patients discharged from hospitals in Ontario. We linked these data using unique anonymized patient identifiers (i.e., scrambled Ontario health card numbers that are unique to each individual and recorded in all of the databases) to the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) physician billing database and the Ontario Registered Persons Database (RPDB). Each of these databases has electronic safeguards for validating health card numbers.

The OHIP database contains information on all fee-for-service physician claims in the Ontario health care system including claims for coronary angiography, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. The Ontario Registered Persons Database contains information on the vital status of all Ontario residents covered under the Ontario health insurance plan. Deaths that might not have been recorded in this database were determined by searching the CIHI database for any subsequent hospital admissions associated with death. The accuracy of the mortality data was validated by linking the AMI data directly to provincial vital statistics data at Cancer Care Ontario (agreement = 99.6%).

Overall, 114 618 patients 20 years of age or older were discharged from an acute care hospital in Ontario between Apr. 1, 1992, and Mar. 31, 1997, with a most responsible diagnosis of an AMI. Previous multicentre audits of AMI coding accuracy in Ontario's CIHI database revealed a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 88% for the coding of a most responsible diagnosis of AMI.2 To improve the specificity for an AMI diagnosis a series of exclusion criteria was applied to the original cohort before dividing the population into yearly cohorts. Patients discharged with a total length of stay of less than 3 days (3.8% of the original cohort), including days at a receiving hospital if they were transferred, were excluded under the assumption that these patients had "ruled-out" AMIs rather than true AMIs. We also excluded the admissions of patients who were readmitted to hospital with an AMI in the past year (6.1% of the original cohort) and those transfered from another acute care institution (5.5%) to avoid counting patients twice. Only the first (i.e., index) admission for a transfer patient was included in our cohort. Patients who were not Ontario residents (1.8%), had an invalid health card number (1.9%), who were initially admitted to a noncardiac surgical service (0.5%) or who had an AMI as a complication after admission to hospital (2.4%) were also excluded. Thus, 22% of the original cohort was excluded, leaving a total of 89 456 patients to be included in our study. Based on the fiscal year of each patient's discharge (Apr. 1 of a calendar year to Mar. 31 of the next year) 5 yearly cohorts (1992 to 1996) were created from the remaining patient population.

To further establish the accuracy of AMI coding in our cohorts, we sent the 196 acute care hospitals in Ontario a list of the AMI patients with our inclusion-exclusion decisions so that they could independently validate the accuracy of the AMI diagnosis; 70% of the hospitals responded. Most hospitals validated a random sample of 50-100 AMI patients, but some validated all of their charts. All but 1 of these hospitals indicated that the true diagnosis was AMI in 94% or more of their patients; many hospitals reported 100% accuracy.

Data on the use of coronary angiography, PTCA, and CABG surgery were obtained from both the OHIP and CIHI databases and were cross-validated (agreement was 99.4% for PTCA and 99.9% for CABG). Nine patient comorbidities were determined using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, codes contained in the 15 secondary diagnosis fields in the CIHI database.3 The comorbidities chosen are included in the Ontario AMI mortality prediction rule, a logistic regression model developed by our group with the fiscal 1994-1996 OMID cohort to predict mortality after an AMI.4 Only the comorbidities present at hospital admission were included in the model. The area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve of this model was 0.78 for 30-day mortality and 0.79 for 1-year mortality, indicating very good predictive performance.5

Temporal changes in patient demographics and comorbidities, cardiac procedure rates and mortality rates were analyzed using a {chi}2 test for trend. Temporal changes in continuous variables (e.g., length of stay) were assessed using linear regression. Age-adjusted relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cardiac procedures and mortality among women (compared with men) were calculated using standard epidemiological methods.5 Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed and were compared using a log-rank statistic to determine age- and sex-specific changes in mortality in specific subgroups between 1992 and 1996.

Trends in the 30-day and 1-year risk-adjusted mortality rates between 1992 and 1996 were calculated by dividing the crude mortality rate by the expected mortality rate for each year and then multiplying the value by the average mortality rate over the 5-year study period. The expected mortality rates were determined by applying a logistic regression model with age, female sex, and the 9 comorbidities in the Ontario AMI mortality prediction rule.4

Results

The demographic and comorbidity characteristics of the 89 456 patients who met the inclusion-exclusion criteria and were divided into 5 cohorts are shown in Table 1. There was an overall trend toward an increasing proportion of older (65 years of age and older) AMI patients in Ontario, but the proportions of most patient comorbidities were relatively stable between 1992 and 1996. The average length of stay for AMI patients in Ontario decreased from a mean (median) of 9.5 (8) days in 1992 to 8.2 (7) days in 1996 (p < 0.001 for both comparisons, data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1: Demographic characteristics of the acute myocardial infarction (AMI) cohorts, 1992-1996

 

Temporal changes in the 1-year rates of use of cardiac procedures post-MI are shown in Table 2. These data show a significant increase in the proportion of patients receiving coronary angiography, PTCA and CABG surgery (p < 0.001) after an AMI between 1992 and 1996. Although the absolute rate increases were similar for patients under 65 and those 65 years of age or older, the rates of cardiac procedure use were consistently lower for the older patient groups. The lower rate of procedure use among women was partially accounted for by their older age at presentation. After adjusting for age differences, women had consistently lower relative risks of receiving coronary angiography at 1-year (0.85 RR in 1992 [95% CI 0.79 to 0.91] v. 0.94 in 1996 [95% CI 0.89 to 1.00]) and CABG surgery (0.71 RR in 1992 [95% CI 0.62 to 0.81] v. 0.76 in 1996 [95% CI 0.68 to 0.85]) but a similar risk of receiving PTCA (RR 1.11 in 1992 [95% CI 0.97 to 1.28] v. 1.01 in 1996 [95% CI 0.90 to 1.14]).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2: Age- and sex-specific 1-year rates of use of cardiac procedures in acute myocardial infarction patients in Ontario*

 

The temporal trends in 30-day and 1-year mortality rates after an AMI are shown in Table 3. There was a gradual decline in the 30-day overall risk-adjusted mortality rate from 15.5% in 1992 to 14.0% in 1996 (p = 0.001) and in the 1-year overall risk-adjusted mortality rate from 23.7% in 1992 to 22.3% in 1996 (p = 0.017). Virtually all of the improvement in 1-year survival occurred within 30 days of the AMI. The absolute decline in 1-year mortality rates was significant for patients younger than 65 (2.3%, 95% CI 1.4% to 3.2%) and for males (1.2%, 95% CI 0.2% to 2.2%), but was not significant for the older patients (>= 65 years of age, 0.7%, 95% CI -0.6% to 2.0%) and for female patients (-0.1%, 95% CI -1.7% to 1.5%). Significant improvements were observed in the 1-year survival curves for patients younger than 65 years (p < 0.001) and male (p = 0.014) but not for patients aged 65 and over (p = 0.149) and female (p = 0.934) (Fig. 1). After adjusting for differences in age the RRs for mortality among women continued to be higher than those among men (30-day RR of 1.16 in 1992 [95% CI 1.07 to 1.26] v. 1.18 in 1996 [95% CI 1.09 to 1.28] and 1-year RR of 1.09 in 1992 [95% CI 1.02 to 1.17] v. 1.15 in 1996 [95% CI 1.08 to 1.22]).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3: Age-specific, sex-specific and risk-adjusted mortality rates in AMI patients in Ontario

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1: Upper panel: crude 1-year survival curves of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients younger than 65 years of age and 65 years of age or older in Ontario, 1992 and 1996. Lower panel: crude 1-year survival curves for male and female AMI patients in Ontario, 1992 and 1996.

 

Interpretation

The goal of this study was to evaluate temporal changes in the outcomes of care in a large population-based cohort of AMI patients in Ontario between 1992 and 1996. We observed a modest improvement in both 30-day and 1-year survival after an AMI during this period, primarily in younger and male patients. Virtually all of the improvement occurred within 30 days of the AMI, with little change observed beyond that time. Although the generalizability of our findings is uncertain at this time, this study suggests that recent advances in AMI management have predominantly benefited younger and male AMI patients; for reasons yet to be determined, significant long-term mortality declines were not observed among the older patients or the female patients.

Our study builds upon a number of previous studies that examined temporal trends in outcomes of AMI patients. The results of these studies were limited, however, because they focused on changes that occurred in an earlier time-frame,1,6,7 or only in selected communities, they only included data on inhospital mortality6,7 or did not consider patients of all ages groups.1,7,8 Our data suggest that the decline in mortality rates for AMI patients in the 1990s has slowed in comparison with declines reported for the late 1980s. For example, data from the Minnesota Heart Survey indicated a 3% absolute improvement in 30-day mortality and an absolute improvement of 6% among men and 5% among women in 3-year mortality between 1985 and 1990; these improvements also coincided with large increases in the use of aspirin and thrombolytic drugs.8

Our analyses revealed a more modest decline between 1992 and 1996 in 30-day mortality rates after an AMI. Assuming that aspirin and thrombolytics were commonly used in Ontario in the early 1990s, the declines in our study might reflect a further increase in the use of these and other beneficial therapeutic agents (e.g., ß-blockers and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors), a decrease in the use of harmful agents (e.g, calcium-channel blockers and antiarrythmics), a decline in AMI severity, earlier hospital admissions or a combination of these factors. Additional studies involving detailed chart review are required to elucidate the relative contribution of each of these factors.

The lack of significant improvement in long-term mortality in the older and female patient groups may be attributable to several factors. These patient groups have historically been under-represented in clinical trials,9 and questions have been raised about whether they experience the same benefits from new AMI therapies as younger and male patient groups.10 Although we did not have data on inhospital medications, other investigators have shown that older and female patients are much less likely to receive thrombolytics, aspirin and ß-blockers for an AMI;11-13 they also tend to arrive at the hospital later and have more atypical AMI presentations, thereby restricting their eligibility for acute therapies such as thrombolytics.14,15 Although the analyses are not conclusive, there is also some data to suggest that aspirin and thrombolytics may be less effective in female patients.10

Our study has certain limitations as well. Because we did not have detailed information on the inhospital management of these AMI patients we could not make definitive conclusions about why mortality declined and why the decline was more evident in the younger and male patient groups. The generalizability of our findings to jurisdictions outside Ontario remains to be determined, but short- and long-term outcomes among elderly AMI patients in Ontario and the United States in 1991 were found to be similar.16

Conclusions

Analyses of ongoing population-based trends in AMI outcomes using administrative databases are important for evaluating the impact of recent advances in AMI treatment on patient outcomes in the community setting. We found a modest improvement in short- and long-term survival after an AMI in Ontario between 1992 and 1996. Although we cannot be certain about all of the factors responsible for these changes, the greater improvements found in younger and male patients suggest that recent advances in AMI management have not been of equal benefit to all subgroups. Further studies are required to determine if a differential use of the existing AMI therapies across population subgroups might explain these data.

We thank Drs. Carl van Walraven and Mark Cheung for helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. We also thank Hua Zhang for programming assistance and Francine Duquette for assistance in preparing the tables.

Dr. Tu is a Medical Research Council (MRC) of Canada Scholar. Dr. Naylor is an MRC Senior Scientist. This work was supported in part by an operating grant MA-14671 from the Medical Research Council of Canada and a University of Toronto New Staff Matching Grant. The results and conclusions are strictly those of the authors and should not be attributed to any of the sponsoring agencies.

Competing interests: None declared.

Footnotes

This article has been peer reviewed.

Reprint requests to: Dr. Jack V. Tu, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, G106-2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto ON M4N 3M5; fax 416 480-6048


References

  1. Pashos CL, Newhouse JP, McNeil BJ. Temporal changes in the care and outcomes of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction, 1987 through 1990. JAMA 1993;270:1832-6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Cox JL, Melady MP, Chen E, Naylor CD. Towards improved coding of acute myocardial infarction in hospital discharge abstracts: a pilot project. Can J Cardiol 1997;13:351-8.[Medline]
  3. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:613-9.[Medline]
  4. Tu JV, Austin P, Naylor CD, Iron K, Zhang H. Acute myocardial infarction outcomes in Ontario. In: Naylor CD, Slaughter P, editors. Cardiovascular health and services in Ontario: an ICES atlas. 1st ed. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 1999. p. 83-110.
  5. Rosner BA. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 4th ed. Belmont (CA): Duxbury Press; 1995.
  6. Naylor CD, Chen E. Population-wide mortality trends among patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction: the Ontario experience, 1981 to 1991. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:1431-7.[Abstract]
  7. Brown N, Young T, Gray D, Skene AM, Hampton JR. Inpatient deaths from acute myocardial infarction, 1982-92: analysis of data in the Nottingham Heart Attack Register. BMJ 1997;315:159-64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. McGovern PG, Pankow JS, Shahar E, Doliszny KM, Folsom AR, Blackburn H, et al. Recent trends in acute coronary heart disease: mortality, morbidity, medical care, and risk factors. N Engl J Med 1996;334:884-90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Gurwitz JH, Col NF, Avorn J. The exclusion of the elderly and women from clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 1992;268:1417-22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Nohria A, Vaccarino V, Krumholz HM. Gender differences in mortality after myocardial infarction. Why women fare worse than men. Cardiol Clin 1998;16:45-57.[Medline]
  11. Chandra NC, Ziegelstein RC, Rogers WJ, Tiefenbrunn AJ, Gore JM, French WJ, et al. Observations of the treatment of women in the United States with myocardial infarction: a report from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-1. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:981-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Rogers WJ, Bowlby LJ, Chandra NC, French WJ, Gore JM, Lambrew CT, et al. Treatment of myocardial infarction in the United States (1990 to 1993): observations from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 1994;90:2103-14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Chandra NC, Yarzebski J, Goldberg RJ, Savageau J, Singleton C, Gurwitz JH, et al. Age-related trends (1986-1993) in the use of thrombolytic agents in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:741-6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Lambrew CT, Bowlby LJ, Rogers WJ, Chandra NC, Weaver WD. Factors influencing the time to thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Time to Thrombolysis Substudy of the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-1. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:2577-82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Marrugat J, Sala J, Masia R, Pavesi M, Sanz G, Valle V, et al. Mortality differences between men and women following first myocardial infarction. RESCATE Investigators. JAMA 1998;280:1405-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Tu JV, Pashos CL, Naylor CD, Chen E, Normand S-LT, Newhouse JP, et al. Use of cardiac procedures and outcomes in elderly patients with myocardial infarction in the United States and Canada. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1500-5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CMAJHome page
P. C. Austin PhD, J. V. Tu MD PhD, D. T. Ko MD MSc, and D. A. Alter MD PhD
Use of evidence-based therapies after discharge among elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction
Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 21, 2008; 179(9): 895 - 900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
P. C. Austin PhD, J. V. Tu MD PhD, D. T. Ko MD MSc, and D. A. Alter MD PhD
Factors associated with the use of evidence-based therapies after discharge among elderly patients with myocardial infarction
Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 21, 2008; 179(9): 901 - 908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
L. Pilote MD PhD, M. Abrahamowicz PhD, M. Eisenberg MD MPH, K. Humphries DSc, H. Behlouli MSc PhD, and J. V. Tu MD PhD
Effect of different angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors on mortality among elderly patients with congestive heart failure
Can. Med. Assoc. J., May 6, 2008; 178(10): 1303 - 1311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Setoguchi, R. J. Glynn, J. Avorn, M. A. Mittleman, R. Levin, and W. C. Winkelmayer
Improvements in Long-Term Mortality After Myocardial Infarction and Increased Use of Cardiovascular Drugs After Discharge: A 10-Year Trend Analysis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2008; 51(13): 1247 - 1254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
W. E. Boden and D. J. Maron
Reducing Post-Myocardial Infarction Mortality in the Elderly: The Power and Promise of Secondary Prevention
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2008; 51(13): 1255 - 1257.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
C. van Walraven, N. Oake, P. S. Wells, and A. J. Forster
Burden of Potentially Avoidable Anticoagulant-Associated Hemorrhagic and Thromobembolic Events in the Elderly
Chest, May 1, 2007; 131(5): 1508 - 1515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. M. Singh, P. C. Austin, A. Chong, and D. A. Alter
Coronary Angiography Following Acute Myocardial Infarction in Ontario, Canada
Arch Intern Med, April 23, 2007; 167(8): 808 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
B. R. Hemmelgarn, B. J. Manns, J. Zhang, M. Tonelli, S. Klarenbach, M. Walsh, B. F. Culleton, and for the Alberta Kidney Disease Network
Association between Multidisciplinary Care and Survival for Elderly Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2007; 18(3): 993 - 999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
B. F. Culleton, B. J. Manns, J. Zhang, M. Tonelli, S. Klarenbach, and B. R. Hemmelgarn
Impact of anemia on hospitalization and mortality in older adults
Blood, May 15, 2006; 107(10): 3841 - 3846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
G. L. Booth, M. K. Kapral, K. Fung, and J. V. Tu
Recent Trends in Cardiovascular Complications Among Men and Women With and Without Diabetes
Diabetes Care, January 1, 2006; 29(1): 32 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
S P Johnsen, J Videbaek, L Pedersen, R Steffensen, R Videbaek, T Niemann, T T Nielsen, and H T Sorensen
Survival trends among Danish patients undergoing coronary angiography for known or suspected ischaemic heart disease: a population based follow up study, 1992-2000
Heart, January 1, 2006; 92(1): 27 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
Z. Zhou, E. Rahme, M. Abrahamowicz, J. V. Tu, M. J. Eisenberg, K. Humphries, P. C. Austin, and L. Pilote
Effectiveness of statins for secondary prevention in elderly patients after acute myocardial infarction: an evaluation of class effect
Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 26, 2005; 172(9): 1187 - 1194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
D. T. Ko, P. C. Austin, B. T. B. Chan, and J. V. Tu
Quality of Care of International and Canadian Medical Graduates in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Arch Intern Med, February 28, 2005; 165(4): 458 - 463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. T. Ko, M. Mamdani, and D. A. Alter
Lipid-Lowering Therapy With Statins in High-Risk Elderly Patients: The Treatment-Risk Paradox
JAMA, April 21, 2004; 291(15): 1864 - 1870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
W.-C. Chang, P. Kaul, C. M. Westerhout, M. M. Graham, Y. Fu, T. Chowdhury, and P. W. Armstrong
Impact of Sex on Long-term Mortality From Acute Myocardial Infarction vs Unstable Angina
Arch Intern Med, November 10, 2003; 163(20): 2476 - 2484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
J. V. TU and C. CAMERON
Impact of an acute myocardial infarction report card in Ontario, Canada
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, March 1, 2003; 15(2): 131 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
D. A. Alter, C. D. Naylor, P. C. Austin, B. T.B. Chan, and J. V. Tu
Geography and service supply do not explain socioeconomic gradients in angiography use after acute myocardial infarction
Can. Med. Assoc. J., February 4, 2003; 168(3): 261 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. A. Alter, C. D. Naylor, P. C. Austin, and J. V. Tu
Biology or bias: practice patterns and long-term outcomes for men and women with acute myocardial infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 19, 2002; 39(12): 1909 - 1916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
P. C. Austin
A Comparison of Bayesian Methods for Profiling Hospital Performance
Med Decis Making, April 1, 2002; 22(2): 163 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. V. Tu, P. C. Austin, and B. T. B. Chan
Relationship Between Annual Volume of Patients Treated by Admitting Physician and Mortality After Acute Myocardial Infarction
JAMA, June 27, 2001; 285(24): 3116 - 3122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. A. Alter, C. D. Naylor, P. C. Austin, and J. V. Tu
Long-term MI Outcomes at Hospitals With or Without On-site Revascularization
JAMA, April 25, 2001; 285(16): 2101 - 2108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. V. Tu, P. C. Austin, R. Walld, L. Roos, J. Agras, and K. M. McDonald
Development and validation of the ontario acute myocardial infarction mortality prediction rules
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 15, 2001; 37(4): 992 - 997.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C. A. Jackevicius, G. M. Anderson, L. Leiter, and J. V. Tu
Use of the Statins in Patients After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Does Evidence Change Practice?
Arch Intern Med, January 22, 2001; 161(2): 183 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
L. Pilote, F. Lavoie, V. Ho, and M. J. Eisenberg
Changes in the treatment and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in Quebec, 1988-1995
Can. Med. Assoc. J., July 1, 2000; 163(1): 31 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tu, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Austin, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tu, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Austin, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Vascular surgery
Right arrow Ischemic heart disease
Right arrow Other epidemiology
Right arrow Cardiothoracic surgery