CMAJ • June 3, 2008; 178 (12). doi:10.1503/cmaj.070690.
© 2008 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Résumé
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, G.
Right arrow Articles by MacGibbon, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, G., PhD
Right arrow Articles by MacGibbon, B., PhD
Related Collections
Right arrow Quality improvement
Right arrow Patient safety, clinical risk, medical error
Right arrowRelated Articles

Impact of patient communication problems on the risk of preventable adverse events in acute care settings

Gillian Bartlett, PhD, Régis Blais, PhD, Robyn Tamblyn, PhD, Richard J. Clermont, MD and Brenda MacGibbon, PhD

From the Department of Family Medicine (Bartlett), McGill University; the Department of Health Administration (Blais), Université de Montréal; the Departments of Medicine, and of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Tamblyn), McGill University; the Département de médecine (Clermont), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu; and the Département de mathématiques (MacGibbon), Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Que.


Figure 118
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1: Relation between index admission and occurrence (O) and detection (D) of adverse events over time. *Information was available to determine the period of capture for 52 of 63 preventable adverse events and {dagger}93 of 154 nonpreventable adverse events.

 

Figure 118
View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Box 1.

 

Figure 218
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2: Selection of medical charts screened for the occurrence of a preventable adverse event.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2.

 

Figure 318
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3: Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for factors associated with preventable adverse events, adjusted for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, admission status and type of hospital.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3.