CMAJ • May 8, 2007; 176 (10). doi:10.1503/cmaj.061011.
© 2007 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Appendices
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dendukuri, N.
Right arrow Articles by Brophy, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dendukuri, N.
Right arrow Articles by Brophy, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Breast Cancer
Right arrowRelated Articles

Testing for HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis

Nandini Dendukuri, Karim Khetani, Michelle McIsaac and James Brophy

From the Technology Assessment Unit (Dendukuri, McIsaac, Brophy) and the Department of Pathology (Khetani), McGill University Health Centre; and the Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dendukuri) and Medicine (Brophy), McGill University, Montréal, Que.


Figure 118
View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Box.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1.

 

Figure 118
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1: Results of literature search to identify studies that compared the use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to determine HER2 status. Note: some studies were excluded for multiple reasons.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 3.