CMAJ • February 17, 2009; 180 (4). doi:10.1503/cmaj.081041.
© 2009 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Résumé
Right arrow Online Appendices
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singh, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Singh, S. R., BScPhm MSc
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, H., BPharm PhD
Related Collections
Right arrow Drugs: endocrine system
Right arrow Diabetes
Right arrowRelated Articles


Research

Efficacy and safety of insulin analogues for the management of diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis

Sumeet R. Singh, BScPhm MSc, Fida Ahmad, MSc, Avtar Lal, MD PhD, Changhua Yu, MD MSc, Zemin Bai, MD MSc and Heather Bennett, BPharm PhD

From the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Ottawa, Ont.

Correspondence to: Mr. Sumeet Singh, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, 600–865 Carling Ave., Ottawa ON K1S 5S8; fax 613 226-5392; sumeets{at}cadth.ca

Background: Although insulin analogues are commonly prescribed for the management of diabetes mellitus, there is uncertainty regarding their optimal use. We conducted meta-analyses to compare the outcomes of insulin analogues with conventional insulins in the treatment of type 1, type 2 and gestational diabetes.

Methods: We updated 2 earlier systematic reviews of the efficacy and safety of rapid-and long-acting insulin analogues. We searched electronic databases, conference proceedings and "grey literature" up to April 2007 to identify randomized controlled trials that compared insulin analogues with conventional insulins. Study populations of interest were people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes (adult and pediatric) and women with gestational diabetes.

Results: We included 68 randomized controlled trials in the analysis of rapid-acting insulin analogues and 49 in the analysis of long-acting insulin analogues. Most of the studies were of short to medium duration and of low quality. In terms of hemoglobin A1c, we found minimal differences between rapid-acting insulin analogues and regular human insulin in adults with type 1 diabetes (weighted mean difference for insulin lispro: –0.09%, 95% confidence interval [CI] –0.16% to –0.02%; for insulin aspart: –0.13%, 95% CI –0.20% to –0.07%). We observed similar outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes (weighted mean difference for insulin lispro: –0.03%, 95% CI –0.12% to –0.06%; for insulin aspart: –0.09%, 95% CI –0.21% to 0.04%). Differences between long-acting insulin analogues and neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in terms of hemoglobin A1c were marginal among adults with type 1 diabetes (weighted mean difference for insulin glargine: –0.11%, 95% CI –0.21% to –0.02%; for insulin detemir: –0.06%, 95% CI –0.13% to 0.02%) and among adults with type 2 diabetes (weighted mean difference for insulin glargine: –0.05%, 95% CI –0.13% to 0.04%; for insulin detemir: 0.13%, 95% CI 0.03% to 0.22%). Benefits in terms of reduced hypoglycemia were inconsistent. There were insufficient data to determine whether insulin analogues are better than conventional insulins in reducing long-term diabetes-related complications or death.

Interpretation: Rapid-and long-acting insulin analogues offer little benefit relative to conventional insulins in terms of glycemic control or reduced hypoglycemia. Long-term, high-quality studies are needed to determine whether insulin analogues reduce the risk of long-term complications of diabetes.



Related Articles

Highlights
Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2009 180: 361. [Full Text] [PDF]

Dans ce numéro
Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2009 180: 362. [Full Text] [PDF]

Insulin analogues: too much noise about small benefits
Andrea Siebenhofer-Kroitzsch, MD, Karl Horvath, MD, and Johannes Plank, MD
Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2009 180: 369-370. [Full Text] [PDF]

Cost-effectiveness of insulin analogues for diabetes mellitus
Chris G. Cameron, MSc and Heather A. Bennett, BPharm PhD
Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2009 180: 400-407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
cfpHome page
T. Laubscher, L. Regier, and B. Jensen
Taking the stress out of insulin initiation in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Can Fam Physician, June 1, 2009; 55(6): 608 - 611.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
A. Siebenhofer-Kroitzsch MD, K. Horvath MD, and J. Plank MD
Insulin analogues: too much noise about small benefits
Can. Med. Assoc. J., February 17, 2009; 180(4): 369 - 370.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
C. G. Cameron MSc and H. A. Bennett BPharm PhD
Cost-effectiveness of insulin analogues for diabetes mellitus
Can. Med. Assoc. J., February 17, 2009; 180(4): 400 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Questionable methodology of Singh, et al.
David B Miller
CMAJ, 25 Feb 2009 [Full text]
Insulin Analogues can be transformational for patients
Ellen H Ullman
CMAJ, 25 Feb 2009 [Full text]
Analogue insulins may have other problems to
Dr Matthew R Kiln
CMAJ, 10 Mar 2009 [Full text]
Author response
Sumeet Singh
CMAJ, 15 Apr 2009 [Full text]
There is a draft at the back door
Matthew J Schurter
CMAJ, 9 Jun 2009 [Full text]