| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
From the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Diseases (Brotherton, McIntyre, Burgess), The Children's Hospital at Westmead, and the University of Sydney, New South Wales; the Department of Paediatrics (Gold), Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia; Department of Allergy and Immunology (Kemp), The Children's Hospital at Westmead; Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health (Kemp, Burgess), University of Sydney, New South Wales; and the New South Wales Department of Health (Campbell-Lloyd), North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Correspondence to: Dr. Julia Brotherton, National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Diseases, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Locked Bag 4001, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia; fax 61 2 9845 1418; juliab2{at}chw.edu.au
Background: In 2007, Australia implemented the National human papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination Program, which provides quadrivalent HPV vaccine free to all women aged 12–26 years. Following notification of 7 presumptive cases of anaphylaxis in the state of New South Wales, Australia, we verified cases and compared the incidence of anaphylaxis following HPV vaccination to other vaccines in comparable settings.
Methods: We contacted all patients with suspected anaphylaxis and obtained detailed histories from telephone interviews and a review of medical records. A multidisciplinary team determined whether each suspected case met the standardized Brighton definition. Some participants also received skin-prick allergy testing for common antigens and components of the HPV vaccine.
Results: Of 12 suspected cases, 8 were classified as anaphylaxis. Of these, 4 participants had negative skin-prick test results for intradermal Gardasil. From the 269 680 HPV vaccine doses administered in schools, 7 cases of anaphylaxis were identified, which represents an incidence rate of 2.6 per 100 000 doses (95% CI 1.0–5.3 per 100 000). In comparison, the rate of identified anaphylaxis was 0.1 per 100 000 doses (95% CI 0.003–0.7) for conjugated meningococcal C vaccination in a 2003 school-based program.
Interpretation: Based on the number of confirmed cases, the estimated rate of anaphylaxis following quadrivalent HPV vaccine was significantly higher than identified in comparable school-based delivery of other vaccines. However, overall rates were very low and managed appropriately with no serious sequelae.
Related Articles
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. B McIntyre, J. M L Brotherton, M. A Burgess, and A. S Kemp More data from Australia on sensitivity to HPV vaccine BMJ, January 9, 2009; 338(jan09_1): b26 - b26. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Schumacher MD Accuracy in images Can. Med. Assoc. J., December 2, 2008; 179(12): 1301 - 1301. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Halsey MD The human papillomavirus vaccine and risk of anaphylaxis Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 9, 2008; 179(6): 509 - 510. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. MacDonald MD MSc, M. B. Stanbrook MD PhD, and P. C. Hebert MD MHSc Human papillomavirus vaccine risk and reality Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 9, 2008; 179(6): 503 - 503. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. MacDonald MD MSc, M. B. Stanbrook MD PhD, and P. C. Hebert MD MHSc Le vaccin contre le virus du papillome humain : risques et realites Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 9, 2008; 179(6): 505 - 505. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters