|
From the Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Valiyeva, Rochon, Anderson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Valiyeva, Rochon, Gill, Anderson), Toronto, Ont.; the Division of Geriatric Psychiatry (Herrmann), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont.; the Departments of Psychiatry (Herrmann) and Medicine (Rochon), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; the Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit, Baycrest (Rochon), Toronto, Ont.; and Providence Healthcare, Queen's University (Gill), Kingston, Ont
Correspondence to: Dr. Elmira Valiyeva, Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 425–155 College St., Toronto ON M5T 3M6; fax 416 978-7350; elmira.valiyeva{at}utoronto.ca
Background: Three warnings of serious adverse events associated with the use of atypical antipsychotic drugs among elderly patients with dementia were sent to health care professionals in Canada. We assessed the impact of these warnings on prescription rates of antipsychotic drugs in this patient population.
Methods: We used prescription drug claims data from Ontario to calculate prescription rates of atypical and conventional antipsychotic drugs among elderly patients with dementia from May 1, 2000, to Feb. 28, 2007. We performed a time-series analysis to estimate the effect of each warning on rates of antipsychotic drug use.
Results: Before the first warning, growth in the use of atypical antipsychotics was responsible for an increasing rate of overall antipsychotic use. Each warning was associated with a small relative decrease in the predicted growth in the use of atypical antipsychotic drugs: a 5.0% decrease after the first warning, 4.9% after the second and 3.2% after the third (each p < 0.05). The overall prescription rate of antipsychotic drugs among patients with dementia increased by 20%, from 1512 per 100 000 elderly patients in September 2002, the month before the first warning, to 1813 per 100 000 in February 2007, 20 months after the last warning.
Interpretation: Although the warnings slowed the growth in the use of atypical antipsychotic drugs among patients with dementia, they did not reduce the overall prescription rate of these potentially dangerous drugs. More effective interventions are necessary to improve postmarket drug safety in vulnerable populations.
Related Articles
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. L. Lipscombe, L. Levesque, A. Gruneir, H. D. Fischer, D. N. Juurlink, S. S. Gill, N. Herrmann, J. E. Hux, G. M. Anderson, and P. A. Rochon Antipsychotic Drugs and Hyperglycemia in Older Patients With Diabetes Arch Intern Med, July 27, 2009; 169(14): 1282 - 1289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Y. Katz MD Concerns about health care warnings and their impact on prescribing behaviour Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 26, 2008; 179(5): 405 - 406. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||