CMAJ • February 26, 2008; 178 (5). doi:10.1503/cmaj.070981.
© 2008 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Résumé
Right arrow Online Appendices
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Majumdar, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rowe, B. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Majumdar, S. R., MD MPH
Right arrow Articles by Rowe, B. H., MD MSc
Related Collections
Right arrow Quality improvement
Right arrow Osteoporosis
Right arrowRelated Articles


Research

Multifaceted intervention to improve diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with recent wrist fracture: a randomized controlled trial

Sumit R. Majumdar, MD MPH, Jeffrey A. Johnson, PhD, Finlay A. McAlister, MD MSc, Debbie Bellerose, BScN, Anthony S. Russell, MD, David A. Hanley, MD, Don W. Morrish, MD PhD, Walter P. Maksymowych, MD and Brian H. Rowe, MD MSc

From the Departments of Medicine (Majumdar, McAlister, Bellerose, Russell, Morrish, Maksymowych) and Emergency Medicine (Bellerose, Rowe) and the School of Public Health (Johnson), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; and the Department of Medicine (Hanley), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.

Correspondence to: Dr. Sumit R. Majumdar, Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, 2E3.07 Walter Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440–112th St., Edmonton AB T6G 2B7; fax 780 407-2680; me2.majumdar{at}ualberta.ca

Background: Older patients who experience a fragility fracture are at high risk of future fractures but are rarely tested or treated for osteoporosis. We developed a multifaceted intervention directed at older patients with wrist fractures (in the form of telephone-based education) and their physicians (in the form of guidelines endorsed by opinion leaders, supported by reminders) to improve the quality of osteoporosis care.

Methods: In a randomized controlled trial with blinded ascertainment of outcomes, we compared our intervention with usual care (provision of printed educational materials to patients). Eligible patients were those older than 50 years of age who had experienced a wrist fracture and were seen in emergency departments and fracture clinics; we excluded those who were already being treated for osteoporosis. The primary outcome was bisphosphonate treatment within 6 months after the fracture. Secondary outcomes included bone mineral density testing, "appropriate care" (consisting of bone mineral density testing with treatment if bone mass was low) and quality of life.

Results: We screened 795 patients for eligibility and randomly assigned 272 to the intervention (137 patients) or control (135 patients) group. The median age was 60 years; 210 (77%) of the subjects were women, and 130 (48%) reported a previous fracture as an adult. Six months after the fracture, 30 (22%) of the intervention patients, as compared with 10 (7%) of the control patients, were receiving bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis (adjusted relative risk [RR] 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3–5.1, p = 0.008). Intervention patients were more likely than control patients to undergo bone mineral density testing (71/137 [52%] v. 24/135 [18%]; adjusted RR 2.8, 95% CI 1.9–4.2, p < 0.001) and to receive appropriate care (52/137 [38%] v. 15/135 [11%]; adjusted RR 3.1, 95% CI 1.8–5.3, p < 0.001). There were no differences between the groups in other outcomes. One patient died, and 4 others experienced recurrent fracture.

Interpretation: A multifaceted intervention directed at high-risk patients and their physicians substantially increased rates of testing and treatment for osteoporosis. Nevertheless, more than half of the patients in the intervention group were not receiving appropriate care 6 months after their fracture, which suggests that additional strategies should be explored. (ClinicalTrials.gov trial register no. NCT00152321.)



Related Articles

Highlights of this issue
Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2008 178: 525. [Full Text] [PDF]

Dans ce numéro
Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2008 178: 525. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. A. Ezekowitz
A new pathway? Failure, fragility and fractures
Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2010; 31(1): 9 - 11.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
F. A. McAlister, M. Fradette, S. R. Majumdar, R. Williams, M. Graham, J. McMeekin, W. A. Ghali, R. T. Tsuyuki, M. L. Knudtson, and J. Grimshaw
The Enhancing Secondary Prevention in Coronary Artery Disease trial
Can. Med. Assoc. J., December 8, 2009; 181(12): 897 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. J. Dunbar, A. Howard, E. R. Bogoch, J. Parvizi, and H. J. Kreder
Orthopaedics in 2020: Predictors of Musculoskeletal Need
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2009; 91(9): 2276 - 2286.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. van Diepen, S. R. Majumdar, J. A. Bakal, F. A. McAlister, and J. A. Ezekowitz
Heart Failure Is a Risk Factor for Orthopedic Fracture: A Population-Based Analysis of 16 294 Patients
Circulation, November 4, 2008; 118(19): 1946 - 1952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]