CMAJ • January 1, 2008; 178 (1). doi:10.1503/cmaj.061743.
© 2008 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Résumé
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parshuram, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Laupacis, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parshuram, C. S., MB ChB DPh
Right arrow Articles by Laupacis, A., MD MSc
Related Collections
Right arrow Patient safety, clinical risk, medical error
Right arrowRelated Articles


Research

Systematic evaluation of errors occurring during the preparation of intravenous medication

Christopher S. Parshuram, MB ChB DPhil, Teresa To, PhD, Winnie Seto, BScPhm PharmD, Angela Trope, MSc RPh, Gideon Koren, MBBS and Andreas Laupacis, MD MSc

From the Department of Critical Care Medicine (Parshuram), the Department of Pharmacy (Seto, Trope), the Center for Safety Research, Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program (Parshuram, To, Seto, Trope, Koren), the Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children; the Departments of Paediatrics (Koren), and Health Policy Management and Evaluation (To, Laupacis), University of Toronto; and the Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences (Laupacis), Toronto, Ont.

Correspondence to: Dr. Christopher S. Parshuram, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave., Toronto ON M5G 1X8; fax 416 813-7299; christopher.parshuram{at}sickkids.ca

Introduction: Errors in the concentration of intravenous medications are not uncommon. We evaluated steps in the infusion-preparation process to identify factors associated with preventable medication errors.

Methods: We included 118 health care professionals who would be involved in the preparation of intravenous medication infusions as part of their regular clinical activities. Participants performed 5 infusion-preparation tasks (drug-volume calculation, rounding, volume measurement, dose-volume calculation, mixing) and prepared 4 morphine infusions to specified concentrations. The primary outcome was the occurrence of error (deviation of > 5% for volume measurement and > 10% for other measures). The secondary outcome was the magnitude of error.

Results: Participants performed 1180 drug-volume calculations, 1180 rounding calculations and made 1767 syringe-volume measurements, and they prepared 464 morphine infusions. We detected errors in 58 (4.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7% to 6.2%) drug-volume calculations, 30 (2.5%, 95% CI 1.6% to 3.4%) rounding calculations and 29 (1.6%, 95% CI 1.1% to 2.2%) volume measurements. We found 7 errors (1.6%, 95% CI 0.4% to 2.7%) in drug mixing. Of the 464 infusion preparations, 161 (34.7%, 95% CI 30.4% to 39%) contained concentration errors. Calculator use was associated with fewer errors in dose-volume calculations (4% v. 10%, p = 0.001). Four factors were positively associated with the occurence of a concentration error: fewer infusions prepared in the previous week (p = 0.007), increased number of years of professional experience (p = 0.01), the use of the more concentrated stock solution (p < 0.001) and the preparation of smaller dose volumes (p < 0.001). Larger magnitude errors were associated with fewer hours of sleep in the previous 24 hours (p = 0.02), the use of more concentrated solutions (p < 0.001) and preparation of smaller infusion doses (p < 0.001).

Interpretation: Our data suggest that the reduction of provider fatigue and production of pediatric-strength solutions or industry-prepared infusions may reduce medication errors.



Related Articles

Highlights of this issue
Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2008 178: 5. [Full Text] [PDF]

Dans ce numéro
Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2008 178: 5. [Full Text] [PDF]

Medication errors: the human factor
Edward Etchells, MD MSc, David Juurlink, MD PhD, and Wendy Levinson, MD
Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2008 178: 63-64. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
B. C. O'Neal, J. C. Worden, and R. J. Couldry
Telepharmacy and bar-code technology in an i.v. chemotherapy admixture area
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., July 1, 2009; 66(13): 1211 - 1217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
E. Camire, E. Moyen, and H. T. Stelfox
Medication errors in critical care: risk factors, prevention and disclosure
Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 28, 2009; 180(9): 936 - 943.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
R. Shane
Current status of administration of medicines
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., March 1, 2009; 66(5_Supplement_3): s42 - s48.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
Proceedings of a summit on preventing patient harm and death from i.v. medication errors
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., December 15, 2008; 65(24): 2367 - 2379.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crit Care NurseHome page
G. Alspach
Napping on the Night Shift: Slacker or Savior?
Crit. Care Nurse, December 1, 2008; 28(6): 12 - 19.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
E. Etchells MD MSc, D. Juurlink MD PhD, and W. Levinson MD
Medication errors: the human factor
Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 1, 2008; 178(1): 63 - 64.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Clinical evidence in favour of the implementation of a pediatric vial to improve dose accuracy
Karel Allegaert
CMAJ, 24 Jan 2008 [Full text]