Advertisement
ADVANCED SEARCH

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Résumé Online Appendix Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Aujesky, D. Articles by Ibrahim, S. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Aujesky, D., MD MSc Articles by Ibrahim, S. A., MD MPH Related Collections Other respiratory medicine Related Articles

Hospital volume and patient outcomes in pulmonary embolism

From the Division of Internal Medicine (Aujesky), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; the VA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (Mor, Geng, Fine, Ibrahim), Pittsburgh, Pa.; the Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health (Mor, Geng) and the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine (Fine, Ibrahim), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa.; and the Department of Emergency Medicine (Renaud), University Hospital Henri Mondor, Paris, France

Correspondence to: Dr. Drahomir Aujesky, Service de Médecine Interne, BH 10-622, Centre Hospitalier, Universitaire Vaudois, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; fax +41 21 314 0871; drahomir.aujesky{at}chuv.ch

Background: In numerous high-risk medical and surgical conditions, a greater volume of patients undergoing treatment in a given setting or facility is associated with better survival. For patients with pulmonary embolism, the relation between the number of patients treated in a hospital (volume) and patient outcome is unknown.

Methods: We studied discharge records from 186 acute care hospitals in Pennsylvania for a total of 15 531 patients for whom the primary diagnosis was pulmonary embolism. The study outcomes were all-cause mortality in hospital and within 30 days after presentation for pulmonary embolism and the length of hospital stay. We used logistic models to study the association between hospital volume and 30-day mortality and discrete survival models to study the association between in-hospital mortality and time to hospital discharge.

Results: The median annual hospital volume for pulmonary embolism was 20 patients (interquartile range 10–42). Overall in-hospital mortality was 6.0%, whereas 30-day mortality was 9.3%. In multivariable analysis, very-high-volume hospitals ( 42 cases per year) had a significantly lower odds of in-hospital death (odds ratio [OR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51–0.99) and of 30-day death (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54–0.92) than very-low-volume hospitals (< 10 cases per year). Although patients in the very-high-volume hospitals had a slightly longer length of stay than those in the very-low-volume hospitals (mean difference 0.7 days), there was no association between volume and length of stay.

Interpretation: In hospitals with a high volume of cases, pulmonary embolism was associated with lower short-term mortality. Further research is required to determine the causes of the relation between volume and outcome for patients with pulmonary embolism.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. D. Howell A 37-Year-Old Man Trying to Choose a High-Quality Hospital: Review of Hospital Quality Indicators JAMA, December 2, 2009; 302(21): 2353 - 2360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

HOME	CURRENT ISSUE	PAST ISSUES	COLLECTIONS	HELP	SEARCH
Copyright 1995-2008, Canadian Medical Association. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p) All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.