|
From the University of Ottawa Heart Institute (Birnie, Williams, Lemery, Green, Gollob, Tang); the Health Statistics Division (Sambell, Johansen), Statistics Canada, Ottawa; and the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Lee), Toronto, Ont.
Correspondence to: Dr. David Birnie, Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Rd., Ottawa ON K1Y 4W7; fax 613 761-4407; dbirnie{at}ottawaheart.ca
Background: Cardiac arrest due to ventricular arrhythmia in the absence of a reversible cause or contraindication has been a class I indication for insertion of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator since 1998. We compared and contrasted the use of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in Canada and the United States among adults who survived a cardiac arrest.
Method: Data on hospital separations from April 1, 1994 through March 31, 2003 were obtained from the Health Person-Oriented Information Database maintained by Statistics Canada and from the US National Hospital Discharge Survey on all patients with a primary diagnosis of cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation or ventricular flutter for the same 9-year period. We excluded all records of patients with a secondary diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.
Results: In Canada, 3793 patients survived to discharge after a cardiac arrest; 628 (16.6%) of these were implanted with a cardioverter defibrillator before discharge. The implant rate rose steadily from 5.4% in 1994/95 to 26.7% in 2002/03. In the United States, 23 688 (30.2%) of 78 538 such survivors received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator before discharge. Logistic regression analysis indicated that sex, age, fiscal year, the hospital's teaching status, hospital size and patient history of heart failure were positive predictors of implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation. Age, renal failure, liver failure and cancer were negative predictors of receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
Interpretation: The rate of use of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy for cardiac arrest survivors in Canada is increasing, but still is lower than the rate in the United States.
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. A. Scott, N. G. Turner, A. Chungh, J. M. Morgan, and P. R. Roberts Varying implantable cardioverter defibrillator referral patterns from implanting and non-implanting hospitals Europace, August 1, 2009; 11(8): 1048 - 1051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Schulz, K. Puschel, and E. E. Turk Fatal complications of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: medical malpractice? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2009; 8(4): 444 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Bierman MD MS Sex matters: gender disparities in quality and outcomes of care Can. Med. Assoc. J., December 4, 2007; 177(12): 1520 - 1521. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Simpson MD Implantable cardioverter defibrillators work so why aren't we using them? Can. Med. Assoc. J., July 3, 2007; 177(1): 49 - 51. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||