CMAJ • January 2, 2007; 176 (1). doi:10.1503/cmaj.060687.
© 2007 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Appendix
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ilakovac, V.
Right arrow Articles by Marusic, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ilakovac, V.
Right arrow Articles by Marusic, A.

Research

Reliability of disclosure forms of authors' contributions

Vesna Ilakovac, Kristina Fister, Matko Marusic and Ana Marusic

From the Department of Medical Statistics and Medical Informatics (Ilakovac), School of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University, Osijek; and the Andrija Stampar School of Public Health (Fister) and Croatian Medical Journal (M. Marusic, A. Marusic), Zagreb University School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.

Correspondence to: Dr. Ana Marusic, Zagreb University School of Medicine, Salata 3, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia; fax 011 385 1 459 0222; marusica{at}mef.hr

Background: The contribution disclosure forms used by medical journals to assess and confirm authorship are surveys of self-reported behaviour that follow the cognitive rules of psychometric instruments. We sought to analyze how autobiographical memory, defined as memory for events and issues related to oneself, affected the reliability of contribution forms for the judging of authorship of research articles.

Methods: We conducted a prospective study, which ultimately included 919 authors of 201 articles submitted to a general medical journal from July 2001 through December 2002. A authorship disclosure form with a checklist of 11 possible contribution choices for all authors was sent first to each article's corresponding author, who was asked to fill it out for all authors. A blank form was then sent to each author individually to disclose his or her own contribution to that article. The main outcome measure was test– retest differences between the corresponding authors' self-declarations, expressed in percent as the gross difference rate (GDR) for each article.

Results: More than two-thirds of the corresponding authors (69.7%) differed in at least 1 contribution choice between the 2 disclosure statements made about their own contributions. The reliability of their answers was low to moderate (GDRs > 10%), especially for contributions on the provision of study materials or patients or final approval of the article (GDR 22.9%), guarantor of the study (GDR 20.9%) and drafting of the manuscript (GDR 20.4%). As a proxy for their coauthors' contributions, corresponding authors also differed from them in the perception of noncorresponding authors' contributions, disagreeing in 69.4% of cases. Of the 718 noncorresponding authors, 204 (28.4%) met all the criteria for authorship set out by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors according to the statement given by the corresponding author. When they described their own contributions, this prevalence increased to 40.5%.

Interpretation: Psychological factors such as autobiographical memory may confound contribution disclosures as an evaluation tool for authorship on scientific articles and affect responsible authorship and publication practices.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
H. Marcovitch
How do potential conflicts of interest confuse medicine and public health?: How could disclosure of interests work better in medicine, epidemiology and public health?
J Epidemiol Community Health, August 1, 2009; 63(8): 608 - 609.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CMAJHome page
B. Sibbald BJ and K. Flegel MDCM MSc
L'integrite au Croatian Medical Journal
Can. Med. Assoc. J., June 17, 2008; 178(13): 1639 - 1640.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CMAJHome page
B. Sibbald BJ and K. Flegel MDCM MSc
Integrity at the Croatian Medical Journal
Can. Med. Assoc. J., June 17, 2008; 178(13): 1637 - 1638.
[Full Text] [PDF]