CMAJ • October 10, 2006; 175 (8). doi:10.1503/cmaj.060895.
© 2006 CMA Media Inc. or its licensors
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shemie, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dossetor, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shemie, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dossetor, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Organ donation


National recommendations for donation after cardiocirculatory death in Canada

Donation after cardiocirculatory death in Canada

Sam D. Shemie, Andrew J. Baker, Greg Knoll, William Wall, Graeme Rocker, Daniel Howes, Janet Davidson, Joe Pagliarello, Jane Chambers-Evans, Sandra Cockfield, Catherine Farrell, Walter Glannon, William Gourlay, David Grant, Stéphan Langevin, Brian Wheelock, Kimberly Young and John Dossetor*

*See Appendix 1 for affiliations and a complete list of committees and contributors to this work.

Correspondence to: Dr. Sam D. Shemie, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal QC H3H 1P3; sam.shemie{at}muhc.mcgill.ca

These recommendations are the result of a national, multidisciplinary, year-long process to discuss whether and how to proceed with organ donation after cardiocirculatory death (DCD) in Canada. A national forum was held in February 2005 to discuss and develop recommendations on the principles, procedures and practice related to DCD, including ethical and legal considerations. At the forum's conclusion, a strong majority of participants supported proceeding with DCD programs in Canada. The forum also recognized the need to formulate and emphasize core values to guide the development of programs and protocols based on the medical, ethical and legal framework established at this meeting.

Although end-of-life care should routinely include the opportunity to donate organs and tissues, the duty of care toward dying patients and their families remains the dominant priority of health care teams. The complexity and profound implications of death are recognized and should be respected, along with differing personal, ethnocultural and religious perspectives on death and donation. Decisions around withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies, management of the dying process and the determination of death by cardiocirculatory criteria should be separate from and independent of donation and transplant processes.

The recommendations in this report are intended to guide individual programs, regional health authorities and jurisdictions in the development of DCD protocols. Programs will develop based on local leadership and advance planning that includes education and engagement of stakeholders, mechanisms to assure safety and quality and public information. We recommend that programs begin with controlled DCD within the intensive care unit where (after a consensual decision to withdraw life-sustaining therapy) death is anticipated, but has not yet occurred, and unhurried consent discussions can be held. Uncontrolled donation (where death has occurred after unanticipated cardiac arrest) should only be considered after a controlled DCD program is well established. Although we recommend that programs commence with kidney donation, regional transplant expertise may guide the inclusion of other organs. The impact of DCD, including pre-and post-mortem interventions, on donor family experiences, organ availability, graft function and recipient survival should be carefully documented and studied.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. R. Joffe, N. R. Anton, and A. R. deCaen
Survey of Pediatricians' Opinions on Donation After Cardiac Death: Are the Donors Dead?
Pediatrics, November 1, 2008; 122(5): e967 - e974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. D. Halpern, A. Shaked, R. D. Hasz, and A. L. Caplan
Informing Candidates for Solid-Organ Transplantation about Donor Risk Factors
N. Engl. J. Med., June 26, 2008; 358(26): 2832 - 2837.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. D. D. Bell
Non-heart beating organ donation: in urgent need of intensive care
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2008; 100(6): 738 - 741.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
R. Mazor and H. P. Baden
Trends in Pediatric Organ Donation After Cardiac Death
Pediatrics, October 1, 2007; 120(4): e960 - e966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Organ Donation after Cardiocirculatory Death and the Dead Donor Rule: what is the evidence?
Mohamed Y Rady
CMAJ, 30 Oct 2006 [Full text]