CMAJ • January 17, 2006; 174 (2). doi:10.1503/cmaj.050748.
© 2006 CMA Media Inc. or its licensors
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correction (v174,p1874)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Drugs: cardiovascular system
Right arrow Diabetes
Right arrowRelated Article


Research

Dose–response relation between sulfonylurea drugs and mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a population-based cohort study

Scot H. Simpson, Sumit R. Majumdar, Ross T. Tsuyuki, Dean T. Eurich and Jeffrey A. Johnson

From the Institute of Health Economics (all authors); the Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (Simpson, Tsuyuki); the Divisions of General Internal Medicine (Majumdar) and Cardiology (Tsuyuki), Department of Medicine; and the Department of Public Health Sciences (Majumdar, Tsuyuki, Eurich, Johnson), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.

Correspondence to: Dr. Jeffrey A. Johnson, 10405 Jasper Ave., Rm. 1200, Edmonton AB T5J 3N4; fax 780 448-0018; jeff.johnson{at}ualberta.ca

Background: Over the past 30 years, the relation between use of sulfonylureas to treat type 2 diabetes and the risk of cardiovascular events has been vigorously debated. The purpose of this study was to determine if the risk of death changes with level of exposure to sulfonylurea drugs.

Methods: This was a retrospective, inception cohort study using administrative data from Saskatchewan Health (1991– 1999). The 5795 subjects, identified by their first-ever dispensation for an oral antidiabetic agent, were grouped according to their use of such agents during follow-up. Potential subjects using insulin or combination therapy were excluded. Exposure level was defined by daily dose and degree of adherence. Separate multivariate Cox proportional-hazard models were constructed for each monotherapy group and used to calculate the risk of death associated with higher versus lower exposure category. Disease severity indicators were identified among the administrative data and entered as covariates in each model. The main outcomes were all-cause mortality and death from an acute ischemic event.

Results: The mean age of the cohort members was 66.3 (standard deviation [SD] 13.4) years; 43.4% were female; and their mean duration of follow-up was 4.6 (SD 2.1) years. First-generation sulfonylureas were used exclusively by 120 subjects; glyburide, by 4138; and metformin, by 1537. A greater risk of death was associated with higher daily doses of the first-generation sulfonylureas (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0–4.7) and glyburide (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2–1.4), but not metformin (HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7–1.1). Similar associations were observed for death caused by an acute ischemic event.

Interpretation: Higher exposure to sulfonylureas was associated with increased mortality among patients newly treated for type 2 diabetes. The same relation was not observed with metformin. This implies that the manner in which blood glucose concentration is lowered may be as important as achieving recommended glucose targets.



Related Article

Do sulfonylurea drugs increase the risk of cardiac events?
David S.H. Bell
Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2006 174: 185-186. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
I. Tzoulaki, M. Molokhia, V. Curcin, M. P Little, C. J Millett, A. Ng, R. I Hughes, K. Khunti, M. R Wilkins, A. Majeed, et al.
Risk of cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes prescribed oral antidiabetes drugs: retrospective cohort study using UK general practice research database
BMJ, December 3, 2009; 339(dec03_1): b4731 - b4731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
S. A. Kassem and I. Raz
Is There Evidence That Oral Hypoglycemic Agents Reduce Cardiovascular Morbidity or Mortality? No
Diabetes Care, November 1, 2009; 32(suppl_2): S337 - S341.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc Qual OutcomesHome page
D. A. Lamb, D. T. Eurich, F. A. McAlister, R. T. Tsuyuki, W. M. Semchuk, T. W. Wilson, and D. F. Blackburn
Changes in Adherence to Evidence-Based Medications in the First Year After Initial Hospitalization for Heart Failure: Observational Cohort Study From 1994 to 2003
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, May 1, 2009; 2(3): 228 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
J. Z. Duan
Two Commonly Used Methods for Exposure-Adverse Events Analysis: Comparisons and Evaluations
J. Clin. Pharmacol., May 1, 2009; 49(5): 540 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
J. W. M. Cheng, S. H. Bhatt, and J. D. Goldman-Levine
The Benefit and Risk of Antidiabetic Agents Used in Patients With Heart Disease
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, April 1, 2009; 22(2): 179 - 193.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
F. A. McAlister, D. T. Eurich, S. R. Majumdar, and J. A. Johnson
The risk of heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral agent monotherapy
Eur J Heart Fail, July 1, 2008; 10(7): 703 - 708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
E. Standl and O. Schnell
Insulin as a First-Line Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: Should the use of sulfonylureas be halted?
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2008; 31(Supplement_2): S136 - S139.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
L. G. Mellbin, K. Malmberg, A. Norhammar, H. Wedel, L. Ryden, and for the DIGAMI 2 Investigators
The impact of glucose lowering treatment on long-term prognosis in patients with type 2 diabetes and myocardial infarction: a report from the DIGAMI 2 trial
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2008; 29(2): 166 - 176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
D. T Eurich, F. A McAlister, D. F Blackburn, S. R Majumdar, R. T Tsuyuki, J. Varney, and J. A Johnson
Benefits and harms of antidiabetic agents in patients with diabetes and heart failure: systematic review
BMJ, September 8, 2007; 335(7618): 497 - 497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
M. C. Granberry, J. B. Hawkins, and A. M. Franks
Thiazolidinediones in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., May 1, 2007; 64(9): 931 - 936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. E. Kahn, S. M. Haffner, M. A. Heise, W. H. Herman, R. R. Holman, N. P. Jones, B. G. Kravitz, J. M. Lachin, M. C. O'Neill, B. Zinman, et al.
Glycemic Durability of Rosiglitazone, Metformin, or Glyburide Monotherapy
N. Engl. J. Med., December 7, 2006; 355(23): 2427 - 2443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes and Vascular Disease ResearchHome page
R. A Ajjan and P. J Grant
Cardiovascular disease prevention in patients with type 2 diabetes: the role of oral anti-diabetic agents
Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, December 1, 2006; 3(3): 147 - 158.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Med.Home page
R. Lehman
Evidently...
Evid. Based Med., August 1, 2006; 11(4): 102 - 102.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Med.Home page
Other articles noted
Evid. Based Med., August 1, 2006; 11(4): 127 - 128.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular DiseaseHome page
P. Valensi and G. Slama
Review: Sulphonylureas and cardiovascular risk: facts and controversies
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, July 1, 2006; 6(4): 159 - 165.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
S. Lofsky
Patient characteristics not described
Can. Med. Assoc. J., June 20, 2006; 174(13): 1874 - 1874.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Do Sulfonylureas Increase Mortality?
Journal Watch (General), February 3, 2006; 2006(203): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]


Home page
CMAJHome page
D. S.H. Bell
Do sulfonylurea drugs increase the risk of cardiac events?
Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 17, 2006; 174(2): 185 - 186.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Patient characteristics not described
Stanley Lofsky
CMAJ, 3 Apr 2006 [Full text]