CMAJ • July 5, 2005; 173 (1). doi:10.1503/cmaj.1041137.
© 2005 CMA Media Inc. or its licensors
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ducharme, A.
Right arrow Articles by Brophy, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ducharme, A.
Right arrow Articles by Brophy, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other cardiovascular medicine
Right arrowRelated Articles


Research
Recherche

Impact of care at a multidisciplinary congestive heart failure clinic: a randomized trial

Anique Ducharme, Odette Doyon, Michel White, Jean L. Rouleau and James M. Brophy

From the Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, University of Montreal (Ducharme, Doyon, White, Rouleau); the Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Que. (Brophy); and the Department of Health Sciences, University of Quebec at Trois-Rivieres, Trois-Rivieres, Que. (Doyon)

Correspondence to: Dr. James Brophy, Cardiology Service Room M4.76, McGill University Health Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, 687 Pine St. West, Montréal QC H3A 1A1; fax 514 843-1493; james.brophy{at}mcgill.ca

Background: Although multidisciplinary congestive heart failure clinics in the United States appear to be effective in reducing the number of hospital readmissions, it is unclear whether the same benefit is seen in countries such as Canada, where access to both general and specialized medical care is free and unrestricted. We sought to determine the impact of care at a multidisciplinary specialized outpatient congestive heart failure clinic compared with standard care.

Methods: We randomly assigned 230 eligible patients who had experienced an acute episode of congestive heart failure to standard care (n = 115) or follow-up at a multidisciplinary specialized heart failure outpatient clinic (n = 115). The intervention consisted of a structured outpatient clinic environment with complete access to cardiologists and allied health professionals. The primary outcomes were all-cause hospital admission rates and total number of days in hospital at 6 months. The secondary outcomes were total number of emergency department visits, quality of life and total mortality.

Results: At 6 months, fewer patients in the intervention group had required readmission to hospital than patients in the control group (45 [39%] v. 66 [57%], crude hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38–0.92. Patients in the intervention group stayed in hospital for 514 days compared with 815 days required by patients in the control group (adjusted HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35–0.89). The number of patients seen in the emergency department and the total number of emergency department visits were similar in the intervention and control groups. At 6 months, quality of life, which was self-assessed using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, was unchanged in the control group but improved in the intervention group (p < 0.001). No difference in mortality was observed, with 19 deaths in the control group and 12 in the intervention group (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.24–1.54).

Interpretation: Compared with usual care, care at a multidisciplinary specialized congestive heart failure outpatient clinic reduced the number of hospital readmissions and hospital days and improved quality of life. When our results are integrated with those from other, similar trials, multidisciplinary disease management strategies for congestive heart failure are associated with clinically worthwhile improvements in survival.



Related Articles

Multidisciplinary heart failure clinics: Are they effective in Canada?
Michael W. Rich
Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2005 173: 53-54. [Full Text] [PDF]

Highlights of this issue
Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2005 173: 9. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
N. Azad, F. Molnar, and A. Byszewski
Lessons learned from a multidisciplinary heart failure clinic for older women: a randomised controlled trial
Age Ageing, May 1, 2008; 37(3): 282 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. C. Bourge, W. T. Abraham, P. B. Adamson, M. F. Aaron, J. M. Aranda Jr, A. Magalski, M. R. Zile, A. L. Smith, F. W. Smart, M. A. O'Shaughnessy, et al.
Randomized controlled trial of an implantable continuous hemodynamic monitor in patients with advanced heart failure: the COMPASS-HF study.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 18, 2008; 51(11): 1073 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
B. R. Hemmelgarn, B. J. Manns, J. Zhang, M. Tonelli, S. Klarenbach, M. Walsh, B. F. Culleton, and for the Alberta Kidney Disease Network
Association between Multidisciplinary Care and Survival for Elderly Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2007; 18(3): 993 - 999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
M. W. Rich
Multidisciplinary heart failure clinics: Are they effective in Canada?
Can. Med. Assoc. J., July 5, 2005; 173(1): 53 - 54.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

CHF clinics improve outcome
Eduardo R. Azevedo
CMAJ, 12 Jul 2005 [Full text]
Pharmacist on CHF teams
Doson Chua
CMAJ, 29 Jul 2005 [Full text]
Beta-blockers and multidisciplinary congestive heart failure clinic
Luciano M Santos
CMAJ, 30 Nov 2005 [Full text]